Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25   Go Down

Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 2  (Read 15886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35131
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #200: August 17, 2011, 08:19:33 PM »
Anyone want to chip in on the cut Werth fund. Million a day could send him packing.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #201: August 17, 2011, 08:19:46 PM »
Quote from: tomterp on August 17, 2011, 08:16:57 PM
Why players love maple bats I have no idea.  No telling how much velocity is lost on contact when the bats break. 

Well, a lot - it's like the crumple zone in a car, except it sucks.
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33843
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #202: August 17, 2011, 08:19:48 PM »
Quote from: blue911 on August 17, 2011, 08:19:06 PM
Most players try to keep the bat in one piece

They fail, miserably.
Logged

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31635
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #203: August 17, 2011, 08:20:44 PM »
Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on August 17, 2011, 08:19:33 PM
Anyone want to chip in on the cut Werth fund. Million a day could send him packing.
  Maybe Philly will take him back...

Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #204: August 17, 2011, 08:21:11 PM »
Quote from: blue911 on August 17, 2011, 08:19:06 PM
Most players try to keep the bat in one piece

Don't we all?
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #205: August 17, 2011, 08:22:13 PM »
Quote from: RobDibblesGhost on August 17, 2011, 08:20:44 PM
  Maybe Philly will take him back...

(Image removed from quote.)
No one wants that bum. I truly can't believe he's this bad. What happened from last season to this season?

Why can't he hit anymore? He used to be a professional hitter in Philly. Now he just looks lost.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #206: August 17, 2011, 08:22:30 PM »
And that loser is going to be making $21 million when he's 37 years old!

...another reason to fire Rizzo.
Logged

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63873
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #207: August 17, 2011, 08:23:22 PM »
Come on Detwiler ... pull it together
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #208: August 17, 2011, 08:23:35 PM »
Quote from: blue911 on August 17, 2011, 08:19:06 PM
Most players try to keep the bat in one piece

Quote from: mitlen on August 17, 2011, 08:21:11 PM
Don't we all?

I don't mind my bat going into a couple of "pieces".  :lol:
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #209: August 17, 2011, 08:24:26 PM »
Do we have a reason why Werth's contract is backloaded? Was an explanation ever given?
Logged

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #210: August 17, 2011, 08:25:23 PM »
Quote from: PC on August 17, 2011, 08:24:26 PM
Do we have a reason why Werth's contract is backloaded? Was an explanation ever given?

to sign other high priced talent like Stairs, Hairston.....
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #211: August 17, 2011, 08:26:21 PM »
Quote from: PC on August 17, 2011, 08:24:26 PM
Do we have a reason why Werth's contract is backloaded? Was an explanation ever given?

Probably hoping for "salary relief" somewhere down the line.   :lol:   :stir:
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #212: August 17, 2011, 08:26:25 PM »
Shhhh ... Debbi
Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #213: August 17, 2011, 08:26:28 PM »
Who lasts longer - Rizzo or Werth?
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #214: August 17, 2011, 08:27:11 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on August 17, 2011, 08:23:35 PM
I don't mind my bat going into a couple of "pieces".  :lol:
Quote from: MarquisDeSade on August 17, 2011, 08:26:28 PM
Who lasts longer - Rizzo or Werth?
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #215: August 17, 2011, 08:27:51 PM »
Quote from: MarquisDeSade on August 17, 2011, 08:26:28 PM
Who lasts longer - Rizzo or Werth?

:shock:  And Wang isn't even pitching tonight.
Logged

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23905
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #216: August 17, 2011, 08:27:57 PM »
Ross Detwiler
K K K K K K K
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #217: August 17, 2011, 08:28:45 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on August 17, 2011, 08:27:51 PM
:shock:  And Wang isn't even pitching tonight.

It's downhill now boyz.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #218: August 17, 2011, 08:28:51 PM »
SAFE!!!
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #219: August 17, 2011, 08:29:00 PM »
Horrible call, just what we need. He beat the throw clearly.
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22334
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #220: August 17, 2011, 08:29:32 PM »
Safe.
Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #221: August 17, 2011, 08:29:56 PM »
The Gorz®?  :hang:
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33843
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #222: August 17, 2011, 08:30:09 PM »
Quote from: PC on August 17, 2011, 08:24:26 PM
Do we have a reason why Werth's contract is backloaded? Was an explanation ever given?

I could offer two reasons:

1) lower NPV (Net Present Value)
2) escalates in later years when club expects to be more competitive, and will be generating higher revenues as a result.  Thus, higher expenses will match with greater revenues.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #223: August 17, 2011, 08:30:21 PM »
That would have been a GIDP anyway.  :|
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22334
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Nationals vs. Reds, Game 2
« Reply #224: August 17, 2011, 08:30:21 PM »
Well, prolly would have been a DP anyway.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 25   Go Up