Author Topic: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.  (Read 159257 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #225 on: May 20, 2015, 09:13:22 pm »
Just leaving this here.


Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #226 on: May 20, 2015, 11:28:52 pm »
Ok, after tonight he's earned a chance.
Agreed.  His willingness to stand up for guys (Bryce) has changed my mind quite a bit.  I think this is a team that feeds off of that emotional fire and Harper is certainly that kind of guy.  Williams may have finally become a part of the clubhouse that is helping the chemistry and even though I don't love all of his decision-making I have to think he can get better at that and that the attitude he is bringing may really be starting to pay dividends.  This team is scary tough right now.  When we went down 2 runs today, I wasn't the slightest bit concerned and I couldn't have honestly said that earlier this year.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #227 on: May 21, 2015, 01:43:08 am »
Agreed.  His willingness to stand up for guys (Bryce) has changed my mind quite a bit.  I think this is a team that feeds off of that emotional fire and Harper is certainly that kind of guy.  Williams may have finally become a part of the clubhouse that is helping the chemistry and even though I don't love all of his decision-making I have to think he can get better at that and that the attitude he is bringing may really be starting to pay dividends.  This team is scary tough right now.  When we went down 2 runs today, I wasn't the slightest bit concerned and I couldn't have honestly said that earlier this year.

That's how I felt last night down by 4. I had faith those runs would get scored. I didn't have faith we'd stop allowing runs, but I did have faith 4 more were coming.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #228 on: May 21, 2015, 08:29:34 pm »
Agreed.  His willingness to stand up for guys (Bryce) has changed my mind quite a bit.  I think this is a team that feeds off of that emotional fire and Harper is certainly that kind of guy.  Williams may have finally become a part of the clubhouse that is helping the chemistry and even though I don't love all of his decision-making I have to think he can get better at that and that the attitude he is bringing may really be starting to pay dividends.  This team is scary tough right now.  When we went down 2 runs today, I wasn't the slightest bit concerned and I couldn't have honestly said that earlier this year.

Generally agree with your comments, but it pissed me off when he had Espinosa bunt last night with 2 on and no out.   Eat that crap bunt lovers.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #229 on: May 24, 2015, 06:43:48 pm »
Gotta say, I was really impressed with the pitcher-hooking and bullpen management today.

Offline Matugi

  • Posts: 3494
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #230 on: May 24, 2015, 07:15:05 pm »
Gotta say, I was really impressed with the pitcher-hooking and bullpen management today.

Bullpen management has been going quite well recently.  But the bullpen as a whole has been absolutely dominant for the better part of a month.  Quite the turn around.

Offline Truconfidence

  • Posts: 3468
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #231 on: May 24, 2015, 07:53:25 pm »
Gotta say, I was really impressed with the pitcher-hooking and bullpen management today.
Yeah I think he now has a sense for roles. I think a guy like Janssen is going to be really good for us because of his pinpoint control.

Offline PebbleBall

  • Posts: 3440
  • Now that right there is baseball.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #232 on: May 30, 2015, 07:10:43 pm »
I think there are two scenarios with Matt Williams.  Either the team pisses the season away by June, or they win enough games on talent to make the postseason and he pisses it away in October.  I don't know which is the best case since the latter would mean we're saddled with him for another year.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18092
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #233 on: May 30, 2015, 07:42:29 pm »
Did not handle the pitching well. Gio was hurt. Why have him start the inning?

Offline BeltwayBaseball

  • Posts: 926
  • I want to get off Ted & Mark's Wild Ride
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #234 on: May 30, 2015, 09:34:26 pm »
Did not handle the pitching well. Gio was hurt. Why have him start the inning?

If he pulled him out everyone would be decrying him as babying the pitchers, Gio's soft, Matt Williams pulling out JZimm in the playoffs part 2 etc etc etc. Gio wanted to gut it out, he let him, Stras wanted to gut it out, he didn't let him, and he had his reasons for both. Casey Janssen gave up enough runs to lose the lead even had Gio never given up those extra two.

The bigger problem was the 8th itself, I hope Matt's not going to return to his "role guys" BS, Barrett should have been brought in at some point (maybe against Byrd, DP was still very much in order and that has been Barrett's game, DP to end an inning, or strikeout followed by another righty [Cozart] who he could finish off). Especially after Casey Janssen just got off the DL. I don't know that Janssen will ever be good enough to be a "role guy" necessarily, see what he can do then finish an inning he starts with some matchups. These kinds of experiments like Treinen for so many games, testing the waters to see who can be a full-inning guy or not, are better in early April than late May, or when you have a mammoth lead over the competition, which we don't have.

Does anybody know if Barrett was unavailable? I don't remember him pitching more than an inning or so's work in Chicago.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13808
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #235 on: May 30, 2015, 09:48:18 pm »
Did not handle the pitching well. Gio was hurt. Why have him start the inning?

You need to reflect your old school posts better and demand that all pitchers throw 9 innings per game. More if their are double headers.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #236 on: May 30, 2015, 09:59:31 pm »
If he pulled him out everyone would be decrying him as babying the pitchers, Gio's soft, Matt Williams pulling out JZimm in the playoffs part 2 etc etc etc. Gio wanted to gut it out, he let him, Stras wanted to gut it out, he didn't let him, and he had his reasons for both. Casey Janssen gave up enough runs to lose the lead even had Gio never given up those extra two.

The bigger problem was the 8th itself, I hope Matt's not going to return to his "role guys" BS, Barrett should have been brought in at some point (maybe against Byrd, DP was still very much in order and that has been Barrett's game, DP to end an inning, or strikeout followed by another righty [Cozart] who he could finish off). Especially after Casey Janssen just got off the DL. I don't know that Janssen will ever be good enough to be a "role guy" necessarily, see what he can do then finish an inning he starts with some matchups. These kinds of experiments like Treinen for so many games, testing the waters to see who can be a full-inning guy or not, are better in early April than late May, or when you have a mammoth lead over the competition, which we don't have.

Does anybody know if Barrett was unavailable? I don't remember him pitching more than an inning or so's work in Chicago.

Barrett has blown it in the 8th inning this season as well. Casey Janssen was brought in here to be the 8th inning guy. Until Rizzo wises up and gets some muh better relievers, Williams is handcuffed.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #237 on: May 30, 2015, 10:02:35 pm »
I'm pretty tired of the save stat dictating so much. I wonder how many games we won last year when Stoten was in the 7th just because Storen happened to face the higher leverage situation.

Offline BeltwayBaseball

  • Posts: 926
  • I want to get off Ted & Mark's Wild Ride
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #238 on: May 30, 2015, 10:23:31 pm »
Barrett has blown it in the 8th inning this season as well. Casey Janssen was brought in here to be the 8th inning guy. Until Rizzo wises up and gets some muh better relievers, Williams is handcuffed.

Yeah, Barrett hasn't been great, but when he's got a certain skillset, it seems the opportunity was there for him to succeed, and Janssen looked very not-good, I wonder why you don't try something different, especially when Janssen has barely been back a week. I don't even like the idea of an "8th inning guy" unless we trade for Papelbon/Chapman and that 8th inning guy is Drew Storen.

But since I doubt that's happening, I wonder what "8th inning guys" are out there. Last year the Orioles picked up Andrew Miller, are there any of those out there this year? Maybe Joaquin Benoit? I wouldn't mind some sort of matchup ball in the 6th and 7th, variations of Barrett, Thornton, Grace, Janssen, etc, then Benoit 8th Storen 9th. Or, you know, just send in your best relievers against the toughest opposition, like the above poster suggested.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #239 on: May 30, 2015, 10:29:11 pm »
Matt Williams is almost as bad as Terry Collins.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18092
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #240 on: May 30, 2015, 11:55:10 pm »
I had the Reds announcers...first thing they said  was "it hit his pitching arm". Then pointed to Gio flexing the arm as he tried to loosen up. Sure, maybe Williams had a better view, since Williams and McCatty should have checked Gio's upper arm.

The Giants playoff was different: Zmnn pitching smoothly all game.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #241 on: May 31, 2015, 12:20:50 am »


Does anybody know if Barrett was unavailable? I don't remember him pitching more than an inning or so's work in Chicago.

He was throwing in the bullpen but bringing that bum in would be just as disastrous.


Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #242 on: May 31, 2015, 05:13:34 pm »
I just watched the post game presser on MASN sports.com and no one asked him about the 3 ball walk!  Do all the reporters have to be fired too?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #243 on: June 06, 2015, 01:26:35 pm »
freak this cat. Got your Double A pitcher making a debut. Hey, let's let him go out for another inning after opposing hitters are clearly figuring him out. Way  to set your guy up for failure.

Offline Clever

  • Posts: 2342
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #244 on: June 06, 2015, 01:30:15 pm »
:smh:

He threw four innings. It would have been ludicrous to pull him given the bullpen woes.


Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66797
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #246 on: June 09, 2015, 07:55:19 am »
:smh:

He threw four innings. It would have been ludicrous to pull him given the bullpen woes.
Not really. You have a guy who doesn't have the work load for the MLB level, who got hammered his second time through the order. It was pretty obvious you needed to pull him.

Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #247 on: June 09, 2015, 03:50:17 pm »
Not really. You have a guy who doesn't have the work load for the MLB level, who got hammered his second time through the order. It was pretty obvious you needed to pull him.
You do realize that starters in the minors carry the same workload as starters in the majors, right?

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #248 on: June 09, 2015, 03:56:35 pm »
You do realize that starters in the minors carry the same workload as starters in the majors, right?
In the same way that an English comp student writes a ten page paper and student pursuing a masters writes a ten page article for publication. Same length, same workload, right?

Offline mimontero88

  • Posts: 6240
  • The GOAT
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015)
« Reply #249 on: June 09, 2015, 04:11:25 pm »
In the same way that an English comp student writes a ten page paper and student pursuing a masters writes a ten page article for publication. Same length, same workload, right?
Point is that endurance wasn't an issue 4 innings in.