Author Topic: LaRoche re-signs with Nats  (Read 4667 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #50: January 08, 2013, 03:17:38 PM »
Morse used to play short. Slide him over to 2nd, trade Espinosa.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #51: January 08, 2013, 03:19:20 PM »
:Fry.jpg:

Offline Rig24

  • Posts: 11
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #52: January 08, 2013, 03:21:31 PM »
Sooooo, what am I to do with my Morse bobblehead??

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #53: January 08, 2013, 03:21:50 PM »
If anything, Laroche is detrement because he's a lefty. He can't hit left handed pitchers.

Doesn't matter much because (a) hitting  behind Zimmerman make Zimmerman a better batter against righties, (b) he's only going to face a lefty 25-30% of the time, and (c) when he does face a lefty, Zimmernman will pick up the slack.

It's the same thing as with Harper following Werth. Harper made Werth a better leadoff man.


Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #54: January 08, 2013, 03:26:20 PM »

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #55: January 08, 2013, 03:28:15 PM »
morse bat at 2B > espinosa bat at 2B

8)

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #56: January 08, 2013, 03:36:00 PM »
morse bat at 2B > espinosa bat at 2B

It wasn't a serious suggestion. Morse at second would transform our infield from one of the best in the NL to one of the worst.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #57: January 08, 2013, 03:36:51 PM »
It wasn't a serious suggestion. Morse at second would transform our infield from one of the best in the NL to one of the worst.

and it wasn't a serious response (although i am not in espy camp)

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #58: January 08, 2013, 03:39:36 PM »
and it wasn't a serious response (although i am not in espy camp)

Nor am I.  I would much prefer an average second baseman with offensive production. But not a butcher.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #59: January 08, 2013, 03:43:04 PM »
Nor am I.  I would much prefer an average second baseman with offensive production. But not a butcher.

yeah no crap sherlock.  morse isn't playing 2B.

Offline aussienatsfan

  • Posts: 7094
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #60: January 08, 2013, 03:52:45 PM »
I'll miss Michael, he was one of my favorites, but to be honest these things happen and we ain't changing it so I wish him well and hope ALR can produce again

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #61: January 08, 2013, 03:53:20 PM »
slateman needs to stop posting

:rofl:

Morse used to play short. Slide him over to 2nd, trade Espinosa.

:doh:

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5059
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #62: January 08, 2013, 03:56:39 PM »
What is the net swing in runs?  I.e. runs saved on defense vs. those we lose by losing Morse.  My bet is it's negative.

I don't think you can accurately predict Morse's offence.  If he repeats 2011, then it is a big loss.  If he's going to be a .791 ops, then losing him, his defense in lf, and his painful slowness on the bases is a net positive for sure.  I don't see any way to make a good educated guess on where he'll settle in as a hitter with only one full season at age 30.  At least with Laroche, you know at worst he'll be a decent hitter with some pop and gold glove defence.

I definitely think all things considered Laroche and Span is a good bet to be a net positive over Morse Laroche.

Another factor is the addition of Span can allow for some more manufactured runs vs relying so much on power.  I think a balanced offence has advantages

Also, it seems that a team that has a great starting rotation benefits more from great defense.  It Allows us to keep the starters in the game longer, and get more innings in over a year.  Maybe keeps them a bit healthier too by cutting down on the long innings.


Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #63: January 08, 2013, 04:01:17 PM »
:doh:

I'm playing chess, you're playing checkers.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #64: January 08, 2013, 04:38:40 PM »
So glad LaRoche is back! It stinks for Morse since I like him too but winning is more important!

Online welch

  • Posts: 16926
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #65: January 08, 2013, 04:46:11 PM »
I enjoy having Morse on the Nats. The Yankees need hitting -- both DH and 1B. Morse would be a popular guy up here. Unfortunately, the Yankees don't have many players the Nats would want...Cano might be the only regular under 35 years old, and Andy Petitte is their best young pitcher. Next best was Christian Garcia, with the Trenton Thunder, except...

If Morse is now "trade bait", do the Nats want any fish that would bite?

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22336
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #66: January 08, 2013, 04:49:54 PM »
:lmao:

I enjoy having Morse on the Nats. The Yankees need hitting -- both DH and 1B. Morse would be a popular guy up here. Unfortunately, the Yankees don't have many players the Nats would want...Cano might be the only regular under 35 years old, and Andy Petitte is their best young pitcher. Next best was Christian Garcia, with the Trenton Thunder, except...

If Morse is now "trade bait", do the Nats want any fish that would bite?

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17742
  • babble on
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #67: January 08, 2013, 04:57:30 PM »
If batting .251 with 24 HR/84 RBI in only 123 games is "bad", then I guess so.

The Yankees need hitting -- ... and 1B.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #68: January 08, 2013, 04:58:24 PM »
LOL

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #69: January 08, 2013, 04:58:41 PM »
Andy Petitte is their best young pitcher.

?

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21666
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #70: January 08, 2013, 05:02:48 PM »
I enjoy having Morse on the Nats. The Yankees need hitting -- 1B.

They have a guy with 3 years left at $22.5 million per with a full no trade clause

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 64049
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #71: January 08, 2013, 05:05:21 PM »
slateman needs to stop posting

Hammonds needs to quit being an Oriole nag

Doesn't matter much because (a) hitting  behind Zimmerman make Zimmerman a better batter against righties, (b) he's only going to face a lefty 25-30% of the time, and (c) when he does face a lefty, Zimmernman will pick up the slack.

It's the same thing as with Harper following Werth. Harper made Werth a better leadoff man.

If it doesn't matter, then who gives a crap about lefty power? Still doesn't change the fact that Morse is a much better hitter than Laroche.

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4751
  • Natitude
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #72: January 08, 2013, 05:07:52 PM »
I like it. Just hope we could keep Morse/Take On Me. Obviously not betting on it.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43981
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #73: January 08, 2013, 05:14:06 PM »
ESPN just said the contract includes a mutual 3rd year.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43981
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: LaRoche re-signs with Nats
« Reply #74: January 08, 2013, 05:15:12 PM »
If only ALR had picked MMMBop by Hanson for his walk-up music, then this move would have been unanimously loved by our fanbase. 

Reminder - LaRoche was responsible for this: