Poll

Is Mitchell Parker the real deal?  (Optional: Add comments re: his floor/ceiling)

Yes
3 (18.8%)
No
1 (6.3%)
Maybe
3 (18.8%)
Ask me in 2 months
9 (56.3%)

Total Members Voted: 16

Voting closes: May 05, 2024, 11:41:50 PM

Author Topic: Mitchell Parker  (Read 298 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GNatsNoMore

  • Posts: 1176
Mitchell Parker
« Topic Start: April 21, 2024, 11:41:50 PM »
After dominating the Dodgers and the Astros in his first two major league starts, is Mitchell Parker actually a good major league starter?  I say maybe (but I'm leaning yes after seeing his highlights from today's start).


Bonus points for adding comments re: his floor/ceiling that prove accurate before the end of the season. 

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29631
  • King of Goodness
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #1: April 22, 2024, 12:54:58 AM »
Encouraging, but WAY too early to tell...

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 5684
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #2: April 22, 2024, 01:40:00 AM »
Not sure his fastball continues to play as it is only average. Control is outstanding along with poise. Voted to ask me in 2 months.

Online zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 7953
  • The one true ace
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #3: April 22, 2024, 02:00:52 AM »
He walked 61 in 124 innings last year in AA/AAA (95% being AA).  That being said, he looks really freaking good so far.

Worst case is he’s a modern loogy.  Mid case #4/5 starter.  Best case legit 3 starter

Offline GataNats

  • Posts: 1431
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #4: April 22, 2024, 03:09:41 AM »
That curveball is one of the top 15 in baseball.  His fastball plays with the late rise like Doolitle

Offline IanRubbish

  • Posts: 787
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #5: April 22, 2024, 06:30:36 AM »
Some guys just have confidence, he reminds me of Brock Purdy in that way.  He could have had a 0.75 ERA in AAA and been a nervous wreck to face that Dodger lineup in LA for his first ever MLB start.

Yeah, as he pitches more there'll be better advance scouting against him, and he will have some bad starts, but that confidence will be tough to shake.  Also, he's a Nat.  We haven't had a pitching performance from a young starter like that in years.  Compared to our other starters:

-Josiah Gray last year went 7 innings four times, but gave up walks or HRs in each of those starts
-Parker's had 2 starts with 0 walks now,  Gray had 2 all last season, and in each of those games he gave up 2 HRs
-MacKenzie Gore had 2 starts with 0 walks last year, 1 was a start where was pulled in the 2nd due to injury, the other he went 6 and gave up a HR
-Jake Irvin has had 1 start his entire career with 0 walks, but he gave up 2 HRs in that effort

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43320
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #6: April 22, 2024, 09:24:36 AM »
He reminds me of J-Zimm in his demeanor.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26104
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #7: April 22, 2024, 09:27:40 AM »
He reminds me of J-Zimm in his demeanor.
That’s a good thing.  I miss J Zimm.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 63445
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #8: April 22, 2024, 10:07:59 AM »
Its a good start. Will be interesting to see what happens when other teams get scouting on him.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40246
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #9: April 23, 2024, 08:34:30 AM »
it's funny, but if you go to Fangraphs home page and hover of the search for players box, the 4th name on the drop down is Parker, behind Lee, Ohtani, and Kjerstad. The combo of "who is this guy?" and who is hot lately.

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 2858
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #10: April 23, 2024, 09:20:12 AM »
it's funny, but if you go to Fangraphs home page and hover of the search for players box, the 4th name on the drop down is Parker, behind Lee, Ohtani, and Kjerstad. The combo of "who is this guy?" and who is hot lately.

He was the number one player in the search box for a little bit there.

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 2858
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #11: April 23, 2024, 03:58:20 PM »
Also kinda crazy how Rutledge probably gets the call up instead of Parker if he doesn't take a comebacker off his ankle.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 26104
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #12: Yesterday at 03:25:23 PM »
Getting roughed up a little today but maybe he can become the Nats Ranger Suarez. I don’t think he was ever in the Phillies top prospects.  Came out of nowhere.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 40246
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #13: Yesterday at 04:36:21 PM »
5.1, 6 hits, 5 Ks, 2 BBs, almost all that damage in the 2nd inning (walk, single, then 3 singles after 2 out). I'll take that most of the time. Nice way JBArnes picked him up.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 43320
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Mitchell Parker
« Reply #14: Yesterday at 09:50:22 PM »
Developing Mitchell Parker:

https://wapo.st/3y20ory