Author Topic: One RF thread to rule them all  (Read 22783 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #125 on: April 12, 2010, 11:23:31 pm »
A 125-ish OPS+ isn't all star level?
Maybe, but the numbers that people put players into the all-star game on weren't at that level or on that pace.  The guy also couldn't stay on the field between injuries and and the minors.  That's not an all-star. 

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #126 on: April 12, 2010, 11:44:37 pm »
Maybe, but the numbers that people put players into the all-star game on weren't at that level or on that pace.  The guy also couldn't stay on the field between injuries and and the minors.  That's not an all-star. 

Here were the OPS+ full season numbers for the OF in the All-Star game in 2008:

Starters:
Braun: 130
Fukodome: 89
Holliday: 138

Manny: 136 (with Boston)
Ichiro: 102
Hamilton: 138

Reserves:
Soriano: 119
Hart: 98
Ludwick: 150
McLouth: 125
Sizemore: 133
Quentin: 148
Drew: 137

Dukes 127 is right up there especially if you factor in his 2nd half where he was a 154. 

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #127 on: April 12, 2010, 11:53:56 pm »
That's fine, but I don't really care what his OPS is when he can't stay on the field.  You can project all you want, but the guy couldn't stay on the field for one reason or another.  The guy has talent, I'm not denying that, but he hasn't been able to harness that and the guy was a clubhouse cancer.  When you're a clubhouse cancer and can't harness your potential, you're gonna be on the job line really quickly.

Offline daveb32

  • Posts: 1860
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #128 on: April 13, 2010, 12:01:59 am »
AND IN THE DARKNESS BIND THEM!

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #129 on: April 13, 2010, 08:37:53 am »
In addition to everything DPM said, Dukes declined in 2009 with an OPS+ of 93 in 25% more plate appearances than he had in his "all-star" half-season.

It's all well and good to say that the FO should've been more prepared, but to pine for Dukes seems silly to me.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #130 on: April 13, 2010, 08:43:25 am »
II think it is a losers mentality to want to play for a winner instead of opting to play for a currently bad team and help turn them into a winner.

Fans that adopt winning teams are known as "bandwagon" fans.  Obviously, there is a player equivalent. 

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45513
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #131 on: April 13, 2010, 09:02:05 am »
With Taveras, it is his historic walk aversion that makes him a dicey player.  If he walked 10% of the time instead of 5%, then he'd be a fine player. This is also a bit of a hunch due to small numbers, but there is a small pattern in his career of starting the season with an acceptable OBP, a bit of SLG, and then falling apart.  Perhaps he loses discipline, but his (PAs) BA/OBP/SLG by month over his career is:

Mar/Apr (482) .270/.333/.387
May      (516) .259/.304 /.310
June      (441) .277/.298 /.351
July       (396) .285/.326 /.333
August   (460) .294/.341 /.330
Sep/Oct (270) .259/.309 /.292

In March/April, he walks 8.5% of the time, but then, he becomes more of a hacker and his OBP tails.  the OBP is mostly BA driven by May.

Historically, he does not have any split on SLG (he stinks against righties as much as lefties).  If anything, he gets on a bit better against righties (OBP v. LHP - .309; v. RHP - .324).  Here is his // line over the last three full seasons and career v. LHP, and here is also Harris's:

Taveras v. LHP
2007   (99)   .371 / .417 / .471
2008   (143)  .266 / .321 /.313
2009   (113)  .219 / .245 /.257
Career (668)  .262 / .309 /.328

Harris v. LHP
2007   (56)    .191 / .291 /.234
2008   (113)  .240 / .327 / .450
2009   (45)    .121 / .356 / .212
Career (381)  .200 / .286 / .301

Hopefully, I've minimized the transcription errors.  Easy enough to say, if he can repeat 2007, then we have a find.  2007 marked his first year of two with the Rockies, then he went to Cinci and here.  Maybe there is a bit to the line from Taveras and Eckstein about getting back to how he hit instead of forcing him to be a slappy GB guy (although his lowest GB% was 2009, his worst year). I don't know what sort of hitting coach changes there were or things like that (I'm too lazy to look them up right now). He probably deserved better luck in 2008 with the rockies when you look at his LD% (career best) and GB% (same as 2007), but his BABIP dropped .034 below his worst prior year (and .074 from 2007).

