Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 77   Go Down

Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)  (Read 50829 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online imref

  • Posts: 43911
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #25: March 12, 2010, 05:30:26 PM »
Redskins sign Larry Johnson to a 3 year deal.

Wow.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #26: March 12, 2010, 05:34:20 PM »
:rofl:  3 years? seriously?

the more things change, the more things stay the same.

can't wait for the inevitable LJ vs Portis nagfight.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #27: March 12, 2010, 06:08:25 PM »
Quote from: imref on March 12, 2010, 05:30:26 PM
Redskins sign Larry Johnson to a 3 year deal.

Wow.

WE ARE!

Hopefully he remembers how to run.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #28: March 12, 2010, 06:29:31 PM »
Johnson was by far the single worst malcontent in all of football last year.

this will be entertaining.
Logged

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21659
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #29: March 12, 2010, 07:49:11 PM »
Quote from: JMadIV on March 12, 2010, 05:34:20 PM
can't wait for the inevitable LJ vs Portis nagfight.

the I'm still great in own mind fight?
Logged

Online imref

  • Posts: 43911
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #30: March 12, 2010, 08:57:06 PM »
Quote from: JMadIV on March 12, 2010, 06:29:31 PM
Johnson was by far the single worst malcontent in all of football last year.

this will be entertaining.

Can we dream that they add TO to the mix next?  Then all they need to do is coax Jeff George out of retirement.
Logged

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13788
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, doge.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #31: March 17, 2010, 10:36:38 AM »
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #32: March 17, 2010, 12:14:40 PM »
Quote from: Kevrock on March 17, 2010, 10:36:38 AM
Skins sign Rex Grossman.  :rofl:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5002510

Blech. Facebook is brimming with Joe Gibbs sightings.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #33: March 17, 2010, 02:39:29 PM »
:rofl: all that is left is to trade campbell and make grossman the starting qb. dirtynat's dream come true :rofl:
Logged

Online imref

  • Posts: 43911
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #34: March 17, 2010, 06:30:42 PM »
the new backfield has been dubbed "porti-john"
Logged

Online imref

  • Posts: 43911
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #35: March 17, 2010, 06:31:09 PM »
Quote from: JMadIV on March 17, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
:rofl: all that is left is to trade campbell and make grossman the starting qb. dirtynat's dream come true :rofl:

this probably means they aren't drafting a QB this year, would they pick Clausson now?
Logged

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #36: March 18, 2010, 12:07:57 AM »
Quote from: imref on March 17, 2010, 06:31:09 PM
this probably means they aren't drafting a QB this year, would they pick Clausson now?

Yes they would.  I hope everyone suddenly remembers that Denver's slide away from legit SB contender started once Shanny was given full control in personnel decisions.  I like Clausen as the best prospect in this draft, but adding him to the mix without anything legit being done to help the OL while downgrading the backup RB position, makes the draft irrelevant.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #37: March 18, 2010, 09:53:09 AM »
I still hope they draft a late round RB like an Evan Royster (is he declaring?). To me RB are the most interchangable parts. Or pull off a trade for a Chester Taylor type backup.
Logged

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21659
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #38: March 18, 2010, 09:58:13 AM »
If Rex has any bearing on the draft, I think it makes a qb more likely- he's only on a one year deal, if they thought he was going to be our starter, he'd have a multi year contract
Logged

Offline HerndonNat

  • Posts: 518
    • FSU Football
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #39: March 22, 2010, 03:07:42 PM »
Logged

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21659
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #40: March 22, 2010, 03:12:09 PM »
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #41: March 22, 2010, 03:18:21 PM »
worst signing ever. i said it before it even happened.

you do not win with losers like haynesworth
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #42: March 23, 2010, 12:53:58 AM »
fact of the matter is, Haynesworth just isn't the right guy for the team.

once again, Snyder bought a "name", rather than a player who fits.

Haynesworth isn't a bad player, but the Redskins defensive scheme is just 100% wrong for the type of player he is.

he's a 4-3 pass rusher, and the Redskins want him to be a hole-plugger. occupying blockers is not the strong point of his game, and they should have known that from the start

Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18064
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #43: March 23, 2010, 05:40:48 PM »
Quote from: JMadIV on March 23, 2010, 12:53:58 AM
fact of the matter is, Haynesworth just isn't the right guy for the team.

once again, Snyder bought a "name", rather than a player who fits.

Haynesworth isn't a bad player, but the Redskins defensive scheme is just 100% wrong for the type of player he is.

he's a 4-3 pass rusher, and the Redskins want him to be a hole-plugger. occupying blockers is not the strong point of his game, and they should have known that from the start



when they signed him, they ran a 4-3
Logged

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #44: March 23, 2010, 08:31:24 PM »
Quote from: UMDNats on March 23, 2010, 05:40:48 PM
when they signed him, they ran a 4-3

They also signed a NT already with the intention of playing Haynes(worth) at 3-4 DE.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18064
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #45: March 23, 2010, 08:34:30 PM »
Quote from: Potomac Cannons on March 23, 2010, 08:31:24 PM
They also signed a NT already with the intention of playing Haynes(worth) at 3-4 DE.

who did they sign?

i agree though that he doesn't fit with their 3-4 at all
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #46: March 23, 2010, 08:37:12 PM »
Maake Kemoeatu. 2 years, $7 Million
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #47: March 23, 2010, 08:38:24 PM »
Quote from: UMDNats on March 23, 2010, 08:34:30 PM
who did they sign?

i agree though that he doesn't fit with their 3-4 at all

It's in the thread. Kamoeatu. Good signing, it seems.
http://www.sfexaminer.com/sports/87247487.html
Logged

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #48: March 23, 2010, 08:40:42 PM »
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18064
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2010)
« Reply #49: March 23, 2010, 08:40:53 PM »
That is a solid signing. Haynesworth is NOT a 3-4 DE. Man, that sucks. He's a great 4-3 DT but he does not fit in that 3-4...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 77   Go Up