Author Topic: Nationals @ Rays, Game 3 (Read 12977 times)

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #200:** June 14, 2009, 02:57:40 PM »

good hustle Nicky.

Yanks up 13-0 after 4 innings against the Mutts.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #201:** June 14, 2009, 02:58:26 PM »

good sacrifice RZ

spidernat · « **Reply #202:** June 14, 2009, 02:58:28 PM »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on June 14, 2009, 02:56:34 PM

that first pitch to RZ was not a strike.

the HP ump is on the Rays.

No pitch to Zimmerman is a strike unless he fouls it off or swings and misses.

EdStroud · « **Reply #203:** June 14, 2009, 02:58:38 PM »

Can someone explain to me the situation on Manny Acta heard he going to be fired in New York?
What in the Name of San Juan Hill is going on?

spidernat · « **Reply #204:** June 14, 2009, 02:59:01 PM »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on June 14, 2009, 02:57:40 PM

good hustle Nicky.

Yanks up 13-0 after 4 innings against the Mutts.

They're going to feast on us.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #205:** June 14, 2009, 02:59:24 PM »

Quote from: EdStroud on June 14, 2009, 02:58:38 PM

Can someone explain to me the situation on Manny Acta heard he going to be fired in New York?
What in the Name of San Juan Hill is going on?

The draft is over and Rizzo is manning up.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #206:** June 14, 2009, 03:00:50 PM »

FAILure by Dunn again with a runner on 3rd and less than two outs

Section214 · « **Reply #207:** June 14, 2009, 03:01:19 PM »

So sick of Adam

spidernat · « **Reply #208:** June 14, 2009, 03:01:52 PM »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on June 14, 2009, 03:00:50 PM

FAILure by Dunn again with a runner on 3rd and less than two outs

I wonder how his numbers look now after that failure compared to Zimmerman's numbers in the same situation.

EdStroud · « **Reply #209:** June 14, 2009, 03:02:16 PM »

If Rizzo is manning up why am I watching Kory Patterson? That was the best the Nats could call up?

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #210:** June 14, 2009, 03:03:16 PM »

terrible. we are up 2 but are losing.

Dunn incapable of scoring a runner on third and less than two outs. what is that 3 days in a row now?

PANatsFan · « **Reply #211:** June 14, 2009, 03:03:20 PM »

Quote from: EdStroud on June 14, 2009, 03:02:16 PM

If Rizzo is manning up why am I watching Kory Patterson? That was the best the Nats could call up?

For a few days, then he'll be DFA'd when Willingham gets back. Why disrupt anyone else?

spidernat · « **Reply #212:** June 14, 2009, 03:05:38 PM »

Detwiler looks like Mike O'Connor right now.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #213:** June 14, 2009, 03:06:44 PM »

big DP!!

Section214 · « **Reply #214:** June 14, 2009, 03:07:26 PM »

Great play! Come on guys keep this up

spidernat · « **Reply #215:** June 14, 2009, 03:08:24 PM »

What's the pitch count so far?

shoeshineboy · « **Reply #216:** June 14, 2009, 03:08:29 PM »

Quote from: spidernat on June 14, 2009, 03:01:52 PM

I wonder how his numbers look now after that failure compared to Zimmerman's numbers in the same situation.

2009 stats with men on: --3 lt 2 outs.

Dunn: 25PA, 15AB, 3HR, 16RBI, .333/.476/.933

RZ: 16PA, 8AB, 0HR, 9RBI, .125/.375/250

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #217:** June 14, 2009, 03:08:49 PM »

nice fastball. Good job Ross

hammondsnats · « **Reply #218:** June 14, 2009, 03:08:54 PM »

DET

c'mon let's get the kid his first MLB win.

EdStroud · « **Reply #219:** June 14, 2009, 03:09:01 PM »

Can understand your point but IMO Langerhans would have been a better pick then Patterson.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #220:** June 14, 2009, 03:09:36 PM »

Quote from: spidernat on June 14, 2009, 03:08:24 PM

What's the pitch count so far?

78 (39 strikes, 39 balls)

PatsNats28 · « **Reply #221:** June 14, 2009, 03:09:50 PM »

Quote from: spidernat on June 14, 2009, 03:08:24 PM

What's the pitch count so far?

78. 39 strikes

hammondsnats · « **Reply #222:** June 14, 2009, 03:09:59 PM »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on June 14, 2009, 03:03:16 PM

terrible. we are up 2 but are losing.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #223:** June 14, 2009, 03:10:25 PM »

Quote from: EdStroud on June 14, 2009, 03:09:01 PM

Can understand your point but IMO Langerhans would have been a better pick then Patterson.

yeah but it's not saying much. both are AAAA types.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #224:** June 14, 2009, 03:10:32 PM »

Quote from: EdStroud on June 14, 2009, 03:09:01 PM

Can understand your point but IMO Langerhans would have been a better pick then Patterson.

Langerhans is 2/2 with a HR today for Syracuse coincidentally.

Olsen pitched 3 innings for the Chiefs and was crappy: 3 IP 4 H 2 R 2 ER 2 BB 2 K 1 HR