Author Topic: Montz+LeFave  (Read 8536 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86077
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #25: August 10, 2008, 07:10:06 PM »
Why did he say Nene Marrero?

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27943
  • Hell yes!
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #26: August 10, 2008, 07:11:15 PM »
Why did he say Nene Marrero?

Probably a nickname.  I think it means "little", or "baby".

AndrewS102, it's not a requirement, but you are certainly invited to introduce yourself in the new members / intro thread.   :P

Offline AndrewS102

  • Posts: 53
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #27: August 10, 2008, 07:12:48 PM »
Probably a nickname.  I think it means "little", or "baby".
Correct, a nickname.  When there are two Chris' in the family (Christian and Christopher) one of them has to go by something else, right?

Offline agent39

  • Posts: 30
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #28: August 10, 2008, 07:55:55 PM »
Blog updated. Thanks for paying attention. And again, he is very excited to be a National!

Offline AndrewS102

  • Posts: 53
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #29: August 10, 2008, 08:06:55 PM »
Blog updated. Thanks for paying attention. And again, he is very excited to be a National!
the excitement is mutual.

Andrew Stebbins

Offline cletusvandamme

  • Posts: 162
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #30: August 10, 2008, 08:28:42 PM »
Nary a mention of our friend JimBo in the blog post, but kudos to Rizzo for getting it done.  Hmmmmmm.  Could this be foreshadowing a changing of the guard?

edit: just saw info in the other post...carry on.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #31: August 10, 2008, 08:29:56 PM »
Nary a mention of our friend JimBo in the blog post, but kudos to Rizzo for getting it done.  Hmmmmmm.  Could this be foreshadowing a changing of the guard?

dunno. i think that warrants discussion in another thread though.

Offline cletusvandamme

  • Posts: 162
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #32: August 10, 2008, 08:32:05 PM »
dunno. i think that warrants discussion in another thread though.

Never mind.  Just read the wealth of info in the other post on Nieto.

Offline agent39

  • Posts: 30
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #33: August 12, 2008, 08:06:58 PM »
Updated my blog on the 1st day of Adrian's career.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #34: August 13, 2008, 06:17:17 PM »
Updated my blog on the 1st day of Adrian's career.

Which 3 trading card companies did he get deals for?

Offline agent39

  • Posts: 30
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #35: September 02, 2008, 08:16:27 PM »
Luke was called up today.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #36: September 02, 2008, 08:19:05 PM »
Luke was called up today.

just now? (after flores left the game)

or earlier in the day?

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86077
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #37: September 02, 2008, 08:25:34 PM »
Must have been just now since he posted right after Flores got hurt.

Offline agent39

  • Posts: 30
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #38: September 02, 2008, 08:27:40 PM »
Just now.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16320
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #39: September 02, 2008, 08:34:05 PM »
Just now.

Bowden's a retard. Montz should have been called up on the first.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #40: September 02, 2008, 09:04:18 PM »
Luke was called up today.

I was hoping we would get a look at Montz this September; unfortunately it comes at Flores' expense.

Offline AndrewS102

  • Posts: 53
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #41: September 02, 2008, 09:14:11 PM »
I was hoping we would get a look at Montz this September; unfortunately it comes at Flores' expense.
Yeah agreed.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37017
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #42: September 02, 2008, 10:08:43 PM »
Bowden's a retard. Montz should have been called up on the first.

Arbitration, service time - you know the drill.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16320
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #43: September 02, 2008, 10:41:37 PM »
Arbitration, service time - you know the drill.

Yeah but Montz has to be put on the 40 man next season or clear the rule V draft. Only having two catchers in September is unnecessary.

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27943
  • Hell yes!
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #44: September 03, 2008, 08:46:02 AM »
Well, nobody wanted Flores to get hurt, but we all wanted a look at Montz.

Agent39, will this be your first player to take the field in Washington? 


Offline agent39

  • Posts: 30
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #45: September 03, 2008, 02:18:04 PM »
Yes it is. I should be there next week. Cant wait.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15535
  • Future
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #46: September 04, 2008, 01:28:12 AM »
Starting tomorrow, looking forward to what Martis and him do.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37017
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #47: September 04, 2008, 09:04:03 AM »
Starting tomorrow, looking forward to what Martis and him do.

That is a hell of an idea. Too bad TBS no longer shows Braves games :(

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37017
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #48: September 04, 2008, 09:51:50 PM »
agent39, Montz is listed at nats.com as a 1B as well (not trying to open that can of worms again :lol:). That makes him valuable in Nats land, no?

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27943
  • Hell yes!
Re: Montz+LeFave
« Reply #49: September 04, 2008, 10:21:02 PM »
agent39, Montz is listed at nats.com as a 1B as well (not trying to open that can of worms again :lol:). That makes him valuable in Nats land, no?

Interesting.  From the player perspective, Montz is worth a lot more as a catcher, since a good hitting catcher is an average hitting 1B at best.  Catcher's obviously a much more demanding position defensively, and Montz seems to be a very good defensive catcher.  I don't see 1b at all.