Author Topic: 2010 Offseason Wheeling and Dealing (Read 116204 times)

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1700 on:** January 26, 2010, 08:59:44 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 08:58:01 pm

Looks to me like all the digressive blah blah needs to cease and a couple (or a few) people need to put their money where their mouth is.

Who finishes 2010 with a better record? Nats or Indians?

Place your bets gentlemen, because I'm getting tired of all this biased posturing.

I already bet him over Pinero vs Marquis.

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #1701 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:00:28 pm »

The Indians suck rocks. This "argument" is a joke.

Jake Westbrook?

Good luck keeping him healthy.

The Chief · « **Reply #1702 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:01:08 pm »

@PA - So place a side bet with different stakes. Or somebody else can take it up, or several someones. I don't care. We're all on the honor system here.

But everyone "proving" who has the best roster is getting tired.

imref · « **Reply #1703 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:01:26 pm »

There's got to be some way we can package Dukes and Guzman plus cash for A. Cabrera

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1704 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:01:46 pm »

Nats... but we already have the Marquis bet going.

I've never said the Indians would have the better record.

All I said was the team had more talent than the Nats.

Obed_Marsh · « **Reply #1705 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:01:55 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 08:58:01 pm

Who finishes 2010 with a better record? Nats or Indians?

Sorry. I won't bet against my own team.

imref · « **Reply #1706 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:02:05 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 08:58:01 pm

Looks to me like all the digressive blah blah needs to cease and a couple (or a few) people need to put their money where their mouth is.

Who finishes 2010 with a better record? Nats or Indians?

Place your bets gentlemen, because I'm getting tired of all this biased posturing.

hey, I took Grady Sizemore with my first round pick last year (#10)

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1707 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:02:45 pm »

Is arguing that our team isn't quite as bad as you team rock bottom for a fan base?

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #1708 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:03:29 pm »

I'm not betting crap if it comes to betting the Nats will have a better record than any fricking team. The Indians suck, yet they'll STILL finish with a (slightly) better record than the Nats because the Nats will bone it. They're the Nats. They'll start out 3-15 and claw and scratch to attempt to go .500 for the remaining 144 games of the season.

Besides, I laughed at Linty saying the Indians were "far better" or whatever the hell he said, which is just preposterous.

I'll gladly bet him that the Nats will be within 7 games of the Indians.

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #1709 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:04:00 pm »

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 26, 2010, 09:02:45 pm

Is arguing that our team isn't quite as bad as you team rock bottom for a fan base?

No way, it's what makes sports great!

The Chief · « **Reply #1710 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:06:04 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 26, 2010, 09:01:46 pm

Nats... but we already have the Marquis bet going.

I've never said the Indians would have the better record.

All I said was the team had more talent than the Nats.

No?

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 26, 2010, 07:29:11 pm

It's a no brainer that the Nats are going to have a better season than either of those teams.

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 26, 2010, 07:32:41 pm

That's not true. Indians have a ton more talent than the Nats do.

Its not really close.

Looks like a pretty clear cut rebuttal to me.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1711 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:09:08 pm »

I read PANats wrong.

Obviously why I said 'That's not true. Indians have a ton more talent than the Nats do."

If I thought they'd win more games I would have said 'That's not true. The Indians will win a ton more."

The Chief · « **Reply #1712 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:13:14 pm »

Spin it any way you want, his assertion was very clear, and you asserted that it wasn't true. Untrue binary assertion = only one option.

tomterp · « **Reply #1713 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:14:36 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 26, 2010, 09:09:08 pm

I read PANats wrong.

He seems like the decent sort. Perhaps if you proferred an apology, he might accept.

The Chief · « **Reply #1714 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:16:05 pm »

I don't need apologies, I'm just bored and I don't know why we're arguing about this

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #1715 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:17:15 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 09:16:05 pm

I don't need apologies, I'm just bored and I don't know why we're arguing about this

Because we're bored too and our TV options are Kentucky/South Carolina basketball or The Biggest Loser.

Obed_Marsh · « **Reply #1716 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:17:39 pm »

Yeah. If we should be picking on anybody it should be the O's and their fans.

The Chief · « **Reply #1717 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:17:50 pm »

Quote from: DPMOmaha on January 26, 2010, 09:17:15 pm

Because we're bored too and our TV options are Kentucky/South Carolina basketball or The Biggest Loser.

You don't like Teen Mom?

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #1718 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:18:22 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 09:17:50 pm

You don't like Teen Mom?

Damn. forgot to set the DVR for that one...

JMW IV · « **Reply #1719 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:18:56 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 26, 2010, 07:29:11 pm

It's a no brainer that the Nats are going to have a better season than either of those teams.

no it isn't

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1720 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:20:05 pm »

Quote from: Dunnkey on January 26, 2010, 09:16:05 pm

I don't need apologies, I'm just bored and I don't know why we're arguing about this

Quote from: DPMOmaha on January 26, 2010, 09:17:15 pm

Because we're bored too and our TV options are Kentucky/South Carolina basketball or The Biggest Loser.

I am also bored. Girlfriend not around tonight... so I'm practicing another hobby of mine... arguing for the sake of arguing.

Very childish on my part I might add.

The Chief · « **Reply #1721 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:20:51 pm »

Hey at least you've got a few years more excuse than I do (for behaving childishly

)

tomterp · « **Reply #1722 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:23:19 pm »

Quote from: DPMOmaha on January 26, 2010, 09:17:15 pm

Because we're bored too and our TV options are Kentucky/South Carolina basketball or The Biggest Loser.

Hah, not boring for me. Terps with their 4th win in conference, crushing Miami, while the Caps are enjoying a drama-free 3rd period with a 6-2 lead over the Islanders. And I'm going to be enjoying tomorrow night's game in DC vs. Anaheim in a corporate fatcat suite.

Make that 7-2 Caps.

What an offense!

DPMOmaha · « **Reply #1723 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:23:47 pm »

I think I'm gonna go to my buddies and watch him smoke a pipe and I'll inhale the second-hand smoke.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1724 on:** January 26, 2010, 09:24:17 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 26, 2010, 09:20:05 pm

I am also bored. Girlfriend not around tonight... so I'm practicing another hobby of mine... arguing for the sake of arguing.

Very childish on my part I might add.

Yeah, you strawman/sportsfanned the freak out of that one

I never said the Nats had a better roster. I'm not mad, no worries.

I think Morgan will be the most valuable CF this season, and he was for the 46 games he played for DC last year.

Is a better season place in the division, or record? Finishing strong, or overall # of wins? How about developing prospects. It's debatable unless they make the playoffs.