Firefox 4 Beta 4 is out today. It's very Chromish.
which speaks volumes about the quality of Chrome as a product.
"not really" to both, imo. I can see where the comparison would be made, but I think the idea that Mozilla is copying Chrome is inaccurate. I think it's more a case of simply there are only so many ways to deliver the kind of things that the modern browser market expects/demands, so there are going to be a lot of similarities.
I like Chrome as a secondary browser, but it's still too restrictive and minimalist for my taste. I'm sure I could find extensions to make it more like what I prefer, but what's then what's the point?
