It's a guess either way. I just don't see it as something that would have made a huge difference before or after Guzman was traded. Guzman shouldn't have started 16 games at short for us, though.
Agreed it's not a huge difference, but it is one that kept the better 2B on the bench for too long and slowed the overall development of the SS. That's enough reason to be against it. And, at the team's current level, 2-3 wins in the first half looks pretty big right now. 61-62 just looks a lot better than 59.
