Author Topic: Tex and the Nats...  (Read 168881 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3100 on: December 19, 2008, 08:50:36 pm »
:rofl: that would be awesome.

its from this



Good Gawd

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3101 on: December 19, 2008, 08:52:08 pm »
They are all convinced that Tex chose Baltimore. He will come to them even if they don't have the best offer.
The Nats have ZERO chance

Quote
It appears that Belkast's original info was correct...We will get the final word.

Ultimately, when you read between the lines, it does appear that the Orioles are the team Tex wants to go to. Remember what AM said at the winter meetings...that if they don't get Tex this offseason, that it will hurt them. From a man that says very little, that comment carried a lot of weight.

Quote
Excuse me Belkast for reading between the lines here, but my sense is that Tex has chosen Baltimore. It seems like they're working on the details, but he has a "handshake" agreement so to speak with the O's.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3102 on: December 19, 2008, 08:52:41 pm »



^What are you guys, 12?  :icon_question:

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3103 on: December 19, 2008, 08:56:12 pm »
the remix:

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3104 on: December 19, 2008, 08:56:43 pm »
would you guys classify Tex as the 2nd best 1b in baseball? i would, behind Pujols. i don't care how many homers Howard hits, Tex is the better ballplayer.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3105 on: December 19, 2008, 08:57:02 pm »
lol at tex taking less money than anywhere else to go to baltimore ...

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3106 on: December 19, 2008, 08:58:30 pm »
would you guys classify Tex as the 2nd best 1b in baseball? i would, behind Pujols. i don't care how many homers Howard hits, Tex is the better ballplayer.
Unless I can classify him as a Nat I don't really care.  :icon_mrgreen:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3107 on: December 19, 2008, 08:59:46 pm »
would you guys classify Tex as the 2nd best 1b in baseball? i would, behind Pujols. i don't care how many homers Howard hits, Tex is the better ballplayer.

Miguel Cabera and Prince have to be in the conversation. I personally think Adrian Gonzalez is better, but his numbers are depressed by Petco and horrible lineup context

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3108 on: December 19, 2008, 09:01:35 pm »
would you guys classify Tex as the 2nd best 1b in baseball? i would, behind Pujols. i don't care how many homers Howard hits, Tex is the better ballplayer.
Yeah
Berkman, Morneau, Howard, Miggy, Fielder, Delgado, Lee, Adrian Gonzalez

Those are my top 10. Probably in that order, or close to that order

Offline eckseid

  • Posts: 855
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3109 on: December 19, 2008, 09:01:45 pm »
Lol, OH made it so you had to be registered to look at the threads?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3110 on: December 19, 2008, 09:09:01 pm »
Lol, OH made it so you had to be registered to look at the threads?

That's because orioles fans are nages. But their delusional posts are hilarious.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7971
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3111 on: December 19, 2008, 09:09:26 pm »
would you guys classify Tex as the 2nd best 1b in baseball? i would, behind Pujols. i don't care how many homers Howard hits, Tex is the better ballplayer.

Actually, Howard is not his main competition. After Pujols, there are several guys that have to be considered. Berkmann and Youklis are in the mix as well, particularly Berkman from a hitting perspective. Teixiera is a top FA for the reason that he is in the top tier of the best 1B in baseball. Things that make him so appealing are that he is younger, is a switch hitter, and posts the numbers from both sides of the plate. Pujols is the best hitter, but is also a very good defensive 1Bman. The fact that Teixiera has the hitting stats but is not a defensive liability really makes him the cream the of FA crop.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3112 on: December 19, 2008, 09:10:32 pm »
Wow, they're convinced they got him - If the Sox sign him, I think that's my prediction at this point (I guess optimism regarding the Nats doesn't come easy) will they be fishing these guys out of the harbor?

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3113 on: December 19, 2008, 09:13:38 pm »
Wow, they're convinced they got him - If the Sox sign him, I think that's my prediction at this point (I guess optimism regarding the Nats doesn't come easy) will they be fishing these guys out of the harbor?
I agree with you.
I just don't see how the O's are any more desirable than we are.

If he doesn't sign with the Angels or Sox, I think we get him. If we lose him to the O's, knowing what we know, I'd be stunned.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7971
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3114 on: December 19, 2008, 09:21:38 pm »
I agree with you.
I just don't see how the O's are any more desirable than we are.

If he doesn't sign with the Angels or Sox, I think we get him. If we lose him to the O's, knowing what we know, I'd be stunned.

The O's make sense from a pure hometown standpoint. DC puts him on the east coast, but the O's are his home team and his dad is a ST holder. if they offered him essentially the same type of deal as the Nats, it would make sense for him to go there.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3115 on: December 19, 2008, 09:36:08 pm »
http://www.boston.com/sports/touching_all_the_bases/2008/12/i_imagine_you_had_the.html

Quote
Boston Globe
Chad Finn's Touching All The Bases
As Teixeira turns . . .
December 19, 2008 05:22 PM

I'm guessing you had the same reaction that I did when you took one last peek at Boston.com or the late local news last night before slipping off to bed, only to get clobbered with the stunning news that the Red Sox were "not a factor" in the Mark Teixeira sweepstakes:

You have GOT to be kidding me. (Followed by a string of unprintable words, occasionally and creatively interspersed with "greedy," "Scott Boras," "sheep," and "Teixeira.")