I'm guessing the Nats are saying, take a mulligan on 2009, and get back to what you were doing before.  We can use you to cover up for Willie's weakness (LHP) and, if you take a walk or two, get some value and restore your reputation as a major leaguer.  This does look like a stat guy call.  And yes, everything I did is from Fangraphs, so that Rotowire crack might be spot on.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #132 on: April 13, 2010, 09:08:37 am »
Fans that adopt winning teams are known as "bandwagon" fans.  Obviously, there is a player equivalent. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Horry

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #133 on: April 13, 2010, 10:06:58 am »
Is there any reason not to throw Willy Taveras anything but 4 seamers?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #134 on: April 13, 2010, 10:25:13 am »
Is there any reason not to throw Willy Taveras anything but 4 seamers?

None that I can think of.  Give it to him 'til he proves he can hit it.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #135 on: April 13, 2010, 11:13:59 am »
Yahoo's Passan says there is racism in the free agent market ... O-Dog said it's absurd Dye and Sheffield haven't gotten fair job offers.

I won't touch on that subject, but to say $4 million for Dye isn't a fair offer is BS.  Dye hasn't received anything above $1 million from anyone else but us ... so it's his loss.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #136 on: April 13, 2010, 11:14:31 am »
Would anyone want Fred Lewis?  San Mercury News says he will be traded or activated this weekend. 

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #137 on: April 13, 2010, 11:14:45 am »
I am now really glad that we went with Kennedy instead of Hudson.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #138 on: April 13, 2010, 12:43:21 pm »
Fred Lewis has played 2 games in right field over the last 2 years, and 29 in his major league career. He doesn't really have a bat (.258 last year).

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #139 on: April 13, 2010, 12:57:50 pm »
Fred Lewis has played 2 games in right field over the last 2 years, and 29 in his major league career. He doesn't really have a bat (.258 last year).
he's a pretty good athlete and has a pretty decent .obp if i remember.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #140 on: April 13, 2010, 01:05:36 pm »
he's a pretty good athlete and has a pretty decent .obp if i remember.

Not enough to give up anything. He's a lefty so your looking at a mature Roger Bernadina.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #141 on: April 13, 2010, 01:06:16 pm »
Not enough to give up anything. He's a lefty so your looking at a mature Roger Bernadina.

yeah but from what i've seen lewis > bernadina

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #142 on: April 13, 2010, 01:18:02 pm »
Not enough to give up anything. He's a lefty so you're looking at a mature Roger Bernadina.

[ ]  Fixed.   [/ ]


 :icon_mrgreen:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #143 on: April 13, 2010, 09:28:30 pm »
I wonder who we'd have to give up for B.J. Upton?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #144 on: April 13, 2010, 10:44:33 pm »
I wonder who we'd have to give up for B.J. Upton?
Gee think they would take Pete Orr even up  :)

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #145 on: April 13, 2010, 10:49:11 pm »
Gee think they would take Pete Orr even up  :)
They signed Logan Kensing, so anything's possible I guess.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #146 on: April 13, 2010, 11:29:57 pm »
Stick Desmond out in right. Can't be any worse than Willy freaking Taveras.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #147 on: April 13, 2010, 11:41:20 pm »
Desi's not going to play in right.  Guz might get the start though.  We need to score runs vs. Philly, not so much prevent, especially with the outfield and Stammen on the mound.  The way Guz is swinging it and with Zim back, I don't think he'll embarrass himself out there.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #148 on: April 13, 2010, 11:54:23 pm »
Stick Desmond out in right. Can't be any worse than Willy freaking Taveras.
That's such a great idea considering Espinosa just got hurt. :hammer:

Offline NatsTheFats

  • Posts: 1036
Re: One RF thread to rule them all
« Reply #149 on: April 14, 2010, 02:36:06 am »
I sure am glad that Guzman is not being a pain in the A$$.  He is accepting his role as a utility infielder.  I love this guy (despite his one-pitch-at-bats).  The only problem his him being less effective being placed in the latter half of the lineup.   If he would could produce in the 7 spot as well as he does in the 2 spot, that would be great.