Author Topic: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread  (Read 325991 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16260
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4225: December 13, 2015, 10:09:33 PM »
I know it's meaningful to the results of the series and to Nats fans and players, but my point is that it is NOT meaningful as a predictor of his future performance.

Storen's a choke artist, plain and simple.  His mistakes in the postseason weren't the result of any sort of fluke; it was all pitch selection and location choice.  He had long, drawn-out innings wherein he was making the same mistakes over and over, refusing or neglecting to make adjustments.  Combine that with his deer in the headlights look, and it's pretty evident that he doesn't seem to have the nerve for high leverage situations.  Could he overcome this?  Sure, but I'm doubting that any executive who paid attention to those outings won't count it against him.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5752
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4226: December 13, 2015, 10:15:02 PM »
Not for a 4/5. They would be much better off going after Leake, Chen, or Cueto

MLBTR has both Chen and Leake getting 5/80. That is 16 a year and Gio is better than them by the numbers. Cueto is obviously better, but even if his market comes back down, which I hope it does because I would be willing to see the Nats give him the same deal Zimmerman signed for, he is still more expensive. Gio is a number 3 on most rotations and at 12 Million is a steal on value. Plus he is controlled for another two seasons.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4227: December 13, 2015, 10:25:07 PM »
Not for a 4/5. They would be much better off going after Leake, Chen, or Cueto

And so would we. Which is why I'd rather trade him and then sign one of those guys than trade prospects for OF help.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5752
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4228: December 13, 2015, 10:30:40 PM »
And so would we. Which is why I'd rather trade him and then sign one of those guys than trade prospects for OF help.

You aren't trading Gio to get an OF or IF. Gio is only smart for a team that needs a pitcher and is designed to win now, or apparently the Marlins.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4229: December 13, 2015, 10:38:29 PM »
Indians want a bat.  I know it hasn't been mentioned, but maybe they'd make Kluber available for the right bat.  Im thinking Rendon for Kluber?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63363
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4230: December 13, 2015, 10:44:53 PM »
MLBTR has both Chen and Leake getting 5/80. That is 16 a year and Gio is better than them by the numbers. Cueto is obviously better, but even if his market comes back down, which I hope it does because I would be willing to see the Nats give him the same deal Zimmerman signed for, he is still more expensive. Gio is a number 3 on most rotations and at 12 Million is a steal on value. Plus he is controlled for another two seasons.

Gio is getting worse while Leake is in his prime and Chen is maintaining. Move Gio to the Yankees and he's a mid 4 to low 5 ERA pitcher. That is simply not worth 12 million, nor worth giving up Miller for. They Yankees don't want Betances closing. Right now they can bring him in to the game whenever they want and use him to get to late inning match ups they want.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63363
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4231: December 13, 2015, 10:45:27 PM »
Indians want a bat.  I know it hasn't been mentioned, but maybe they'd make Kluber available for the right bat.  Im thinking Rendon for Kluber?
No. We need more bats, not fewer

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5752
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4232: December 13, 2015, 11:21:52 PM »
Gio is getting worse while Leake is in his prime and Chen is maintaining. Move Gio to the Yankees and he's a mid 4 to low 5 ERA pitcher. That is simply not worth 12 million, nor worth giving up Miller for. They Yankees don't want Betances closing. Right now they can bring him in to the game whenever they want and use him to get to late inning match ups they want.

Why is Gio magically a 4 or 5 ERA pitcher in NY? He has upped his groundball rate as his fastball declined and his FIP is still much better than his ERA. He suppresses homers and still strikes out more than 8 per 9 innings. He also would have led the Yankees staff in innings last season. Chen has a much worse FIP, much higher HR/9, and lower K/9. He is only better in innings than Gio. Gio is actually younger than Chen as well. The only thing that Leake has is two years of age, but hewas worse by every metric. He even was worse at holding back homers in SF than in Cincy.

Again, unless the Yankees pursue Cueto, Gio is a better option for 3 years at 12 Million a season, and if money is a factor, than Gio seems quite appealing.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43137
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4233: December 13, 2015, 11:22:52 PM »
An article arguing that the Braves should trade Freeman:
http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159300696/atlanta-braves-should-trade-freddie-freeman

I can think of no better fit for this team than Freddy Freeman, a solid fielding, power/average hitting LH batter.  Put him at first, with Zimm coming of the bench and playing 1B/LF and in a worst-case scenario, 3B.

Would Giolito be enough to snag him?   Thinking about a lineup of Turner/Rendon/Harper/Freeman makes me :az:  It gets even better if we resign Span and he's healthy.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4234: December 13, 2015, 11:30:28 PM »
Not for a 4/5. They would be much better off going after Leake, Chen, or Cueto

JA Happ signed for 3yr/$36M.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4235: December 14, 2015, 12:06:35 AM »
JA Happ signed for 3yr/$36M.

Exactly.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4236: December 14, 2015, 12:09:19 AM »
And JA Happ is 3 years older than Gio.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4237: December 14, 2015, 12:09:49 AM »
And JA Happ is 3 years older than Gio.
And Toronto is goddamn stupid.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4238: December 14, 2015, 12:16:34 AM »
And Toronto is goddamn stupid.

So they'd give Gio over $100M?

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4239: December 14, 2015, 12:44:41 AM »
It's getting late and I'm losing my train of thought

Thank God.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4240: December 14, 2015, 12:57:44 AM »
This move would be coupled with

1.  Extending Strasburg 3 yr/$93M w/  4 $32M player options
2.  Extend Harper 15 yr/$525M ($35MAAV) w/ substantial performance encentives, backloaded so we can
Be dominant in his prime
3.  Signing Cueto 5 yr/$120M ($24MAAV) w/$24M vesting option.  I dig the dusty connection.
4.  Sign Greg Holland to a 3 yr/$24M deal (missing 2016 due to TJ)
4.  Trade Gio, Roark, Ross, Taylor, Storen, Papelbon, Werth, and any prospects except for Giolito and Turner for the following:

2 out of Trout, Buxton, Stanton, Yelich, Soler,

1 out of Miller, Chapman
1 of the Rangers available relievers (hopefully Kela, 2nd choice Tolleson)

Acquire a third baseman from the massive player shuffle, which will now be referred to as the MPS. Bryant, Donaldson, Gallo, Seager.  Or trade for Miggy, have him play 1st, and move Zimmerman back to 3rd.
Third baseman could also be Nobuhiro Matsuda, who reportedly could take just a two year deal.

Get a starting MI to go with turner.   Gordon, Kipnis, etc.

It's getting late and I'm losing my train of thought


http://www.wnff.net/index.php?topic=33452.0

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63363
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4241: December 14, 2015, 06:38:44 AM »
Why is Gio magically a 4 or 5 ERA pitcher in NY? He has upped his groundball rate as his fastball declined and his FIP is still much better than his ERA. He suppresses homers and still strikes out more than 8 per 9 innings. He also would have led the Yankees staff in innings last season. Chen has a much worse FIP, much higher HR/9, and lower K/9. He is only better in innings than Gio. Gio is actually younger than Chen as well. The only thing that Leake has is two years of age, but hewas worse by every metric. He even was worse at holding back homers in SF than in Cincy.

Again, unless the Yankees pursue Cueto, Gio is a better option for 3 years at 12 Million a season, and if money is a factor, than Gio seems quite appealing.

Because the AL has a DH.

2012: 2.89
2013: 3.36
2014: 3.57
2015: 3.79

Last year he had the worst ERA, lowest strikeout rate since 2010, worst walk rate since 2011

Noticing a trend? He's probably heading for 4.00 ERA territory here. His groundball rate has nothing to do with it. You move him to a tiny AL park with a DH (in a division with some monsters at DH for that matter) and Gio Gonalez is nothing more than a 4/5.

And Toronto is goddamn stupid.
This.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4242: December 14, 2015, 10:10:26 AM »
Acquire a third baseman from the massive player shuffle, which will now be referred to as the MPS.
   

Fantasy draft every off season?! You're a radical dude! #theMPS2015

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4243: December 14, 2015, 10:14:30 AM »
Just sign a bunch of cheap guys for minimum wage (MLB-wise) and then enter the sliders menu and raise their potential to 99.

Rizzo is just too low-energy.  Very sad!

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63363
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4244: December 14, 2015, 10:17:17 AM »
Just sign a bunch of cheap guys for minimum wage (MLB-wise) and then enter the sliders menu and raise their potential to 99.

Rizzo is just too low-energy.  Very sad!
Rizzo knows he's out the door at the end of 2016.

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3739
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4245: December 14, 2015, 10:19:19 AM »
Rizzo knows he's out the door at the end of 2016.

Hopefully Trump buys the team since he'll be in DC for the next eight years starting in January of 2017.

He'll get us Mike Trout for Brian Goodwin.  He'll negotiate a team-friendly deal with Bryce Harper.  Hell, he'd probably get Werth and Zimmerman to renegotiate the remainder of their deals.

We need a high-energy owner; not the lazy and cheap Lerners.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29601
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4246: December 14, 2015, 10:23:37 AM »
Rizzo knows he's out the door at the end of 2016.


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4247: December 14, 2015, 11:10:25 AM »
Hopefully Trump buys the team since he'll be in DC for the next eight years starting in January of 2017.

 :hysterical:

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4248: December 14, 2015, 11:21:23 AM »
Hopefully Trump buys the team since he'll be in DC for the next eight years starting in January of 2017.

He'll get us Mike Trout for Brian Goodwin.  He'll negotiate a team-friendly deal with Bryce Harper.  Hell, he'd probably get Werth and Zimmerman to renegotiate the remainder of their deals.

We need a high-energy owner; not the lazy and cheap Lerners.

He'd be more Mark Cuban than Mark Cuban

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: 2015-2016 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #4249: December 14, 2015, 11:26:10 AM »
He'd be more Mark Cuban than Mark Cuban
Except he wouldn't let any Cubans in.