Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2  (Read 20068 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #250: September 17, 2016, 04:24:40 PM »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

That wasn't aimed at your post. It was aimed at the moron who is doing the game and said that it wasn't like Rendon was trying to tag the runner but that the runner basically fell onto the tag. That doesn't matter. he was still out.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #251: September 17, 2016, 04:34:16 PM »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63516
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #252: September 17, 2016, 04:35:45 PM »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

FP?

Online imref

  • Posts: 43468
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #253: September 17, 2016, 11:20:39 PM »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #254: September 17, 2016, 11:43:52 PM »
Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Read my response you freaking moron. My post had nothing to do with what Slate posted. I was talking about what the commentator was saying.