Pages: 1 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 216   Go Down

Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 281799 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3500 on: January 19, 2012, 09:59:38 pm »
Quote from: PatsNats28 on January 19, 2012, 09:56:14 pm
At this point, I just skim this thread for tweets... I'm pretty sure 95% of the posts at this point are worthless.

your posts are worthless, hey-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3501 on: January 19, 2012, 10:10:20 pm »
Quote from: hammondsnats on January 19, 2012, 09:59:38 pm
your posts are worthless, hey-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

yup so i don't read them, just write them
Logged

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3502 on: January 19, 2012, 10:13:26 pm »
sign prince fielder
Logged

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3503 on: January 19, 2012, 10:17:28 pm »
GIMME FIELDER NAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8145
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3504 on: January 19, 2012, 10:23:46 pm »
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3505 on: January 19, 2012, 10:55:56 pm »
I think Boras would be willing to have Fielder go into spring training without a contract and see what develops rather than "lose" to the Nationals.
Logged

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3506 on: January 19, 2012, 11:42:33 pm »
Kind of odd that there hasn't been any real news on him recently.
Logged

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 2415
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3507 on: January 19, 2012, 11:53:56 pm »
Your breaking my balls here Fielder!
Logged

Online imref

  • Posts: 47565
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3508 on: January 19, 2012, 11:56:07 pm »
Just a hunch and a wild guess: by the end of tomorrow Fielder signs with a team that isn't Texas or Washington.  7/$160
Logged

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3509 on: January 20, 2012, 12:01:28 am »
I'm blocking you if that happens!
Logged

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3510 on: January 20, 2012, 12:25:15 am »
Good night my fellow Nationalians. SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!
Logged

Online DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3511 on: January 20, 2012, 12:46:28 am »
I think there have been no fewer than 28 hunches posted about when this cat will sign.  Harold Camping is more accurate than that. When it happens it'll happen.
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3512 on: January 20, 2012, 04:31:04 am »
RAWR
Logged

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3513 on: January 20, 2012, 05:40:02 am »
Morning everyone, SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!!!
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3514 on: January 20, 2012, 05:59:56 am »
Quote from: InsaneBoost on January 20, 2012, 05:40:02 am
Morning everyone, SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!!!

morning.

Sign Prince.
Logged

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8145
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3515 on: January 20, 2012, 06:21:43 am »
morning, sign fielder
Logged

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 6101
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3516 on: January 20, 2012, 07:13:17 am »
Quote from: imref on January 19, 2012, 11:56:07 pm
Just a hunch and a wild guess: by the end of tomorrow Fielder signs with a team that isn't Texas or Washington.  7/$160


Agree but it will be Saturday
Logged

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3517 on: January 20, 2012, 07:19:20 am »
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.
Logged

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 6101
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3518 on: January 20, 2012, 07:28:19 am »
Quote from: PowerBoater69 on January 20, 2012, 07:19:20 am
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.

And your point being?
Logged

Offline ¡Vamos Ramos!

  • Posts: 405
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3519 on: January 20, 2012, 07:38:14 am »
Quote from: PowerBoater69 on January 20, 2012, 07:19:20 am
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.

Clint sucks, addition by subtraction.
Logged

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3520 on: January 20, 2012, 07:44:54 am »
PowerBoater69 has bought into the beef agenda? :shock:
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3521 on: January 20, 2012, 07:51:22 am »
Quote from: PatsNats28 on January 19, 2012, 09:56:14 pm
At this point, I just skim this thread for tweets... I'm pretty sure 95% of the posts at this point are worthless.

This post is not adding value to this thread.
Logged

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3522 on: January 20, 2012, 07:51:59 am »
Quote from: aspenbubba on January 20, 2012, 07:28:19 am
And your point being?

My point???  I think that it is pretty clear that for all of those singing to the tune of Sign Fielder, there is no thought of the consequences of such an action.  Are we really prepared to say goodbye to Morse, Zimmerman, Clint, Terrance, and who knows who else?
Logged

Offline Five Banners

  • Posts: 2406
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3523 on: January 20, 2012, 08:07:09 am »
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120119&content_id=26392538&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&partnerId=rss_mlb

Prince could be final piece for Nationals  By Hal Bodley | MLB.com Columnist

""I think our ballclub is one or two players away from being a heck of a ball team," said Nats manager Davey Johnson.

Johnson, the ideal skipper for this young team, said he's keeping an open mind about Harper, "but I'd love to see someone who could sting the ball from the left side and make the ballclub. It will be an interesting spring."

Footnote: Fielder bats from the left side, has stung the ball on occasion -- as attested by his 230 home runs and 656 RBIs after just seven seasons.

Just a thought."



Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3524 on: January 20, 2012, 08:09:01 am »
Quote from: PowerBoater69 on January 20, 2012, 07:51:59 am
My point???  I think that it is pretty clear that for all of those singing to the tune of Sign Fielder, there is no thought of the consequences of such an action.  Are we really prepared to say goodbye to Morse, Zimmerman, Clint, Terrance, and who knows who else?

Well, they're signing me for nothing.  Clint and Terrance are now expendable that I'm on board.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 216   Go Up