Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20   Go Down

Author Topic: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2  (Read 15066 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #75: July 23, 2011, 10:38:05 PM »
Every ticket should be $2, Bob.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #76: July 23, 2011, 10:39:29 PM »
That was a terrible at-bat.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #77: July 23, 2011, 10:40:16 PM »
Quote from: thepointe01 on July 23, 2011, 10:37:46 PM
Agreed, if the front office is serious about defense, Morse isn't near as good at LF.  At 1B, he's above average, in LF, not so much.

He'll be in Lf next season.
Logged

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #78: July 23, 2011, 10:41:44 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:40:16 PM
He'll be in Lf next season.

I'd only be okay with this if the guy at 1st was named Prince.
Logged

Offline thepointe01

  • Posts: 4172
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #79: July 23, 2011, 10:41:50 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:40:16 PM
He'll be in Lf next season.

I don't know how I feel about that situation.  I'd love Fielder, but that would make us worse defensively at 2 positions.
Logged

Offline epic_phalanx

  • Posts: 498
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #80: July 23, 2011, 10:44:12 PM »
Quote from: thepointe01 on July 23, 2011, 10:41:50 PM
I don't know how I feel about that situation.  I'd love Fielder, but that would make us worse defensively at 2 positions.

That move would also make us better offensively at two positions. It'd probably be worth it.
Logged

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #81: July 23, 2011, 10:45:19 PM »
Quote from: epic_phalanx on July 23, 2011, 10:44:12 PM
That move would also make us better offensively at two positions. It'd probably be worth it.
I'm not an expert here, but according to UZR/150, Prince isn't much worse than Morse at 1st, defensively.
Logged

Offline thepointe01

  • Posts: 4172
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #82: July 23, 2011, 10:46:11 PM »
Quote from: epic_phalanx on July 23, 2011, 10:44:12 PM
That move would also make us better offensively at two positions. It'd probably be worth it.

Agreed on that point
Logged

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #83: July 23, 2011, 10:46:50 PM »
Quote from: TylerDC on July 23, 2011, 10:45:19 PM
I'm not an expert here, but according to UZR/150, Prince isn't much worse than Morse at 1st, defensively.

UZR (range) for a first baseman, while not worthless, is not nearly as important as it is at most other positions. Range is part of a 1B's job, but he's got other stuff to account for as well.
Logged

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #84: July 23, 2011, 10:47:29 PM »
Logged

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #85: July 23, 2011, 10:48:43 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:34:46 PM
But in the first inning he also said on Morse's double that the ball carries pretty decent in Dodger stadium at night. But last night he said the opposite when Bernadina and Espinosa missed HR's in the first inning.



Yup, I noticed that too.

FP's mouth moves.    And then he thinks (sort of) afterward.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #86: July 23, 2011, 10:49:59 PM »
Gorzelanny gives up hit to weak LH hitter and now a wild pitch.

He's no good
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #87: July 23, 2011, 10:50:09 PM »
Quote from: TylerDC on July 23, 2011, 10:41:44 PM
I'd only be okay with this if the guy at 1st was named Prince.

Quote from: thepointe01 on July 23, 2011, 10:41:50 PM
I don't know how I feel about that situation.  I'd love Fielder, but that would make us worse defensively at 2 positions.

Forget about Fielder. They will have Laroche back at 1B and move Morse to LF because Laroche is signed through 2012. By 2013, Morse will be back at 1B and Harper will be in LF.
Logged

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #88: July 23, 2011, 10:50:21 PM »
These three runs feel like nothing thanks to Gorz.
Logged

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #89: July 23, 2011, 10:51:28 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:50:09 PM
Forget about Fielder. They will have Laroche back at 1B and move Morse to LF because Laroche is signed through 2012. By 2013, Morse will be back at 1B and Harper will be in LF.

Can't I dream?
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #90: July 23, 2011, 10:51:33 PM »
This is the place where the #8 and/or #9 batter gets a hit.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #91: July 23, 2011, 10:52:21 PM »
Quote from: PC on July 23, 2011, 10:51:33 PM
This is the place where the #8 and/or #9 batter gets a hit.

Bingo.   :roll:
Logged

Offline thepointe01

  • Posts: 4172
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #92: July 23, 2011, 10:52:36 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:50:09 PM
Forget about Fielder. They will have Laroche back at 1B and move Morse to LF because Laroche is signed through 2012. By 2013, Morse will be back at 1B and Harper will be in LF.

I knew that, but I am wishing that that situation works itself out, somehow, some way.
Logged

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4041
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #93: July 23, 2011, 10:52:47 PM »
Gorzo is going to give this lead up.   Guaranteed.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #94: July 23, 2011, 10:53:04 PM »
Quote from: TylerDC on July 23, 2011, 10:51:28 PM
Can't I dream?

Oh my bad. Dream away.

but the cheap Lerners will not make it happen
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #95: July 23, 2011, 10:53:26 PM »
What the hell is wrong with Gorzelanny???  He's terrible tonight.
Logged

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #96: July 23, 2011, 10:54:15 PM »
Quote from: spidernat on July 23, 2011, 10:53:04 PM
Oh my bad. Dream away.

but the cheap Lerners will not make it happen

I realized like two minutes ago who I was actually talking to, prepared for the LAC plug there. :lol:
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #97: July 23, 2011, 10:54:39 PM »
Quote from: PC on July 23, 2011, 10:53:26 PM
What the hell is wrong with Gorzelanny???  He's terrible tonight.
He's always terrible, especially lately.
Logged

Offline Dixon Ward

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #98: July 23, 2011, 10:54:46 PM »
freakin' a.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals at Dodgers, Game 2
« Reply #99: July 23, 2011, 10:54:46 PM »
Damn.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 20   Go Up