I think it's safe to say we're NOT the '62 Mets at this point. A better comparison is to look at the '88 Orioles who set a record going 0-21 to start and finished 54-107 (161 games??). They were bad, as I remember. But they had some very, very strong players on that team, too (Murray, Ripken, Boddicker, Olsen - you know who they were). Not sure where they went bad - pitching is the most likely suspect. Anyway, at 100 games, they were exactly where we are at, 32-68. For the rest of the year, the O's went 22-39 (.360) which was a moderate improvement from their .320 at 100 games mark, which is not an unreasonabl guestimate for out Nats. I think we can actually do better and go 28-34 (60-102 finish), which would be amazing, but I doubt it would happen given the lack of veteran pitching.