0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jerk! I was saving that GIF for use during the season.
That GIF can, and should, be posted as much as possible.
No, a hypothetical Espinosa at .180 or whatever is still better than a .250 Lombo with no defense, speed or power.
I can't say I'd be surprised if they reached out to Cleveland and said hey, what do you think about Lindor, Cody Allen and Masterson for Desmond?
Only downside I can think of is this incrementally increases the odds we see Espinsoa next year
how about a non-hypothetical espinosa who -.6 WAR over 167 plate appearances vs Lombo's -.7 over 307? the only reason Espinosa didn't 'win' was a lack of opportunity
I'll miss Lombardozzi. I just hope Rizzo knows what he's doing with the offense because I think that's the main concern.
Disagree, Espinosa seemed to suck the life out of this team when he played last year, I was hoping he'd be traded before the new season but that seems unlikely now.
If both played a full amount of games, Espinosa will always be the better player. That's a mind fact, but hell, Espinosa's 2012 WAR may be better than the entirety of Lombo's career.