Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)  (Read 55248 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline machpost

  • Posts: 709
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #450 on: July 22, 2011, 02:47:22 pm »
Even though he was a douche here I'm kinda happy to see Nyjer turn his career around in Milwaukee.

It's probably only a matter of time before he

a) regresses at the plate,
b) makes another monumentally stupid mistake in the outfield,
c) has another temper tantrum and nearly gets his ass kicked by a pitcher twice his size,
d) says something stupid to the media,
e) all of the above

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #451 on: July 24, 2011, 10:40:49 pm »
Pos                          G   PA   AB   R  H  2B 3B HR  RBI SB CS BB SO   BA   OBP  SLG
UT  Emilio Bonifacio   91 355  307 47 90  15  4   1   15  21  4  38  69  .293 .371 .378

Coming to a theater near you

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47473
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #452 on: July 24, 2011, 11:09:22 pm »
Willy Mo released - upgrade over Stairs?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #453 on: July 24, 2011, 11:17:24 pm »
Pos                          G   PA   AB   R  H  2B 3B HR  RBI SB CS BB SO   BA   OBP  SLG
UT  Emilio Bonifacio   91 355  307 47 90  15  4   1   15  21  4  38  69  .293 .371 .378

Coming to a theater near you

He can't slug for crap, but otherwise he makes a nice leadoff man.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #454 on: July 25, 2011, 11:51:11 am »
That's a pretty impresive line for Can'tFeelio MyFaceio. 

Can't believe he's lasted this long with the Fish.  I thought he'd wash out in short order after we traded him.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #455 on: July 25, 2011, 11:23:57 pm »
He can't slug for crap, but otherwise he makes a nice leadoff man.

His SLG Pct is higher than Jayson Werth, Ian Desmond, Roger Bernadina and Rick Ankiel

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #456 on: July 25, 2011, 11:45:07 pm »
His SLG Pct is higher than Jayson Werth, Ian Desmond, Roger Bernadina and Rick Ankiel

I didn't know those four guys were slugging percentages ;)

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #457 on: July 26, 2011, 12:23:32 am »
His SLG Pct is higher than Jayson Werth, Ian Desmond, Roger Bernadina and Rick Ankiel

That's misleading, it's because of his huge BA.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #458 on: July 26, 2011, 06:23:00 am »
That's misleading, it's because of his huge BA.

Which is also better than those four guys...

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #459 on: July 26, 2011, 08:47:31 am »
Which is also better than those four guys...

:hurr:

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #460 on: July 26, 2011, 09:06:41 am »

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #461 on: July 26, 2011, 10:09:47 am »
MDS, we should start a, The "Former Nats fan Watch" thread in honor of you 8)

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #462 on: July 26, 2011, 10:16:29 am »
Sorry, just pointing out that PA was wrong.  Just like the "elimination" of the Marlins...

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #463 on: July 26, 2011, 11:19:27 am »
Sorry, just pointing out that PA was wrong.  Just like the "elimination" of the Marlins...

It's because you are cherry picking stats. His ISO cant be higher than frigging Espinsoa.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #464 on: July 26, 2011, 11:22:04 am »
It's because you are cherry picking stats. His ISO cant be higher than frigging Espinsoa.

Let's break this down for you. 

You stated: That's misleading, it's because of his huge BA.

I replied: Which is also better than those four guys...

Does he not have a better BA than those guys?  I never mentioned anything about ISO or SLG, just BA.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #465 on: July 26, 2011, 11:22:49 am »
It's because you are cherry picking stats. His ISO cant be higher than frigging Espinsoa.

Who said it was?

Espinosa - .209
Bonifacio - .083

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #466 on: July 26, 2011, 11:26:17 am »

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #467 on: July 26, 2011, 11:29:32 am »
Let's break this down for you. 

You stated: That's misleading, it's because of his huge BA.

I replied: Which is also better than those four guys...

Does he not have a better BA than those guys?  I never mentioned anything about ISO or SLG, just BA.

I guess it's because you weren't really responding to what he was saying. The implication with Bonifacio having a higher SLG is that he's a better power hitter than those guys you were mentioning, PA responded by saying that his SLG is higher because his BA is that much better, and then you just essentially repeated what he said.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #468 on: July 26, 2011, 11:32:31 am »
Not really sure if we're on the same page here...

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #469 on: July 26, 2011, 11:45:59 am »
 :popcorn:

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #470 on: July 26, 2011, 11:53:45 am »
I guess it's because you weren't really responding to what he was saying. The implication with Bonifacio having a higher SLG is that he's a better power hitter than those guys you were mentioning, PA responded by saying that his SLG is higher because his BA is that much better, and then you just essentially repeated what he said.

Not implication, inference.  Implication implicates the author, inference (rightly) implicates the reader.  MDS is absolutely right.  He didn't say a thing about slugging, EdStroud did.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #471 on: July 26, 2011, 11:57:35 am »
Not implication, inference.  Implication implicates the author, inference (rightly) implicates the reader.  MDS is absolutely right.  He didn't say a thing about slugging, EdStroud did.

Ok sorry, I forgot who was :poke:

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #472 on: July 26, 2011, 12:00:34 pm »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #473 on: July 26, 2011, 12:01:30 pm »
I just heard a radio ad featuring First Lady Michelle Obama and Washington National Adam Dunn.  :lmao:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #474 on: July 26, 2011, 01:27:32 pm »
Not implication, inference.  Implication implicates the author, inference (rightly) implicates the reader.  MDS is absolutely right.  He didn't say a thing about slugging, EdStroud did.

oh ya i thought it was the same person.