Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1  (Read 19772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29572
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #100: April 25, 2013, 07:19:24 PM »
Gio pumping it up in the first. I like it.

Quick avatar change there...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #101: April 25, 2013, 07:19:31 PM »
I don't think spider's there.   :)

:shock:

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #102: April 25, 2013, 07:20:05 PM »
Quick avatar change there...
Eh. I liked this better.

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #103: April 25, 2013, 07:20:18 PM »
mike leake is not good enough for me to "understand" them hving problems with his pitches. get some hits, start with SINGLES, no need to hit a hr every AB

Wat?

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31439
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #104: April 25, 2013, 07:20:32 PM »
mike leake is not good enough for me to "understand" them hving problems with his pitches. get some hits, start with SINGLES, no need to hit a hr every AB


Leake isn't pitching tonight.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #105: April 25, 2013, 07:20:40 PM »

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #106: April 25, 2013, 07:20:53 PM »
mike leake is not good enough for me to "understand" them hving problems with his pitches. get some hits, start with SINGLES, no need to hit a hr every AB

Bronson Arroyo is pitching but I guess I see what you're saying?

Offline Matugi

  • Posts: 3494
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #107: April 25, 2013, 07:21:05 PM »
Has it been all off-speed so far?

Offline sph274

  • Posts: 2136
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #108: April 25, 2013, 07:21:12 PM »
  Leake isn't pitching tonight.

crap wasnt paying attention, just judging from earlier probables. bronson arroyo is even worse

edit: total confusion, dont know why i thought it was leake. mybe because im going to saturday's game and was checking probables earlier?

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31439
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #109: April 25, 2013, 07:21:19 PM »
Has it been all off-speed so far?

Not all, but mostly.

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #110: April 25, 2013, 07:21:24 PM »
Steal.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #111: April 25, 2013, 07:21:24 PM »


Leake isn't pitching tonight.

Leake's the Saturday scheduled starter.

Online nfotiu

  • Posts: 5045
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #112: April 25, 2013, 07:22:21 PM »
mike leake is not good enough for me to "understand" them hving problems with his pitches. get some hits, start with SINGLES, no need to hit a hr every AB
You had me worried I was watching an old game!

Offline CurlyW4lyfe

  • Posts: 467
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #113: April 25, 2013, 07:23:19 PM »
Auuughhhhh

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31439
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #114: April 25, 2013, 07:23:26 PM »
Damn.  He hit it hard.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #115: April 25, 2013, 07:23:53 PM »
The ball just doesnt drop for us.

Offline Matugi

  • Posts: 3494
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #116: April 25, 2013, 07:23:56 PM »
At he made contact instead of looking at strike 3.  Progress.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #117: April 25, 2013, 07:24:02 PM »
damn. same stuff.

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #118: April 25, 2013, 07:24:09 PM »
Come on, we have a negative BABIP these last few games.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #119: April 25, 2013, 07:24:33 PM »
Come on, we have a negative BABIP these last few games.

What is that?

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #120: April 25, 2013, 07:25:08 PM »
Quick avatar change there...

Squab is really SuperClark

Offline sph274

  • Posts: 2136
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #121: April 25, 2013, 07:25:19 PM »
that commercial made the pilsbury dough boy seem like a sexual deviant

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #122: April 25, 2013, 07:26:01 PM »
What is that?
Batting average on balls in play. It wouldn't actually be negative. Most people believe it at least in part is an indicator of a hitter's luck, though it's influenced by things like line drive/flyout/groundball rate. A high BABIP would indicate bloop hits and lucky hits falling. A low one could indicate making contact but hitting it at people.

A high BABIP inflates your average. So you look at a guy like LaRoche, his career BABIP is around .300(average) but right now it's .212.

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #123: April 25, 2013, 07:26:58 PM »
Pretty dumb of the Reds to be swinging away on Gio. Why would you do that against a guy not known for his control? You know the Cardinals wouldn't be.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 1
« Reply #124: April 25, 2013, 07:28:34 PM »
Pretty dumb of the Reds to be swinging away on Gio. Why would you do that against a guy not known for his control? You know the Cardinals wouldn't be.


Well hes had really good command thus far tonight.