Author Topic: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)  (Read 116076 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63331
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #175: February 16, 2016, 04:26:57 PM »
People acting it like it is a done deal that he will sign with the Yankees are really being silly imo

Sure they Yankees will clear a lot of salary BUT they won't just sit there waiting for Bryce they will have to sign other people

The Nats are not a small market team - small market teams are not defined by their market size but by how much their owners have and are willing to spend Nats owners have a tonne of money and are willing to spend (plus the TV deal will get straightened out which will help)

Bryce signing with the Nats is just as likely as any scenario --- yes he's spoken of his love for Mantle/Yankees etc but he has also spoken of playing for 1 team his whole career so that's a wash too

The Nats owners are playing like a mid-market team. That's why Papelbon is on the team.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #176: February 16, 2016, 04:30:11 PM »
The Nats owners are playing like a mid-market team. That's why Papelbon is on the team.

if by mid market you mean 6th highest opening day payroll in the MLB last season, then yes, totally mid market

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29572
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #177: February 16, 2016, 05:26:34 PM »
if by mid market you mean 6th highest opening day payroll in the MLB last season, then yes, totally mid market

I think he meant having a roster that can't make the playoffs...

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63331
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #178: February 16, 2016, 05:31:17 PM »
if by mid market you mean 6th highest opening day payroll in the MLB last season, then yes, totally mid market
That's only because of terrible contracts. They have zero payroll flexibility.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21642
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #179: February 16, 2016, 05:32:48 PM »
That's only because of terrible contracts. They have zero payroll flexibility.


That seems like a gm issue not an ownership problem

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #180: February 16, 2016, 05:41:13 PM »

That seems like a gm issue not an ownership problem

Ownership's gotten them into two of those bad contracts... Zimm's deal -- Rizzo bet on a bounceback and was wrong. That's the only one I'd blame him for. Werth and Max were the Lerners doing. Outside of those 3, the rest of the contracts are reasonable.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #181: February 16, 2016, 07:35:18 PM »
Ownership's gotten them into two of those bad contracts... Zimm's deal -- Rizzo bet on a bounceback and was wrong. That's the only one I'd blame him for. Werth and Max were the Lerners doing. Outside of those 3, the rest of the contracts are reasonable.
The jury is still out on Max's contract. Zim the only one I would consider a bad call.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #182: February 16, 2016, 09:43:45 PM »
My guess (just a guess) is that he goes to the highest bid from a legitimate team (i.e. no repeat of ARod to the Rangers). That leaves the Dodgers, Angels, Giants, Tigers, Rangers, Cubs, Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies, Nats and probably a few that I'm forgetting. I think he's more likely to go to the nats than any one of the other teams, but less likely to go to stay than leave

What is and isn't a legitimate team will look a lot different in a couple years.

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 2415
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #183: February 17, 2016, 06:42:08 AM »
Say hello to your 2019 Washington Nationals:
1. Turner - SS
2. Difo - 2B
3. Rendon - 3B
4. Robles - CF
5. Zimmerman 1B
6. Taylor - RF
7. Kieboom - C
8. Goodwin - RF

Rotation: Scherzer, Giolito, Ross, Cole, Roark.

That's not all that bad on paper...


Stevenson? Also gotta figure the 2016 draftee will be in there somewhere.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63331
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #184: February 17, 2016, 06:57:05 AM »
Stevenson? Also gotta figure the 2016 draftee will be in there somewhere.

I think Stevenson, Goodwin, and Robbles in 2019 are painfully optimistic.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29572
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #185: February 18, 2016, 10:25:42 AM »
Boz on ESPN...said Harper should get $400MM-$450MM offer to Harper...now...and says Boras should take it.  He doubts it is offered, or accepted if offered.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #186: February 21, 2016, 09:54:30 AM »
Short segment about Harper on Sports Reporters today.   Of course Rhoden made it about Baker and Lupica, the Mets' pitching.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29572
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #187: February 21, 2016, 01:08:29 PM »

Bryce hangin' with Kevin Harvick on the starting grid of the Daytona 500...


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #188: February 21, 2016, 01:08:32 PM »
Harper's in the Kevin Harvick pit (pre-race) at Daytona.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #189: February 21, 2016, 01:09:03 PM »
Bryce hangin' with Kevin Harvick on the starting grid of the Daytona 500...



Just saw that too.   Where the hell are you?

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29572
  • King of Goodness
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #190: February 21, 2016, 01:10:57 PM »
Just saw that too.   Where the hell are you?

Sittin' by the phone...waiting for MacClellan to call...

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #191: February 21, 2016, 01:12:38 PM »
Holy hell, Airborne singers.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #192: February 21, 2016, 01:35:39 PM »
Sittin' by the phone...waiting for MacClellan to call...

Expected to see ya in the front row at Daytona.


Offline GNatsNoMore

  • Posts: 1175
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #194: February 22, 2016, 11:00:20 AM »
This is a silly breakaway argument that misses the premise: Bryce's dad loves the Yankees, Bryce loves his dad. Automatic edge. Impossible to know how much it matters.

Bryce's Dad was also quoted in a Washington Post magazine article less than a year after Bryce signed with the Nationals saying, with no caveats, that he wants Bryce to play for one team for his entire career.  You can look it up - in the original article, or I think I posted the original quote and/or a link to it shortly after the article was published.   

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63331
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #195: February 22, 2016, 11:02:24 AM »
Bryce's Dad was also quoted in a Washington Post magazine article less than a year after Bryce signed with the Nationals saying, with no caveats, that he wants Bryce to play for one team for his entire career.  You can look it up - in the original article, or I think I posted the original quote and/or a link to it shortly after the article was published.   
I'd be willing to bet that Bryce's Dad wants Bryce to go to the team that gives him the best chance to win multiple championships. That team does not reside in the District of Columbia.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #196: February 22, 2016, 11:09:56 AM »
I'd be willing to bet that Bryce's Dad wants Bryce to go to the team that gives him the best chance to win multiple championships. That team does not reside in the District of Columbia.
How old is Bryce's dad? Anyone know? it would be easier to put this in perspective if we knew exactly what period he spent his "formative years" (roughly, ages 7-12).

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42996
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2016)
« Reply #197: February 22, 2016, 12:02:43 PM »
I'd be willing to bet that Bryce's Dad wants Bryce to go to the team that gives him the best chance to win multiple championships. That team does not reside in the District of Columbia.

Would the Cardinals pay his asking price?