Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26   Go Down

Author Topic: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)  (Read 32171 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #575 on: February 04, 2010, 02:12:00 pm »
Plan B time! :lol:  Either get Kennedy or let Desmond start the season at short.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #576 on: February 04, 2010, 02:14:04 pm »
Quote
washingnats
 
Don't be surprised if #Nats GM Mike Rizzo made a trade for a second baseman.
Logged

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #577 on: February 04, 2010, 02:14:17 pm »
Yeah it would've been nice to have gotten O-Dog, but I am still happy with the offseason for the most part.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #578 on: February 04, 2010, 02:14:21 pm »
Quote
washingnats
 
The #Nats most likely will go after 2B Adam Kennedy or have a double-play combination of Ian Desmond at SS and Cristian Guzman at 2B.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #579 on: February 04, 2010, 02:14:47 pm »
Does 1 year of a 2B do ANYTHING to improve the club long term? Hudson vs Kennedy, Kennedy may have a better year. What's the problem again?

I wanted Hudson after carefully looking at the numbers, but Kennedy looked good last year. Maybe the Twins offered an extra year? Maybe they want to give us what's-his-name back?
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #580 on: February 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm »
I didn't know Kennedy hit .289/.348/.410 with 11 HR, 63 RBI, 20 SB. That's a real solid line.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #581 on: February 04, 2010, 02:18:00 pm »
Quote from: UMDNats on February 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm
I didn't know Kennedy hit .289/.348/.410 with 11 HR, 63 RBI, 20 SB. That's a real solid line.

Hudson-esque, one might say. Rumor was they had an offer to Kennedy contingent on not getting Hudson already.
Logged

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #582 on: February 04, 2010, 02:18:01 pm »
Quote from: UMDNats on February 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm
I didn't know Kennedy hit .289/.348/.410 with 11 HR, 63 RBI, 20 SB. That's a real solid line.

Yeah, plus he is a good fielder. Just had a down year in that department. If Rizzo knew he could get Kennedy for half of what Hudson was asking for, this makes sense. We're talking about a ONE YEAR deal here.
Logged

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #583 on: February 04, 2010, 02:20:10 pm »
Quote from: UMDNats on February 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm
I didn't know Kennedy hit .289/.348/.410 with 11 HR, 63 RBI, 20 SB. That's a real solid line.

That's pretty solid, and I'd take that especially if he's an upgrade defensively over Hudson.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #584 on: February 04, 2010, 02:20:47 pm »
Quote from: PANatsFan on February 04, 2010, 02:18:00 pm
Hudson-esque, one might say. Rumor was they had an offer to Kennedy contingent on not getting Hudson already.

That'd be cool. Would love to see us sign him this week and focus on trying to get a rebuild SP like Wang (hehe).
Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #585 on: February 04, 2010, 02:21:04 pm »
Quote from: ronnynat on February 04, 2010, 02:18:01 pm
Yeah, plus he is a good fielder. Just had a down year in that department. If Rizzo knew he could get Kennedy for half of what Hudson was asking for, this makes sense. We're talking about a ONE YEAR deal here.
I wouldn't be shocked if it was a two year deal, actually. 
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #586 on: February 04, 2010, 02:22:19 pm »
Hell, at this point I'd swoop in on Bedard and offer him a base of 2.5 million dollars and then throw in all the incentives the Mariners are offering.

It'd be 1 million more than the Mariners offered plus he's familiar with the area.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #587 on: February 04, 2010, 02:26:03 pm »
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #588 on: February 04, 2010, 02:32:06 pm »
ladson just tweeted to not be surprised if Rizzo is trading for a 2b.
Logged

Offline Hondo

  • Posts: 632
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #589 on: February 04, 2010, 02:34:53 pm »
Great, now we can trade prospects for a 2b...sweet!
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #590 on: February 04, 2010, 02:37:59 pm »
Hudson would have been nice but that little voice kept saying "he lost his job to Ronnie Belliard".
Logged

Online Kevrock

  • Posts: 13811
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #591 on: February 04, 2010, 02:47:01 pm »
Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #592 on: February 04, 2010, 02:47:26 pm »
PA I can't believe you would really want Uggla.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #593 on: February 04, 2010, 02:49:14 pm »
Quote from: Dunnkey on February 04, 2010, 02:47:26 pm
PA I can't believe you would really want Uggla.

50%. He has limitations, that's for certain. But rather than arguing about 9 vs 11 HR's, might as well put a real masher into the discussion.

And the cheapers might want to check on all their figures, because a) arbitration hasn't happened yet, and b) the payroll is well above $40 million.
Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #594 on: February 04, 2010, 02:50:26 pm »
I don't really care about offense, I want a good glove.  Hudson > Guzman >>>>>>> Uggla.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #595 on: February 04, 2010, 03:47:29 pm »
 
Quote
@MarkZuckerman: With O-Dog out of the picture, club source says #Nats will look at A.Kennedy but are willing to enter spring with Guzman/Desmond up middle.

but...but..but....HUDSON WAS THE ONLY 2ND BASEMAN IN ALL OF BASEBALL THAT WE CAN GET!!!!  :panic:
Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #596 on: February 04, 2010, 03:50:52 pm »
Ownership discussion has been split off to its own thread - http://www.wnff.net/index.php/topic,16600.0.html

All further discussion in this thread not relating to the Nats 2010 middle infield will be moved there.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #597 on: February 04, 2010, 03:52:45 pm »
I will avatar bet someone that either a starting pitcher or middle infielder will be obtained before opening day.
Logged

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 6103
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #598 on: February 04, 2010, 05:03:52 pm »
Quote from: blue911 on February 04, 2010, 02:37:59 pm
Hudson would have been nice but that little voice kept saying "he lost his job to Ronnie Belliard".
This.....and what a huge drop-off in the second half. Don't lament this as a failure for Rizzo until after Hudson completes the season.
Logged

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: O-Dog (Orlando Hudson)
« Reply #599 on: February 04, 2010, 05:19:00 pm »
Quote from: aspenbubba on February 04, 2010, 05:03:52 pm
This.....and what a huge drop-off in the second half. Don't lament this as a failure for Rizzo until after Hudson completes the season.

Do tell, what huge drop off are you speaking of? It certainly wasn't a drop off in his stats.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26   Go Up