Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 11815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #50: May 18, 2011, 07:30:26 PM »
If they don't get 5 in do they pick up where they left off tomorrow?
  Nope.  It's all erased and they start from scratch whenever they reschedule it.  The only time they would suspend a game to pick it up later would be if it's tied after 5 innings (or if they are at a point where the visiting team took a lead but the home team had not gotten their chance in the bottom of the inning).

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #51: May 18, 2011, 07:30:47 PM »
Morse sucks dick!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #52: May 18, 2011, 07:30:57 PM »
If they don't get 5 in do they pick up where they left off tomorrow?

I'm not sure about that. Didn't we have a scenario one year against Houston in which we resumed a game?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #53: May 18, 2011, 07:31:23 PM »
Niese has a fetus face

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #54: May 18, 2011, 07:31:25 PM »

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #55: May 18, 2011, 07:31:40 PM »
Great to see Morse pull the ball there.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #56: May 18, 2011, 07:31:41 PM »
  Nope.  It's all erased and they start from scratch whenever they reschedule it.  The only time they would suspend a game to pick it up later would be if it's tied after 5 innings (or if they are at a point where the visiting team took a lead but the home team had not gotten their chance in the bottom of the inning).
Watch, the Mets will lead by 1 after 4.5 and then it will rain out. :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #57: May 18, 2011, 07:32:04 PM »
that's the morse we know :clap:

SF ... destin hood with his 10th double of the year!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #58: May 18, 2011, 07:32:40 PM »
Niese has a fetus face

That's freaked up. 

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #59: May 18, 2011, 07:32:41 PM »
Why did they have the #7 hitter bunt? Wasted out...if Hairston doesn't do anything, we don't score...

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #60: May 18, 2011, 07:33:07 PM »
Bunt for a hit?

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #61: May 18, 2011, 07:33:13 PM »
Bring him in Hairston.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #62: May 18, 2011, 07:33:26 PM »
jerry that's right down the plate

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #63: May 18, 2011, 07:33:43 PM »
i hate this freakin team

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #64: May 18, 2011, 07:33:48 PM »
Wow.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31455
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #65: May 18, 2011, 07:34:00 PM »
Why did they have the #7 hitter bunt? Wasted out...if Hairston doesn't do anything, we don't score...
  Now Gorzellany has to get a hit.  We won't score.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #66: May 18, 2011, 07:34:00 PM »
And that's why you don't bunt! Stupid jerks

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #67: May 18, 2011, 07:34:16 PM »
Why did they have the #7 hitter bunt? Wasted out...if Hairston doesn't do anything, we don't score...
and look how well it paid off

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #68: May 18, 2011, 07:34:20 PM »
The Nats are a damn good team.   8)

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #69: May 18, 2011, 07:34:34 PM »
Damnit Hairston. Decent hit by Gorzy, too.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #70: May 18, 2011, 07:34:38 PM »
worst loss ever

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #71: May 18, 2011, 07:35:21 PM »
Riggleman blew that inning having Espy bunt. Let the guy try to drive the freaking run in with the 8 and 9 hitters behind him! This is common sense

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #72: May 18, 2011, 07:35:23 PM »
you can't lose to this mets team.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #73: May 18, 2011, 07:35:56 PM »
Riggleman blew that inning having Espy bunt. Let the guy try to drive the freaking run in with the 8 and 9 hitters behind him! This is common sense

see there i agree with you.  when 8/9 are following a sac bunt, you're in deep crap.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #74: May 18, 2011, 07:36:05 PM »
i hate this freakin team

Quote
:worship: Hammondsnats :w:

I love this team

:lmao: