Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 9616 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48489
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #175: May 13, 2008, 08:44:33 PM »
What's Maine's pitch count right now? nevermind it's 90. How pathetic are we that we're worried about the opponent's pitch count :?

Online houston-nat

  • Posts: 14923
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #176: May 13, 2008, 08:44:45 PM »
Screw off. They are better than us at every damn position. And we hardly beat them.
Nah - we have a better first baseman, a better second baseman (today) and the advantage in at least one of three outfielders, plus a catcher who's at least equal to theirs.

Online houston-nat

  • Posts: 14923
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #177: May 13, 2008, 08:45:01 PM »
What's Maine's pitch count right now?
88

Offline Jayman77

  • Posts: 243
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #178: May 13, 2008, 08:45:12 PM »
Nats have to get to the Mutts' bullpen to pull this out, I think.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 77900
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #179: May 13, 2008, 08:45:17 PM »
What's Maine's pitch count right now?
90 after that foul by NJ

Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #180: May 13, 2008, 08:45:34 PM »
How much have they outscored us sure we will win and even by 6 runs but we will lose a lot more.

Can someone please translate this worthless babble?

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #181: May 13, 2008, 08:46:18 PM »
Zim shouldn't be a 3rd hitter, he belongs in the 4 spot but as of know no one can better suit that role.

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7023
  • Special Event Co-Chair w/ Erica!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #182: May 13, 2008, 08:46:28 PM »
Can someone please translate this worthless babble?

That one is confusing!

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #183: May 13, 2008, 08:47:33 PM »
Can someone please translate this worthless babble?
We will beat them sometimes. But we will lose more than we win every year. We are not in a state to say other well built teams with decent farm systems suck.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48489
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #184: May 13, 2008, 08:48:01 PM »
Time for some Milledge yard work.

Offline Jayman77

  • Posts: 243
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #185: May 13, 2008, 08:48:04 PM »
Zim shouldn't be a 3rd hitter, he belongs in the 4 spot but as of know no one can better suit that role.
As of "know"?  You're a dumbass.  Leave.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48489
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #186: May 13, 2008, 08:48:41 PM »
Natsman had some decent posts earlier today but he seems to lose focus in game threads :?

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13843
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #187: May 13, 2008, 08:49:17 PM »
We will beat them sometimes. But we will lose more than we win every year. We are not in a state to say other well built teams with decent farm systems suck.
The Nats already beat them in the season series last year.

*insert "dear god make it stop" jpeg here*

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 77900
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #188: May 13, 2008, 08:49:26 PM »
Dmitri has a single and 2 walks in 4 plate appearances so far tonight in Harrisburg. He had 1 catching error playing 1B.

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7023
  • Special Event Co-Chair w/ Erica!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #189: May 13, 2008, 08:49:35 PM »
ok guys let's play nice and just focus on the game.  Keep it up and you'll be relegated to the cool down zone.  :)

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #190: May 13, 2008, 08:49:55 PM »
Natsman had some decent posts earlier today but he seems to lose focus in game threads :?
I seem to always do I just try to write something...anything I will get back on track.

Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #191: May 13, 2008, 08:50:12 PM »
We will beat them sometimes. But we will lose more than we win every year. We are not in a state to say other well built teams with decent farm systems suck.


SPEAKETH THE ENGLISH???!!!

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #192: May 13, 2008, 08:50:16 PM »
regardless of outcome, this is a good AB from Milledge, imo.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 77900
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #193: May 13, 2008, 08:50:55 PM »
LMAO at Easley.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48489
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #194: May 13, 2008, 08:51:03 PM »
Easley is garbage.

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #195: May 13, 2008, 08:51:33 PM »

SPEAKETH THE ENGLISH???!!!

Yes I am, all I am saying is the Mets>Nationals no one can deny that.

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #196: May 13, 2008, 08:51:59 PM »
What the hell kind of swing was that....keep your head in.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13843
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #197: May 13, 2008, 08:52:29 PM »
I'm really starting to think that Natsman is mentally handicapped.  We should lay off.

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #198: May 13, 2008, 08:53:12 PM »
I'm really starting to think that Natsman is mentally handicapped.  We should lay off.
Look what the hell did I do wrong I am saying Kearns had a bad swing.

Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #199: May 13, 2008, 08:53:43 PM »
Yes I am, all I am saying is the Mets>Nationals no one can deny that.

Then what are you doing here? You try to start a Cubs Fan Thread, you are sucking up to the Mutts, and you have little knowledge on the Washington Nationals.

Shouldn't you be elsewhere?