Author Topic: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)  (Read 116059 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #50: February 06, 2016, 03:10:45 PM »
Look at the link that HS posted for payrolls.  If you click on the drop down for the year, the Nationals have $71M committed for 2018, the Yankees, $104M.   For 2019, they both have $55M committed.   And next year is a dumpster fire for free agents.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #51: February 06, 2016, 03:38:29 PM »
Look at the link that HS posted for payrolls.  If you click on the drop down for the year, the Nationals have $71M committed for 2018, the Yankees, $104M.   For 2019, they both have $55M committed.   And next year is a dumpster fire for free agents.
And the Yankees are willing to pay the luxury tax. The Nationals are not.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29564
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #52: February 06, 2016, 03:50:56 PM »
And the Yankees are willing to pay the luxury tax Harper. The Nationals are not.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #53: February 06, 2016, 03:53:58 PM »
And the Yankees are willing to pay the luxury tax.

The new Steinbrenners aren't.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #54: February 06, 2016, 04:06:22 PM »
The new Steinbrenners aren't.
They will once they get under it fora season and reset. Harper is going to the Yankees. Boras wants to get paid, Harper wants to win, and he wants a legacy. The Nationals cannot provide any of that.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18063
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #55: February 06, 2016, 04:50:28 PM »
The new Steinbrenners aren't.

They could have gotten pretty close to under it when Cano left after 2013 but instead signed McCann, Beltran, Ellsbury and Tanaka. They'll try to under the next CBA when the luxury tax expands to over $200 million.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #56: February 06, 2016, 04:53:14 PM »
The new Steinbrenners aren't.

I'll believe the lerners are more willing to spend than the steinbrenners once the nats payroll overtakes the Yankees - I wonder when that will be

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16423
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #57: February 06, 2016, 05:00:04 PM »
They could have gotten pretty close to under it when Cano left after 2013 but instead signed McCann, Beltran, Ellsbury and Tanaka. They'll try to under the next CBA when the luxury tax expands to over $200 million.

It's not just the luxury tax, whether the Yankees must pay it or not. Probably a bigger issue: the Yankees now have competition from the Mets. Have not had much competition since the early '90s, when both teams were mediocre. The Mets went to the World Series, the Mets have four good starters, the Mets have a few hitters. About two years ago, the only zip-code with a majority of Met fans was a spot in Flushing Meadow Park. That's changing.

It's not clear that the Yankees can wait while Texeira and ARod and other contracts drop away.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #58: February 06, 2016, 05:05:00 PM »
It's not just the luxury tax, whether the Yankees must pay it or not. Probably a bigger issue: the Yankees now have competition from the Mets. Have not had much competition since the early '90s, when both teams were mediocre. The Mets went to the World Series, the Mets have four good starters, the Mets have a few hitters. About two years ago, the only zip-code with a majority of Met fans was a spot in Flushing Meadow Park. That's changing.

It's not clear that the Yankees can wait while Texeira and ARod and other contracts drop away.

What defines "competition"?   What's the competiton for?      Isn't NYC big enough to take care of both of them?   Is it more bragging rights and gear?

As an outsider and a person who's in awe of the Apple market, I would think that there's plenty to go around.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #59: February 06, 2016, 06:36:51 PM »
What defines "competition"?   What's the competiton for?      Isn't NYC big enough to take care of both of them?   Is it more bragging rights and gear?

As an outsider and a person who's in awe of the Apple market, I would think that there's plenty to go around.

Everyone in my wife's family (nyc and northern nj) is one or the other and despises the other team - same with jets Giants

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29564
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #60: February 06, 2016, 06:39:25 PM »
Everyone in my wife's family (nyc and northern nj) is one or the other and despises the other team - same with jets Giants

Same is true in Chicago with the White Sox and Cubs...

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22292
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #61: February 06, 2016, 08:26:56 PM »
Absolutely.
Everyone in my wife's family (nyc and northern nj) is one or the other and despises the other team - same with jets Giants

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16423
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #62: February 06, 2016, 11:25:24 PM »
What defines "competition"?   What's the competiton for?      Isn't NYC big enough to take care of both of them?   Is it more bragging rights and gear?

As an outsider and a person who's in awe of the Apple market, I would think that there's plenty to go around.

If you can get about 90% of baseball fans in the NY area, you want all 90%...not just 50% or 60%. Yes, it's a big market, but the Yankees want every kid to demand a Yankees hat, tee-shirt, anything else they can sell. They want callers to pepper WFAN with calls about the Yankees. They liked it best when people forgot the Mets existed.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #63: February 07, 2016, 11:44:40 AM »
There isn't any competition between the Yankees and Mets in the business sense of the word - they are not competing for fans. If you are a fan of the Yankees you don't switch because the Yankees aren't doing well and the Mets are, or vice versa.   They may be competing for bragging rights. I'm sure the players don't care about that; they owners might, I suppose.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 16423
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #64: February 07, 2016, 12:28:40 PM »
There isn't any competition between the Yankees and Mets in the business sense of the word - they are not competing for fans. If you are a fan of the Yankees you don't switch because the Yankees aren't doing well and the Mets are, or vice versa.   They may be competing for bragging rights. I'm sure the players don't care about that; they owners might, I suppose.

It's a little bit of bragging rights, but many fans will shift if one team is consistently good ("27 Time World Champion" it says on the stadium) and the other is consistently mediocre or worse. I'm not sure how much a team makes from ticket sales, how much from merchandising. I think broadcast revenues are fixed when a team signs a contract with a network ( ignoring MASN and the Nats). It probably means something when NYC is flooded with "Yankee-ness" while only a few die-hard fans pay attention to the Mets. That began to turn last season.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #65: February 07, 2016, 01:54:48 PM »
This is a silly breakaway argument that misses the premise: Bryce's dad loves the Yankees, Bryce loves his dad. Automatic edge. Impossible to know how much it matters.

Offline Dave301

  • Posts: 603
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #66: February 07, 2016, 11:49:03 PM »
Cool pic.


Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #67: February 08, 2016, 12:20:32 AM »
Who's on the left?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #68: February 08, 2016, 12:57:12 AM »
Who's on the left?

I'm sure you're kidding but I don't know you're kidding.  More people would say who's that on the right than who's that on the left.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #69: February 08, 2016, 01:49:04 AM »
Harp > Steph

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63326
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #70: February 08, 2016, 07:02:45 AM »

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #71: February 08, 2016, 08:21:36 AM »
I'm sure you're kidding but I don't know you're kidding.  More people would say who's that on the right than who's that on the left.
There are some here who pay no attention at  all to basketball.  Like me.  I had to look up Seth Curry to see who he was.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25972
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #72: February 08, 2016, 08:22:31 AM »
There are some here who pay no attention at  all to basketball.  Like me.  I had to look up Seth Curry to see who he was.
Seth Curry is Steph Curry's brother.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #73: February 08, 2016, 08:35:50 AM »
Steph Curry
Oh! Duh. I just didn't recognize him. I only watch NBA via bars and highlight clips so this is the first time I've seen his face bigger than an inch on my screen.

Offline Truconfidence

  • Posts: 3468
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #74: February 08, 2016, 10:55:34 AM »
I'm sure you're kidding but I don't know you're kidding.  More people would say who's that on the right than who's that on the left.
Id say Stephs Q rating is way above Harps.