Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2  (Read 16095 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5925
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #200: April 11, 2007, 09:54:29 PM »
come on Bellie, we need some of your clutch stuff here

Offline Ericas Nats

  • Posts: 2410
  • Only Nationals fan in Seattle! :)
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #201: April 11, 2007, 09:55:15 PM »



its a celebration.... nages....

we got a run!


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #202: April 11, 2007, 09:55:25 PM »
Alright all, I'm out of here. It's time to prepare for LOST, my favorite show of all-time.


Funny, we watch LOST every night courtesy of the Nats.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #203: April 11, 2007, 09:56:47 PM »
I refuse...I absolutely refuse to get excited only to be friggin pissed off when we end up losing anyways.   >:(

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #204: April 11, 2007, 09:56:47 PM »
Whoever said Church and Belliard should be moved up in the order was correct.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #205: April 11, 2007, 09:56:56 PM »
Imagine that.  The Nats score and the world didn't end!!!


And they score again and again and no earthquakes, floods and flashes of lightning!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #206: April 11, 2007, 09:57:28 PM »
That 3-run jack will be the end of this game.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #207: April 11, 2007, 09:57:40 PM »
Whoever said Church and Belliard should be moved up in the order was correct.
Why would you move up Church?

Offline Ericas Nats

  • Posts: 2410
  • Only Nationals fan in Seattle! :)
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #208: April 11, 2007, 09:57:40 PM »
ohhhhh crap. thanks for the heads up

im a big lost groupie



Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5925
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #209: April 11, 2007, 09:58:57 PM »
come on fickie, we need some of your juice here

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #210: April 11, 2007, 09:59:10 PM »
I thought the day would never come, but I'm pondering the idea of actually benching Zimmerman on my fantasy team.

I was just thinking the same thing.  I don't have another 3rd baseman on the roster.
Ryan Church has been Fantasy MONEY.  That last hit once again moved me past The Chief to take 1st place in BA yet AGAIN.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #211: April 11, 2007, 10:00:30 PM »
Why would you move up Church?


He would be better in the 4 hole for now. I think.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #212: April 11, 2007, 10:01:35 PM »

He would be better in the 4 hole for now. I think.
Why would the four-spot be good for Ryan though?

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5925
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #213: April 11, 2007, 10:04:11 PM »
Its not about as much moving belliard or church up for me as it is moving Kasto or whoever down from the 2 spot. That spot is our mpost unproductive spot of the season. Bellie or Church sould be there.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9421
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #214: April 11, 2007, 10:07:55 PM »
I honestly think we can't expect to win the game if the Bravos score here.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #215: April 11, 2007, 10:07:57 PM »
Why would you move up Church?

My reasoning was mainly that Kearns is worthless (tonight's unexpected hit aside), so a lineup of Lopez-Church/Belliard-Zimmerman-Church/Belliard-Young-6-7-8-9 might actually get something done.  I know Zimmerman isn't doing well right now but I think if he were given the opportunity to be clutch again he might step it up.  Kearns hasn't ever impressed me since we got him, and I don't forsee him changing my mind.  Maybe he misses his best pal in Cincy.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #216: April 11, 2007, 10:07:58 PM »
And they score again and again and no earthquakes, floods and flashes of lightning!

As you wish... as Noah realizes that there is NO WAY this ARK will stay afloat tonight...

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #217: April 11, 2007, 10:09:00 PM »
My reasoning was mainly that Kearns is worthless (tonight's unexpected hit aside), so a lineup of Lopez-Church/Belliard-Zimmerman-Church/Belliard-Young-6-7-8-9 might actually get something done.  I know Zimmerman isn't doing well right now but I think if he were given the opportunity to be clutch again he might step it up.
Ahh but I was asking Spidernat.   ;)

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9421
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #218: April 11, 2007, 10:09:49 PM »
The Braves score.  Game over.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12264
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #219: April 11, 2007, 10:10:53 PM »
The Braves score.  Game over.
You could have written that after the first run, woulda saved you alot of time.   :|

Offline rich_nats

  • Posts: 838
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #220: April 11, 2007, 10:11:05 PM »
This team is beyond help.  Hope that scouting and player development program is doing well Bowden.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5925
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #221: April 11, 2007, 10:11:36 PM »
The 4-5-6-7 hitter are doing alright. Its the 1-2-3 spots that we haven't gotten anything from. We get no runs from the top of the order right there, Wen Lopez gets on Casto and Zimmerman never do their job and advance him.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9421
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #222: April 11, 2007, 10:11:51 PM »
And the Nationals will once again fail to have a lead at any point during the season (the only "lead" was Dmitri's walkoff).

Nice job Nats!  :roll:

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #223: April 11, 2007, 10:12:01 PM »
Ahh but I was asking Spidernat.   ;)

Yeah but....  but....  it was my idea!!  no fair!  :cry:

:lol:

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7172
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #224: April 11, 2007, 10:12:29 PM »
Bowden wouldn't know what to do.  He'd screw that up, too.  He's good at that.