Right, that was my next question, isn't there some big brouhaha about not paying the additional $2 per subscriber anymore?
Not sure, I doubt it though. It's entirely possible the agreements were written so that, as others have pointed out, MASN was on the hook regardless of subscribers. What might be important for Angelos's argument will be the Nielsen numbers (non-existent) and any future regulation regarding cable channel bundling that might be on the horizon (i.e. the dawn of a la carte cable programming).
