Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dukes Back; Wells to DL  (Read 1224 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NFA Brian

  • Posts: 1188
    • Nationals Farm Authority
Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Topic Start: June 02, 2009, 03:00:31 PM »
The Washington Nationals today recalled from rehab and reinstated outfielder Elijah Dukes from the 15-Day Disabled List and placed right-handed pitcher Kip Wells on the 15-Day DL, retroactive to May 31, with a right adductor strain.
Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #1: June 02, 2009, 03:04:17 PM »
What's an adductor?  Is that similar to an abduction?  Like, the aliens came and abducted my pitching ability?
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #2: June 02, 2009, 03:04:55 PM »
Quote from: DPMOmaha on June 02, 2009, 03:04:17 PM
What's an adductor?  Is that similar to an abduction?  Like, the aliens came and abducted my pitching ability?

Um, that would require him to have some ability in the 1st place...
Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #3: June 02, 2009, 03:05:36 PM »
He has some ability.  He can throw it really hard after all and he's been in the bigs for a while. 
Logged

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #4: June 02, 2009, 03:08:07 PM »
Quote from: DPMOmaha on June 02, 2009, 03:04:17 PM
What's an adductor?  Is that similar to an abduction?  Like, the aliens came and abducted my pitching ability?

Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #5: June 02, 2009, 03:10:15 PM »
I see.  If they'd said groin in there somewhere that would have been a whole lot easier.  Thanks for the graphics.
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #6: June 02, 2009, 03:10:48 PM »
I'm going to the game tonight -- so I am glad to hear Dukes is back...
Logged

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 41329
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #7: June 02, 2009, 04:07:19 PM »
In honor of Kip Wells, I will refer to "strikeout per inning pitched"  as "KIP."  A KIP of >1 is very good.  Kip doesn't do well on KIP.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #8: June 02, 2009, 05:02:30 PM »
Why did they even put him on the DL? what a waste. :?

He's not hurt. Just release his ass.
Logged

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 11688
  • Sunshine Squad 2024
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #9: June 02, 2009, 06:00:39 PM »
Even if Dukes contributes nothing, this move is straight addition by subtraction.
Logged

Offline NoShoesNoShirtNoDice

  • Posts: 1219
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #10: June 02, 2009, 06:04:26 PM »
Quote from: DPMOmaha on June 02, 2009, 03:10:15 PM
I see.  If they'd said groin in there somewhere that would have been a whole lot easier.  Thanks for the graphics.

But if they said groin, people might think he hurt his junk.
Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #11: June 02, 2009, 06:05:47 PM »
Maybe, I hope most people know the difference between groin and testicles though. 

I'm now done talking about Kip Wells' groinal region for the day.  thanks
Logged

Offline NoShoesNoShirtNoDice

  • Posts: 1219
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #12: June 02, 2009, 06:08:46 PM »
Quote from: DPMOmaha on June 02, 2009, 06:05:47 PM
Maybe, I hope most people know the difference between groin and testicles though. 

Most people do, but "groin injury" is sometimes a polite way of saying "junk injury".

Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31805
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #13: June 02, 2009, 06:15:59 PM »
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #14: June 02, 2009, 09:18:03 PM »
wait a sec, i thought groin injury was a polite injury for... yeah :D
Logged

big dizzy

  • Guest
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #15: June 03, 2009, 08:08:20 AM »
they could have said groin for junk but kip wells has no testicles so they couldn't say groin injury
Logged

Offline 2IPAs

  • Posts: 922
  • Barbie luvs the Nationals!
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #16: June 03, 2009, 08:15:17 AM »
Dukes was looking good last night. Very glad to have him back in the lineup.
Logged

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #17: June 03, 2009, 02:06:23 PM »
Quote from: 2IPAs on June 03, 2009, 08:15:17 AM
Dukes was looking good last night. Very glad to have him back in the lineup.

I CONCUR. i really, really, really, really, really hope Dukes can stay healthy for the rest of the season- because the results will be ridiculous.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #18: June 03, 2009, 02:18:31 PM »
Quote from: Air Zimmerman on June 03, 2009, 02:06:23 PM
I CONCUR. i really, really, really, really, really hope Dukes can stay healthy for the rest of the season- because the results will be ridiculous.

You ain't lying. Your little brothers and sisters would wake up every morning to this type of mess.

Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Dukes Back; Wells to DL
« Reply #19: June 03, 2009, 03:37:37 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on June 03, 2009, 02:18:31 PM
You ain't lying. Your little brothers and sisters would wake up every morning to this type of mess.

(Image removed from quote.)

:rofl: :az:
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up