Author Topic: Offseason moves?  (Read 176171 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kurt Studzuki

  • Posts: 95
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1850 on: December 12, 2013, 05:47:53 pm »
I still want Suzuki back  Do it, Rizzo...

 :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 2415
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1851 on: December 12, 2013, 06:25:31 pm »
Maybe the Nats can play his walk-up song this year...

I still want Suzuki back  Do it, Rizzo...
Your Love by the Outfield or Even Flow? I want Your Love back.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1852 on: December 12, 2013, 07:49:12 pm »
Quote
Kurt Studzuki

:lmao: :lmao:

Offline PebbleBall

  • Posts: 3440
  • Now that right there is baseball.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1853 on: December 12, 2013, 08:18:56 pm »
:lmao: :lmao:

First post since the Suzuki traded thread. 

Online imref

  • Posts: 47634
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1854 on: December 12, 2013, 11:11:12 pm »
Boone Logan on the verge of signing a multi-year deal wit the Rockies.

Offline Kurt Studzuki

  • Posts: 95
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1855 on: December 12, 2013, 11:59:19 pm »
First post since the Studzuki traded thread.

First post worth replying to!  :whip:

:gunz:

Go Kurt!

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1856 on: December 13, 2013, 06:39:24 am »
we could get an ass load for him
Zimm'nn for Goldschmidt.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66837
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1857 on: December 13, 2013, 07:14:32 am »
Zimm'nn for Goldschmidt.

I don't think we'd get Goldy for him. Martin Prado on the other hand . . .

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1858 on: December 13, 2013, 07:51:47 am »
Tweet from Buster Olney: Best offseason so far, IMO (and it's a work in progress): Washington Nationals. The worst, so far: Baltimore Orioles. More to be done.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1859 on: December 13, 2013, 08:27:11 am »
Tweet from Buster Olney: Best offseason so far, IMO (and it's a work in progress): Washington Nationals. The worst, so far: Baltimore Orioles. More to be done.

I'd like to to think the Barves are not doing too well either given they've lost McCan and Hudson.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1860 on: December 13, 2013, 09:08:48 am »
I expect certain teams (mainly the cards and braves) to just be able to pluck replacements from the minors. Hopefully the nats get there one day

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1861 on: December 13, 2013, 09:28:58 am »
I expect certain teams (mainly the cards and braves) to just be able to pluck replacements from the minors. Hopefully the nats get there one day

In the Barves case, you just don't pluck guys from the minors to replace guys like McCann and Hudson.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1862 on: December 13, 2013, 09:32:36 am »
In the Barves case, you just don't pluck guys from the minors to replace guys like McCann and Hudson.

remains to be seen, they always seem to find a pitcher when they need one. McCann is a bigger loss, but there is no way I would ever bet against those two teams finding a back fill for any holes.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47634
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1863 on: December 13, 2013, 10:07:39 am »
Tweet from Buster Olney: Best offseason so far, IMO (and it's a work in progress): Washington Nationals. The worst, so far: Baltimore Orioles. More to be done.

great, everyone will predict that we'll win the WS again!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66837
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1864 on: December 13, 2013, 10:12:20 am »
I'd like to to think the Barves are not doing too well either given they've lost McCan and Hudson.

Trade Zimmermann for Freddie Freeman? :stir:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1865 on: December 13, 2013, 10:20:52 am »
In the Barves case, you just don't pluck guys from the minors to replace guys like McCann and Hudson.

The Braves upper minors were worse than ours.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1866 on: December 13, 2013, 10:23:47 am »
great, everyone will predict that we'll win the WS again!

Dan Pleasac has already called us a "runaway freight train".

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1867 on: December 13, 2013, 10:24:56 am »
Dan Pleasac has already called us a "runaway freight train".

Lerner should get together with Leonisis and Synder to build an offseason hall of fame

Online imref

  • Posts: 47634
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1868 on: December 13, 2013, 10:35:04 am »
Trade Zimmermann for Freddie Freeman? :stir:

FWIW, Bowden was saying yesterday on XM that it's likely the Orioles will trade both Chris Davis and Michael Wieters rather than extending them.

Chris Davis would fit pretty nicely into our lineup.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1869 on: December 13, 2013, 10:47:00 am »
Tweet from Buster Olney: Best offseason so far, IMO (and it's a work in progress): Washington Nationals. The worst, so far: Baltimore Orioles. More to be done.

That's nothing compared to Jayson Stark:

Quote
• Washington Nationals -- We always try to remember not to grade any team's offseason by looking for the team that wrote the biggest checks. And no team embodies why more than the Nationals. Doug Fister may not be David Price, but the Nats' trade with Detroit to get him was "the best deal of the winter," said one exec. Nate McLouth may not be Shin-Soo Choo, but the Nationals needed a left-handed-hitting outfielder who could play left, center or right -- and McLouth was a perfect fit. Jerry Blevins may not be Aroldis Chapman, but the Nationals needed another left-hander in the bullpen -- and trading for him beat spending $10 million on J.P. Howell.

"I really like what they've done," said an AL executive. "They're not big, big moves. But that's a really good team that got better. They should have been better than they were last year. But I bet this year is different. I bet they won't take it for granted this year that they're destined to play in October."

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19504
  • Believe!!!
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1870 on: December 13, 2013, 10:54:50 am »
FWIW, Bowden was saying yesterday on XM that it's likely the Orioles will trade both Chris Davis and Michael Wieters rather than extending them.

Chris Davis would fit pretty nicely into our lineup.
Matt Wieters?? Aren't both of these guys pretty good young players? Why would they be looking to trade them, because they're going to be too expensive??

Offline CurlyW4lyfe

  • Posts: 467
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1871 on: December 13, 2013, 11:03:39 am »
Oh look media hype.  :panic:

Guesses on over/under on unrionic posting in "Fire Rizzo" threat?   :smh:

Online imref

  • Posts: 47634
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1872 on: December 13, 2013, 11:08:47 am »
Matt Wieters?? Aren't both of these guys pretty good young players? Why would they be looking to trade them, because they're going to be too expensive??

yep, peak value for guys you can't afford to re-sign is seems to be when they've got 2 years left on arbitration.  Only wrote this morning that the Braves should think about trading Kimbrel for that reason.


Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1873 on: December 13, 2013, 11:14:10 am »
yep, peak value for guys you can't afford to re-sign is seems to be when they've got 2 years left on arbitration.  Only wrote this morning that the Braves should think about trading Kimbrel for that reason.



we've got a few of those

Online imref

  • Posts: 47634
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1874 on: December 13, 2013, 11:17:33 am »
we've got a few of those

yeah, but we can afford to keep them.  Olney's argument around Kimbral was interesting, basically that he breaks the arbitration models used to calculate compensation and could be due $15 million or more, a ridiculous price to pay a closer, even one as dominant as Kimbral.