Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2013)  (Read 100966 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1125 on: October 21, 2013, 08:46:15 pm »
Merriweather gets two games.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1126 on: October 21, 2013, 08:46:55 pm »
Jeez, does it come with any dough

Not too long ago the Redskins offense was so awful that all you got was dough.   :?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66693
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1128 on: October 23, 2013, 02:41:41 pm »
You never get all the layers if you do it that way. I actually ordered one that had double olives, double mushrooms, double onions, double green peppers, triple cheese and triple pepperoni.   :lol:  Papa John's pizza isn't that good to begin with but all the toppings made it not seem as bad.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1129 on: October 23, 2013, 03:58:08 pm »
I like Papa John's Pizza :shrug:

We don't really have any super good local pizza joints. Puccini's on I68 at the Mason's Barn exit, for those that recall it, has some really good wood fired pizzas, expensive as hell though. Fratelli's has an excellent Buffalo Chicken Pizza. Fat Boys' Pizza in Frostburg is decent, their wings are really good IMO.

Go Redskins!

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1130 on: October 23, 2013, 04:12:36 pm »
I like Papa John's Pizza :shrug:

We don't really have any super good local pizza joints. Puccini's on I68 at the Mason's Barn exit, for those that recall it, has some really good wood fired pizzas, expensive as hell though. Fratelli's has an excellent Buffalo Chicken Pizza. Fat Boys' Pizza in Frostburg is decent, their wings are really good IMO.

Go Redskins!

Wait, you have a Fratelli's too?

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1131 on: October 23, 2013, 05:04:40 pm »

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1132 on: October 23, 2013, 10:29:49 pm »
You never get all the layers if you do it that way. I actually ordered one that had double olives, double mushrooms, double onions, double green peppers, triple cheese and triple pepperoni.   :lol:  Papa John's pizza isn't that good to begin with but all the toppings made it not seem as bad.

Wouldn't have pegged you as a vegetarian type. 

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19503
  • Believe!!!
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1133 on: October 23, 2013, 10:46:32 pm »
Wouldn't have pegged you as a vegetarian type. 
What plant does pepperoni come from? ;)

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1134 on: October 23, 2013, 11:10:57 pm »
What plant does pepperoni come from? ;)

Olives, onions, mushrooms, peppers, etc :)   Sounds like a nancy boy pizza.  Not that there's anything wrong with that. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1135 on: October 24, 2013, 12:13:07 am »
Wouldn't have pegged you as a vegetarian type. 

 :nono:  Aim that peg in Vega's direction (especially since he refuses to talk to chicks).  :lol:

Olives, onions, mushrooms, peppers, etc :)  Sounds like a nancy boy pizza.  Not that there's anything wrong with that. 

:spit:  TF always shocks me with his knowledge of forum history.

Aside from pepperoni I don't like a lot of meat on my delivery/frozen pie. I find that most frozen/delivery meat ingredients are pretty awful (especially sausage) so I stick to vegetables.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66693
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1136 on: October 24, 2013, 08:57:09 am »
What plant does pepperoni come from? ;)

The same one bacon comes from :lol:

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1137 on: October 24, 2013, 09:00:57 am »
Fair enough Spider, fair enough. 

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1138 on: October 24, 2013, 09:07:34 am »
Any interest in Jay Ratliff Spidey?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66693
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1141 on: October 24, 2013, 12:32:32 pm »
Any interest in Jay Ratliff Spidey?

Let me guess, veteran minimum plus incentives?  :hysterical:  I'm just busting your chops dude.

But you clearly have me on ignore.

Either way they need to stay away from guys long in the tooth and instead try to acquire young talent (no one over 28).

Ratliff is 32. The dude has played well in both 3-4 and 4-3 systems but don't you think there is a good reason the cowboys cut ties with him? Apparently Jerry Jones loves the dude yet they still got rid of him. However, beggars can't be choosers so if you mean bringing him in to see what he's got and signing him to see if he can contribute for the second half of this season I guess that couldn't hurt. But he absolutely should not be looked at as an answer for any future years. Also, it's probably wise to factor in that some of his production will plummet if he signs with Washington since he won't be facing Will Montgomery twice a year.  :?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1142 on: October 24, 2013, 12:34:15 pm »
at 2-4, plugging in a veteran you don't expect to return next year makes no sense (then again, the division is a smoldering pile of crap, so maybe we're still in it)

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1143 on: October 24, 2013, 12:34:52 pm »

Let me guess, veteran minimum plus incentives?  :hysterical:  I'm just busting your chops dude.

But you clearly have me on ignore.

Ratliff is 32. The dude has played well in both 3-4 and 4-3 systems but don't you think there is a good reason the cowboys cut ties with him? Apparently Jerry Jones loves the dude yet they still got rid of him. However, beggars can't be choosers so if you mean bringing him in to see what he's got and signing him to see if he can contribute for the second half of this season I guess that couldn't hurt. But he absolutely should not be looked at as an answer for any future years. Also, it's probably wise to factor in that some of his production will plummet if he signs with Washington since he won't be facing Will Montgomery twice a year.  :?



Yeah, that was what I was getting at. Kick the tires and see if he'll sign for vet minimum for the rest of the season. No long term commitment.

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1144 on: October 24, 2013, 12:51:11 pm »
The Boys are so far over the luxury cap they will be letting a lot of people go they would rather not if I had to guess. 

Offline NationalHeat

  • Posts: 697
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1145 on: October 24, 2013, 01:19:22 pm »
I think Brandon Browner would be a great get for the Skins. Can't imagine SEA signing all four of their big DB.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1146 on: October 24, 2013, 03:36:15 pm »
I think Brandon Browner would be a great get for the Skins. Can't imagine SEA signing all four of their big DB.
And he is the oldest I think, so he'll likely be the one they let go.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1147 on: October 26, 2013, 07:55:02 pm »
Orakpo should have four sacks against Clark tomorrow.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66693
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1148 on: October 26, 2013, 08:16:48 pm »
I'd really like the Skins to get Alex Mack. They've needed a good center for a long, long time.

Orakpo should have four sacks against Clark tomorrow.

lol, Orakpo will be lucky to get one. Peyton gets rid of the ball way to quickly and the Skins DBs play way to far off their receivers to stop the short throws.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #1149 on: October 26, 2013, 08:37:41 pm »
I agree but a player with the hype of Orakpo should be able to get to the QB when facing a player like Chris Clark.