Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 210063 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3500: January 19, 2012, 09:59:38 PM »
At this point, I just skim this thread for tweets... I'm pretty sure 95% of the posts at this point are worthless.

your posts are worthless, hey-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3501: January 19, 2012, 10:10:20 PM »
your posts are worthless, hey-ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

yup so i don't read them, just write them

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3502: January 19, 2012, 10:13:26 PM »
sign prince fielder

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3503: January 19, 2012, 10:17:28 PM »
GIMME FIELDER NAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7931
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3504: January 19, 2012, 10:23:46 PM »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3505: January 19, 2012, 10:55:56 PM »
I think Boras would be willing to have Fielder go into spring training without a contract and see what develops rather than "lose" to the Nationals.

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3506: January 19, 2012, 11:42:33 PM »
Kind of odd that there hasn't been any real news on him recently.

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 2415
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3507: January 19, 2012, 11:53:56 PM »
Your breaking my balls here Fielder!

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42525
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3508: January 19, 2012, 11:56:07 PM »
Just a hunch and a wild guess: by the end of tomorrow Fielder signs with a team that isn't Texas or Washington.  7/$160

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3509: January 20, 2012, 12:01:28 AM »
I'm blocking you if that happens!

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3510: January 20, 2012, 12:25:15 AM »
Good night my fellow Nationalians. SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3511: January 20, 2012, 12:46:28 AM »
I think there have been no fewer than 28 hunches posted about when this cat will sign.  Harold Camping is more accurate than that. When it happens it'll happen.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3512: January 20, 2012, 04:31:04 AM »
RAWR

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3513: January 20, 2012, 05:40:02 AM »
Morning everyone, SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!!!

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3514: January 20, 2012, 05:59:56 AM »
Morning everyone, SIGN FIELDER!!!!!!!!

morning.

Sign Prince.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7931
  • The one true ace
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3515: January 20, 2012, 06:21:43 AM »
morning, sign fielder

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5560
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3516: January 20, 2012, 07:13:17 AM »
Just a hunch and a wild guess: by the end of tomorrow Fielder signs with a team that isn't Texas or Washington.  7/$160


Agree but it will be Saturday

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14265
    • Twitter
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3517: January 20, 2012, 07:19:20 AM »
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5560
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3518: January 20, 2012, 07:28:19 AM »
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.

And your point being?

Offline ¡Vamos Ramos!

  • Posts: 405
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3519: January 20, 2012, 07:38:14 AM »
My concerns this morning with the downstream impact of the Fielder signing reach a bit beyond the 25 man roster; it has been well established that certain members of the Nats Pack have watched their salaries grow larger than many of the players, which means that as a cost savings move the old man may feel compelled to cut Clint and Terrance, leaving the team in the unenviable position of having only female cheerleaders available on gamedays to whip up fan support.

Clint sucks, addition by subtraction.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3520: January 20, 2012, 07:44:54 AM »
PowerBoater69 has bought into the beef agenda? :shock:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33783
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3521: January 20, 2012, 07:51:22 AM »
At this point, I just skim this thread for tweets... I'm pretty sure 95% of the posts at this point are worthless.

This post is not adding value to this thread.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14265
    • Twitter
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3522: January 20, 2012, 07:51:59 AM »
And your point being?

My point???  I think that it is pretty clear that for all of those singing to the tune of Sign Fielder, there is no thought of the consequences of such an action.  Are we really prepared to say goodbye to Morse, Zimmerman, Clint, Terrance, and who knows who else?

Offline Five Banners

  • Posts: 2242
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3523: January 20, 2012, 08:07:09 AM »
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120119&content_id=26392538&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&partnerId=rss_mlb

Prince could be final piece for Nationals  By Hal Bodley | MLB.com Columnist

""I think our ballclub is one or two players away from being a heck of a ball team," said Nats manager Davey Johnson.

Johnson, the ideal skipper for this young team, said he's keeping an open mind about Harper, "but I'd love to see someone who could sting the ball from the left side and make the ballclub. It will be an interesting spring."

Footnote: Fielder bats from the left side, has stung the ball on occasion -- as attested by his 230 home runs and 656 RBIs after just seven seasons.

Just a thought."




Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3524: January 20, 2012, 08:09:01 AM »
My point???  I think that it is pretty clear that for all of those singing to the tune of Sign Fielder, there is no thought of the consequences of such an action.  Are we really prepared to say goodbye to Morse, Zimmerman, Clint, Terrance, and who knows who else?

Well, they're signing me for nothing.  Clint and Terrance are now expendable that I'm on board.