Author Topic: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3  (Read 24783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #25: May 31, 2015, 01:33:17 PM »
Boswell assured us moving to first base helps with your hitting. So what's wrong with Zimmerman?

High ground ball rate

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #26: May 31, 2015, 01:33:27 PM »
There's no way Desmond makes that play.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #27: May 31, 2015, 01:34:17 PM »
Please, Votto is legitimately tough. Like he cares.


He cares. Everybody cares about getting hit with 95. Don't let the false bravado fool you.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #28: May 31, 2015, 01:34:26 PM »
Someone should mention to Ryan that at 30, he's still supposed to be in his prime.

Offline pazzo83

  • Posts: 5348
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #29: May 31, 2015, 01:35:03 PM »
Someone should mention to Ryan that at 30, he's still supposed to be in his prime.

I thought you were taking a break from baseball...

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #30: May 31, 2015, 01:36:05 PM »
He cares. Everybody cares about getting hit with 95. Don't let the false bravado fool you.
Too bad Roark can't throw 95.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #31: May 31, 2015, 01:36:09 PM »
Figures that Espinosa would strike out against this guy.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #32: May 31, 2015, 01:36:23 PM »
I thought you were taking a break from baseball...
I thought PC was going to kill himself. We all have crushed dreams I suppose.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #33: May 31, 2015, 01:36:32 PM »
I thought you were taking a break from baseball...

He's like all the posters on here who threaten to stop following the team after a bad game or two. And then they come back. Just see the threats during the first two weeks of the season.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #34: May 31, 2015, 01:36:49 PM »
I thought you were taking a break from baseball...

He's gettin' his pisstivity in order.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #35: May 31, 2015, 01:36:54 PM »
Figures that Espinosa would strike out against this guy.
We shouldn't be striking out more than 3 times the entire time this guy is in the game.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #36: May 31, 2015, 01:37:03 PM »
I thought you were taking a break from baseball...

I'm limiting my post in the GDT....and thanks to you, I just wasted a post.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #37: May 31, 2015, 01:37:16 PM »
Too bad Roark can't throw 95.

He can and has. But you're missing the point.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #38: May 31, 2015, 01:37:43 PM »
He can and has. But you're missing the point.
The point was that Votta shaked it off and won't miss a game like our primadonna nag boy.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #39: May 31, 2015, 01:37:49 PM »
Robert called Taylor Tanner   ...

Offline pazzo83

  • Posts: 5348
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #40: May 31, 2015, 01:37:53 PM »
Nice, turn the lineup over.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #41: May 31, 2015, 01:38:20 PM »
Can Tanner play first?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #42: May 31, 2015, 01:38:29 PM »
And Heanley needs to go.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17666
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #43: May 31, 2015, 01:38:32 PM »
crap

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #44: May 31, 2015, 01:38:48 PM »
I don't have a problem with sending him there.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #45: May 31, 2015, 01:39:29 PM »
I'm limiting my post in the GDT....and thanks to you, I just wasted a post.

Well played.

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3170
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #46: May 31, 2015, 01:39:50 PM »
Figures that Espinosa would strike out against this guy.

He is back to looking horrible, IMO

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #47: May 31, 2015, 01:39:58 PM »
Youd think with MT's speed he could score there.

Unfortunate

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4996
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #48: May 31, 2015, 01:40:03 PM »
I don't have a problem with sending him there.

I would have sent him too.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63327
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 3
« Reply #49: May 31, 2015, 01:40:09 PM »
I don't have a problem with sending him there.
Pitcher struggling, one of the best  hitters coming up. No reason to send him.