Author Topic: Nationals vs Diamondbacks, Game 2 (Read 37482 times)

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #600:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:08 PM »

nice!!

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #601:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:16 PM »

Nevermind. Beltran is 3/3 with 7 RBI.

Double overruled into a HR.

KingHarper · « **Reply #602:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:27 PM »

wow lol

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #603:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:27 PM »

he wont

a successful jynx

tomterp · « **Reply #604:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:30 PM »

got lucky there

I'll see your lucky, and raise you one.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #605:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:31 PM »

LaRoche has to bunt here, has to, has to. No doubt about it

TylerDC · « **Reply #606:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:32 PM »

Strasburg isn't?

I was just speaking about tonight. But if they're both on the field.. yeah, both equally awesome imo.

Mathguy · « **Reply #607:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:58 PM »

Oh shut up FP - the 3rd baseman never would have gotten Werth, even if he was playing up

PC · « **Reply #608:** May 02, 2012, 09:37:58 PM »

LaRoche should be bunting.

MorseTheHorse · « **Reply #609:** May 02, 2012, 09:38:10 PM »

good job by the fans on getting Upton to drop that fly ball

Kevrock · « **Reply #610:** May 02, 2012, 09:38:13 PM »

LaRoche has to bunt here, has to, has to. No doubt about it

PC · « **Reply #611:** May 02, 2012, 09:38:17 PM »

OT - Why was Mark Rypien at the game yesterday???

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #612:** May 02, 2012, 09:38:37 PM »

LaRoche should be bunting.

Anything else is just stupid. Too much of a risk of a DP. Have to be able to advance the runners here.

Mathguy · « **Reply #613:** May 02, 2012, 09:38:54 PM »

Why not be here ?

OT - Why was Mark Rypien at the game yesterday???

RobDibblesGhost · « **Reply #614:** May 02, 2012, 09:39:03 PM »

A bunt here would make sense, but I'm not sure if we'll see it.

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #615:** May 02, 2012, 09:39:43 PM »

laroche doesn't bunt much so it probably wouldn't be a good one if he was even able to get it down

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #616:** May 02, 2012, 09:39:51 PM »

A bunt here would make sense, but I'm not sure if we'll see it.

We won't. This could be ugly

aussienatsfan · « **Reply #617:** May 02, 2012, 09:40:06 PM »

you don't bunt with your freaking cleanup hitter, surelyu you back him to drive the goddam thing

Kevrock · « **Reply #618:** May 02, 2012, 09:40:25 PM »

laroche doesn't bunt much so it probably wouldn't be a good one if he was even able to get it down

This.

PC · « **Reply #619:** May 02, 2012, 09:40:46 PM »

you don't bunt with your freaking cleanup hitter, surelyu you back him to drive the goddam thing

You shouldn't have to but this team does.

RobDibblesGhost · « **Reply #620:** May 02, 2012, 09:41:01 PM »

Haha...they're struggling to throw strikes. Our hitters better not go up hacking.

GburgNatsFan · « **Reply #621:** May 02, 2012, 09:41:04 PM »

plus he's got a great eye.

you don't bunt with your freaking cleanup hitter, surelyu you back him to drive the goddam thing

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #622:** May 02, 2012, 09:41:19 PM »

good god, our bench is so LH heavy. yuck

RobDibblesGhost · « **Reply #623:** May 02, 2012, 09:41:25 PM »

Flores on deck for the pitcher's spot.

EdStroud · « **Reply #624:** May 02, 2012, 09:41:36 PM »

bring it..bring it