Author Topic: Nationals vs Twins, Game 1  (Read 23388 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #75 on: June 08, 2013, 04:31:31 pm »
See.

Playing second base is not that hard.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #76 on: June 08, 2013, 04:31:42 pm »
Tony Rendon

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66972
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #77 on: June 08, 2013, 04:32:05 pm »
Sarcasm or was it actually good?

It was good. Not quite 2009 but a lot more like it than he has been in a year.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66972
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #78 on: June 08, 2013, 04:34:06 pm »
If by line drive, you mean shallow fly ball

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #79 on: June 08, 2013, 04:34:09 pm »
That's why more left-handers (like me) should play 2B.     ;)

Don't have to turn around to start the DP.

Online nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4018
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #80 on: June 08, 2013, 04:34:16 pm »
11 pitches, 4 outs.

12 pitches 5 outs.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66972
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #81 on: June 08, 2013, 04:34:45 pm »
Guess we're not working counts today

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #82 on: June 08, 2013, 04:35:18 pm »
Not enough patience at the plate.

Online nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4018
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #83 on: June 08, 2013, 04:35:22 pm »
Won't matter when Rendon goes DEEP right now.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #84 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:01 pm »
Guess we're not working counts today

Why bother?  All working counts does is make you sweat.  :?

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #85 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:05 pm »
Guess we're not working counts today

Fixed

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #86 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:17 pm »
Rendon :az:

Online nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4018
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #87 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:21 pm »
I'll take a double  :clap:

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #88 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:29 pm »
Well hit Anthony!

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66972
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #89 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:30 pm »
Anthony Rendon: Doubles machine

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 46186
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #90 on: June 08, 2013, 04:36:35 pm »
easy when you step on the bases, anthony

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #91 on: June 08, 2013, 04:37:24 pm »
Sorry, I'm confused.

Explained to me again why Espi was in the starting line-up for the first third of the season?

He could not swing like that in his dreams.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #92 on: June 08, 2013, 04:38:13 pm »
Lombo should start over Berny.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23935
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #93 on: June 08, 2013, 04:38:39 pm »

Online nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4018
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #94 on: June 08, 2013, 04:38:42 pm »
Let's go Shark.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #95 on: June 08, 2013, 04:40:03 pm »
C',mon Roger

Online nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4018
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #96 on: June 08, 2013, 04:40:21 pm »
Nope.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66972
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #97 on: June 08, 2013, 04:40:24 pm »
Shark ain't got no teeth

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #98 on: June 08, 2013, 04:40:27 pm »
Bernadina again taking a called strike 3.

His timing has been off all season. Pathetic.

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1465
Re: Nationals vs Twins
« Reply #99 on: June 08, 2013, 04:40:34 pm »
shark?  more like chum