While I do still like to imagine an enraged John Henry having to be restrained from going over the table at Boras the precise moment the Red Sox realized their trip to Texas would be futile, the situation is apparently calmer and still somewhat hopeful the day after, and the Sox are still in the mix, and possibly the favorites, by most educated guesstimates. The rumors are flying from all directions -- the Nationals have secretly made an enormous offer, the Yankees say they're out of it, the Angels are playing it coy, and so on and so forth --

 :rofl:

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3116 on: December 19, 2008, 09:44:02 pm »
The O's make sense from a pure hometown standpoint. DC puts him on the east coast, but the O's are his home team and his dad is a ST holder. if they offered him essentially the same type of deal as the Nats, it would make sense for him to go there.

The orioles at the very least would have to have the highest offer or at least match the Nats offer - and by all indications -baltimore hasn't even upped their initial offer, which was lower than everyone else -it's inconceivable to me that Tex would take less money to go to baltimore -- if that was the case, this deal would have been done last week

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3117 on: December 19, 2008, 09:45:46 pm »
http://www.boston.com/sports/touching_all_the_bases/2008/12/i_imagine_you_had_the.html

 :rofl:

and who are the educated ones making these guesses exactly? certifiable boston homer gammons and notorious non-media approved destination hater olney?

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3118 on: December 19, 2008, 09:48:41 pm »
http://www.boston.com/sports/touching_all_the_bases/2008/12/i_imagine_you_had_the.html

 :rofl:
Also from that article at the bottom:

Quote
Is Scott Boras the really anti-Christ? No, Drew Rosenhaus is -- anyone who has T.O. as a client automatically gets that designation. But Boras is definitely in his cabinet. Also, Rosie O'Donnell has an argument.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3119 on: December 19, 2008, 10:16:08 pm »
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3782228

Quote
One executive familiar with the meeting said the Red Sox were told that in order to get Teixeira, they would have to offer about $24.3 million a year over eight years -- or a deal for about $195 million. The Red Sox walked out, and Henry issued this statement to the AP: "We met with Mr. Teixeira and were very much impressed with him. After hearing about his other offers, however, it seems clear that we are not going to be a f

Boras, in an interview with ESPN.com's Jerry Crasnick, said the report of a $195 million contract demand over eight years is "inaccurate.'' He declined to elaborate over specifics of the negotiations.

"This falsely portrays what occurred there that night,'' Boras said. "The primary purpose of this event was that it was the first time John Henry met Mark Teixeira. There was a very limited discussion of economic considerations.''

This is getting screwier by the minute.  We have Michael Lynch of Boston TV5 saying that Henry was "infuriated" when told of Boras' demand of 8/195 and now Boras is steadfastly denying he said any such thing. Who to believe??  Maybe it'll all be settled when I wake up tomorrow.  :rofl:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3120 on: December 19, 2008, 10:29:20 pm »
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3782228

This is getting screwier by the minute.  We have Michael Lynch of Boston TV5 saying that Henry was "infuriated" when told of Boras' demand of 8/195 and now Boras is steadfastly denying he said any such thing. Who to believe??  Maybe it'll all be settled when I wake up tomorrow.  :rofl:

My wife is going to kill me- we're driving to her family's house tomorrow and I'm going to be surfing trying to find sports radio the whole way

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3121 on: December 19, 2008, 10:40:17 pm »
This just has the feeling of something that will never end. That somehow we will still be talking about this this time next year.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3122 on: December 19, 2008, 10:50:04 pm »
Roch



It doesn't appear that anything major is going to happen in the Mark Teixeira derby tonight. And the Orioles don't seem to think he'll sign with anybody over the weekend, though that can easily change.

The Orioles aren't preparing for a major announcement. They apparently have not increased their offer to blow away all the others. They're not in "blow away" mode. They're not going to bid against rumored proposals from other clubs.

Once agent Scott Boras tells them what it will take to get a deal done (assuming he's not going to accept the one they've got on the table, believed to be seven years for $140-$150 million), the Orioles can react.

Not everyone agrees with his approach. Many fans detest it. It comes with the obvious risks. But if Teixeira really wants to play here, the Orioles figure he'll allow them to counter any firm offer that he's considering. If he doesn't, well, so much for wanting to play for the hometown team.

We can only assume the Red Sox are offering eight years for around $180 million. If Boras has a better offer, maybe it's coming from the Angels.

I also can't imagine the Orioles giving Teixeira an opt-out clause after three years. They might not contend for at least two. Why would they give him the chance to bolt that soon? If he signs, they want to decide whether he stays or goes.

One thing is certain: You won't find Teixeira and Peter Angelos dining in one of the Texas Stadium suites tomorrow night. And I won't be walking around the club level trying to find them.

JeffCMSB

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3123 on: December 19, 2008, 10:58:30 pm »
Look Chad Finn is usually a very good, smart write...hell he was a Maine Guides fan so right there!!! He as with most of Sox Nation just can't accept that the Sox were not the high bidders. I don't understand it and can't agree less with a notion. I would love Tex in a Sox uni...but you know what...they were a fastball being 1" more toward the barrel of down Dustin Pedroia's bat from going to back to back World Series. Yes Ortiz is getting older and yes Mike Lowell is breaking down, beut the Sox don't NEED Tex. i trust tis ownership group to draft or trade or sign a good to great hitter 2 or 3 years down the road. I don't understand the irrationality of us Sox fans...I really really don't.

By the way...we'll be talking more of this tomorrow night 6 - 8 PM as a Saturday Night Football preview

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3124 on: December 19, 2008, 11:20:09 pm »
My wife is going to kill me- we're driving to her family's house tomorrow and I'm going to be surfing trying to find sports radio the whole way

You need XM - Christmas perhaps?