Author Topic: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing  (Read 1679 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2934
  • Too Stressed to care.
Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Topic Start: October 06, 2014, 02:37:07 PM »
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-washington-nationals-vs-vic-carapazza/#comment-4758305

Mostly the article discusses the consistency/inconsstency of Carapozza's strike zone.

But what caught my eye was the side by side GIF comparison of Ramos and Posey on similar pitches:
- Posey is nice and quiet.
- Ramos is dropping his glove as the ball is released and brings it up to catch it, Ramos drops his knee and bounces his head.

Looking at Ramos drop his left knee on those pitches - Minty (can we tag WNFF users in our posts) - I've always thought as a catcher that dropping your knee tells the ump it was lower than you expected....



Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #1: October 06, 2014, 02:50:31 PM »
ugh

the fact that the placement of a catcher's knees is more important than freaking pitch location boils my blood.

Just get electronic balls and strikes already - enough of this crap -

But not to derail this thread and get on that road again ...  that doesn't change the fact that Posey and Ramos catch differently and that it's had an impact - so to that extent, carry on

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #2: October 06, 2014, 02:54:38 PM »
I love it when catchers are lauded for their ability to fool the umpire.

And I love it when the MLBN commentators criticized the Nats for their inability to handle bad calls, as opposed to actually criticizing the bad calls themselves.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7948
  • The one true ace
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #3: October 06, 2014, 03:06:56 PM »
all those borderline pitches during the panic walk were strikes before that ab and after that ab, just not during the ab.  freaking bullcrap

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #4: October 06, 2014, 03:09:07 PM »
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-washington-nationals-vs-vic-carapazza/#comment-4758305

Mostly the article discusses the consistency/inconsstency of Carapozza's strike zone.

But what caught my eye was the side by side GIF comparison of Ramos and Posey on similar pitches:
- Posey is nice and quiet.
- Ramos is dropping his glove as the ball is released and brings it up to catch it, Ramos drops his knee and bounces his head.

Looking at Ramos drop his left knee on those pitches - Minty (can we tag WNFF users in our posts) - I've always thought as a catcher that dropping your knee tells the ump it was lower than you expected....

I've also been told by numerous umpires at varying levels that it helps a lot if a catcher does NOT extend his hand towards the plate, instead receive the ball with elbow bent and closer to the catcher's body.  This allows the umpire to see more of the strikezone and doesn't make it look like the catcher is reaching for a pitch.  The tradeoff is a split second in attempting to throw out runners because you have more ground to cover when your arm is placed in that position.

And I agree 100% with the "quiet" nature of Posey vs. a catcher with more movement.  Umpires can get distracted by catchers flailing around.  As a receiver, I try to make sure that any movement my mitt makes is toward the strikezone - it makes it look like I wanted a pitch off the plate and the pitcher missed for a strike rather than the other way around. 

There's a great deal of "gamesmanship" between catchers and umpires than most folks realize.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #5: October 06, 2014, 04:19:51 PM »
I've also been told by numerous umpires at varying levels that it helps a lot if a catcher does NOT extend his hand towards the plate, instead receive the ball with elbow bent and closer to the catcher's body.  This allows the umpire to see more of the strikezone and doesn't make it look like the catcher is reaching for a pitch.  The tradeoff is a split second in attempting to throw out runners because you have more ground to cover when your arm is placed in that position.

And I agree 100% with the "quiet" nature of Posey vs. a catcher with more movement.  Umpires can get distracted by catchers flailing around.  As a receiver, I try to make sure that any movement my mitt makes is toward the strikezone - it makes it look like I wanted a pitch off the plate and the pitcher missed for a strike rather than the other way around. 

There's a great deal of "gamesmanship" between catchers and umpires than most folks realize.

I'm a fan of the Buffalo but does Lobaton make the difference in a game like that?

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #6: October 06, 2014, 04:29:23 PM »
I'm a fan of the Buffalo but does Lobaton make the difference in a game like that?

If you believe that the pitches in the AB in question are close enough to be called either way, it can make a difference.

I can only affirm that I BELIEVE it makes a difference but you really can't quantify it.  Commish linked a great, video-backed example of the difference between a receiver of Posey's talent and of Ramos's talent.  However, it's still a belief and the pitches IMO are still off the plate.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21643
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #7: October 06, 2014, 04:48:56 PM »
I love it when catchers are lauded for their ability to fool the umpire.

And I love it when the MLBN commentators criticized the Nats for their inability to handle bad calls, as opposed to actually criticizing the bad calls themselves.


how about having a pitcher capable of framing? Suzuki was a disaster in 2012 and Ramos isn't much better

Offline Kurt Studzuki

  • Posts: 95
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #8: October 06, 2014, 04:53:49 PM »
how about having a pitcher capable of framing? Suzuki was a disaster in 2012 and Ramos isn't much better

 :crazy:

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40101
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #9: October 06, 2014, 09:15:25 PM »
Lobaton is supposed to be a good framer. Suzuki and Ramos are horrible. Lobaton learned for Jose Molina, who is supposed to be consistently one of the best.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63396
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #10: October 06, 2014, 09:32:58 PM »
I've said for a while that Ramos is pretty mediocre behind the plate.  Defensively, Lobaton is superior.

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4996
Re: Posey, Ramos, Fangraphs and pitch framing
« Reply #11: October 06, 2014, 09:38:16 PM »
Lobaton is supposed to be a good framer. Suzuki and Ramos are horrible. Lobaton learned for Jose Molina, who is supposed to be consistently one of the best.

When I looked up the stats late in the season Ramos was slightly negative and Lobaton slightly positive on framing. Buster Posey is one of the tops in baseball I believe.