Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2016)  (Read 47948 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21652
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #775: November 23, 2016, 04:23:12 PM »
There are examples in both directions- ask ravens fans about paying not quite hof qbs. It's still something you have to do- the alternative is starting from scratch, and a lot of fans aren't ready to wait a decade before the next decent an shows up

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #776: November 24, 2016, 04:48:11 PM »
GAME

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #777: November 24, 2016, 05:10:59 PM »
Franchise QB my ass

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #778: November 24, 2016, 05:11:14 PM »
Down goes Reed.   :smh:

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #779: November 24, 2016, 05:15:52 PM »
Franchise QB my ass
Did you see anyone open in the end zone?

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #780: November 24, 2016, 05:16:13 PM »
Down goes Reed.   :smh:
I was just thinking that. He just can't stay healthy.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #781: November 24, 2016, 05:18:13 PM »
I was just thinking that. He just can't stay healthy.

He took a pretty solid hit.    I missed it 'til the replay.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #782: November 24, 2016, 05:20:23 PM »
70 million ....can't cover the slot

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #783: November 24, 2016, 05:20:35 PM »
Did you see anyone open in the end zone?
Yes. Two Redskins tipped it

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #784: November 24, 2016, 05:23:13 PM »
Joe Buck having multiple orgasms over the Cowgirls.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #785: November 24, 2016, 05:23:40 PM »
Why is Fuller on Beasley?


Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #786: November 24, 2016, 05:24:02 PM »
Where the freak is Dunbar or Blackmon?

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #787: November 24, 2016, 05:24:13 PM »
Yes. Two Redskins tipped it
Didn't look open to me. Also not his fault they ran one of those ridiculous wildcat plays on first and goal.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #788: November 24, 2016, 05:24:55 PM »
Joe Buck having multiple orgasms over the Cowgirls.

:spit:    I was mentioning my distaste for Buck to the missus.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #789: November 24, 2016, 05:32:13 PM »
:spit:    I was mentioning my distaste for Buck to the missus.
Just not the same level of reaction when the other team has the ball. He is more blatant of a Dallas fan than Aikman is.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #790: November 24, 2016, 05:34:25 PM »
Just not the same level of reaction when the other team has the ball. He is more blatant of a Dallas fan than Aikman is.

In every game he does, he has a favorite.    It's discernable.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #791: November 24, 2016, 05:37:17 PM »
Just not the same level of reaction when the other team has the ball. He is more blatant of a Dallas fan than Aikman is.

I once watched a replay of a game where someone muted Buck but left Aikman. I was surprised by how good of an analyst Aikman really is

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #792: November 24, 2016, 05:39:34 PM »
Why would they build a stadium where the sun comes in like that?

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #793: November 24, 2016, 05:40:52 PM »
I once watched a replay of a game where someone muted Buck but left Aikman. I was surprised by how good of an analyst Aikman really is
I will just have to play it safe and mute them both.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #794: November 24, 2016, 05:44:20 PM »
Dallas is simply dominating. They will rout them in the 2nd half. Skins are simply to tired and beaten up

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #795: November 24, 2016, 05:48:05 PM »
Why would they build a stadium where the sun comes in like that?

Dallas is famous for that kind of thing.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26258
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #796: November 24, 2016, 05:50:16 PM »
Dallas is famous for that kind of thing.
I flipped over to basketball. Can't take it. Someone must stop Dallas!

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #797: November 24, 2016, 05:51:37 PM »
I flipped over to basketball. Can't take it. Someone must stop Dallas!

Who ya watchin'?     I've been surfin' hoops myself.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #798: November 24, 2016, 05:53:09 PM »
Looked helmet to helmet

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63645
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #799: November 24, 2016, 06:48:01 PM »
The running game sucks