Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 13655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 88959
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #650: May 12, 2008, 10:14:14 PM »
That looked like a strike. Dukes looks PISSED.  :P

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #651: May 12, 2008, 10:14:18 PM »
Sounds like Dukes was nagging about that called strike that looked like a good call.

AZ climaxes just the same...

Online houston-nat

  • Posts: 17053
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #652: May 12, 2008, 10:14:20 PM »
This is now the second longest GDT of the season. 50 or so more posts and it will be #1.
Let's go for it!

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18711
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #653: May 12, 2008, 10:14:31 PM »
Mets players in dugout: "If Dukes is at the plate batting, then he can't be screwing our sistas."

Strikes out... something he's NOT used to doing... with sistas!


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 13180
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #654: May 12, 2008, 10:14:39 PM »
Blue balled.
Will AZ achieve his long awaited climax tonight?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #655: May 12, 2008, 10:15:51 PM »
Blue balled.

Nah, just the sight of him inspires wood...

Hey JMad is that quote in your sig for real or just a joke?

Offline bangzoom05

  • Posts: 122
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #656: May 12, 2008, 10:16:19 PM »
nats2playoffs  what do you do for a living?

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #657: May 12, 2008, 10:16:24 PM »
Dukes is just as bad as WMP.  I did not know that was possible. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #658: May 12, 2008, 10:16:38 PM »
Guzman not to be outdone... :lol:

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #659: May 12, 2008, 10:16:44 PM »
At least Wagner gave up a hit

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 88959
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #660: May 12, 2008, 10:16:48 PM »
Nah, just the sight of him inspires wood...

Hey JMad is that quote in your sig for real or just a joke?
That's for real. I read it yesterday.

Double for CG.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 43274
  • And then there were six...
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #661: May 12, 2008, 10:16:56 PM »
Guzman finally gets a hit and goes 1-6 for the night.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #662: May 12, 2008, 10:17:05 PM »
Wagner is whispering sweet nothings to Schneider

Online houston-nat

  • Posts: 17053
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #663: May 12, 2008, 10:17:14 PM »
Dukes is just as bad as WMP.  I did not know that was possible. 
Wily Mo is doing much better, actually, so far, although to be fair he has had more playing time...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #664: May 12, 2008, 10:17:18 PM »
Dukes is just as bad as WMP.  I did not know that was possible. 

Yesterday Dukes was hitting the ball hard though.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #665: May 12, 2008, 10:18:22 PM »
That's for real. I read it yesterday.

Double for CG.

So Ayala pulled a Sammy Sosa. What a piece of crap. That's weak and it pisses me off.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 88959
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #666: May 12, 2008, 10:18:44 PM »
omg, what a late strike call. 

Offline PC

  • Posts: 43274
  • And then there were six...
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #667: May 12, 2008, 10:19:27 PM »
omg, what a late strike call. 

I was sure it was a ball 'til I heard strike! :shock:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 88959
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #668: May 12, 2008, 10:19:29 PM »
The last 7 outs by Nationals have been strikeouts.  :rofl:

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 13180
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #669: May 12, 2008, 10:19:46 PM »
Zimm's gotta pull the trigger with two strikes.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23242
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #670: May 12, 2008, 10:19:50 PM »
I can almost guarantee that Dukes' first hit will be a homer. His average will be about .054 after that, though.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #671: May 12, 2008, 10:19:59 PM »
Dukes is just as bad as WMP.  I did not know that was possible. 

but at least Dukes isn't mexican, right?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #672: May 12, 2008, 10:20:03 PM »
Reverting back to Nats baseball, what was that 6 K's in a row?

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #673: May 12, 2008, 10:20:43 PM »
KEITH HERNANDEZ IS AN IDIOT. he was dumbfounded that dukes thought that last pitch was high, WHEN HE REALLY WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT THE RIDICULOUS 10 FOOT STRIKE ZONE OF THE UMP. the first pitch of the at bat was too high, and that last one was low.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56206
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #674: May 12, 2008, 10:21:17 PM »
but at least Dukes isn't mexican, right?

LOL I had forgotten about eagleskins' rants on the ethnicity of our ball club.  :rofl: