Author Topic: Human Mascots, Superstitious History  (Read 1428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« on: March 05, 2011, 04:29:15 am »
This is an interesting article I came across at SBNation... It highlights five of the "human" mascots, decidedly un-politically correct usage of people as good luck charms, all but one having disabilities. Insanely enough, Babe Ruth's personal mascot, drunken lout and un-PC guy that he was, is the one that didn't have a disability.

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/3/3/2026923/human-mascots-baseball-superstitiona

The last one was the most interesting, with his fortune telling adventure believing he could pitch, and being allowed to do so. Also, you've got to love a "human mascot" that missed a game because he was otherwise engaged sampling PIES throughout New York City. Definitely worth a read at the lighter side of baseball, as offensive as it may be in today's world.

Re: Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2011, 07:44:46 am »
You know, we can take this PC and "offensive" crap and throw it right out the window. This stuff isn't politically incorrect, it is brilliant American capitalism at its best. All these "mascots" willingly dedicated their time and mojo (if you want to call it that) for their particular teams, made a bit of a living out of it and carved their own niche into baseball lore. What is more American than that?

Four out of the five of them had disabilities and ones that would have probably kept them sheltered, but instead of sitting on the sidelines of life they were able to put their disabilities to decent use and made a living for themselves. Now if teams just made them do it and treated them like dogs then there might be a problem, but these guys did it willingly, the teams certainly treated them like one of the guys and they did it in a different time and age than now. I remember reading articles on traveling freak shows and how circus' and such were not continuing to carry them because they were deemed un-PC and demeaning. You know who was the most upset at this? The freaks themselves! They had lost a unique job to them, the attention of thousands and the few with permanent deformities and such, what were they going to do now?

Other than Ruth's kid, what would those other four be doing otherwise?

I look at this period and niche in baseball and I don't see offensive material. I see some remarkable people.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2011, 08:14:42 am »
They missed Mark Lerner.

Re: Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2011, 08:29:05 am »
The Nats need to get Wee Man to throw out the first pitch.


Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45515
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2011, 10:56:13 am »
I remember Nelson DLR and Pedro.  He fit in well with the '04 crew.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Human Mascots, Superstitious History
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2011, 11:43:22 am »
They missed Mark Lerner.

:lmao:  

You know, we can take this PC and "offensive" crap and throw it right out the window. This stuff isn't politically incorrect, it is brilliant American capitalism at its best.........
I look at this period and niche in baseball and I don't see offensive material. I see some remarkable people.

:clap:  

Of course SOME here will find offense in this.    :?