Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 12661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85058
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #225: May 12, 2008, 08:12:48 PM »
Look up the definition of 'loser' and 'clown' in the dictionary and you'll find the word 'Nationals'. 

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23222
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #226: May 12, 2008, 08:13:20 PM »
Why is Manny moving guys around so much in the field?! That wasn't on Perez as much as it was on Manny there.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #227: May 12, 2008, 08:13:40 PM »
Does it seem like we are getting burned a lot lately with having AK toward center & guys putting them close to the line? 

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13904
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #228: May 12, 2008, 08:14:25 PM »
Why is Manny moving guys around so much in the field?! That wasn't on Perez as much as it was on Manny there.
and/or Pat Corrales

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #229: May 12, 2008, 08:14:39 PM »
Does it seem like we are getting burned a lot lately with having AK toward center & guys putting them close to the line? 

We have to do that with such a big liability in center.  Milledge can't cover any ground. 

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85058
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #230: May 12, 2008, 08:14:47 PM »
It's Perez' fault for not pitching to the way the defense is aligned. He can't pitch for crap.  WTF did he give Easley something to hit 0-1?

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #231: May 12, 2008, 08:14:48 PM »
There's the Schneider we know.


Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30003
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #232: May 12, 2008, 08:15:03 PM »
Does it seem like we are getting burned a lot lately with having AK toward center & guys putting them close to the line? 

Now that you mention it, it does kinda seem that way.

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #233: May 12, 2008, 08:15:46 PM »
Perez has been awful tonight. 

Online PC

  • Posts: 39868
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #234: May 12, 2008, 08:16:02 PM »
Now we have to score again.  For this offense to keep scoring, you're asking a lot!

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #235: May 12, 2008, 08:16:03 PM »
We have to do that with such a big liability in center.  Milledge can't cover any ground. 
I'm sure they're playing where the stats say they should, but it seems like I've noticed quite a few games recently where we had AK shaded way over & deep and the guy dumps a blooper down the rf line. 

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17697
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #236: May 12, 2008, 08:16:30 PM »
What's the big topic on tonights agenda?


Consideration of proposed zoning text amendments to City Code Chapter 110, specifically Article I, Section 110-4; Article II, Sections 110-155 and 110-156; Article IX, Section 110-631, 110-632 and 110-635; Article XI, Section 110-701, 110-702 and 110-705; and Article XIV, Sections 110-781 and 110-782; and creating a new Section 110-373 to revise the regulations with respect to hotels and motels and to provide for extended stay hotels.

You'll find that lots of businesses operating as extended stay hotels are blatantly violating land use laws, and could easily be fined millions of dollars.

Meanwhile... Easley singled to right, Alou scored.

Nationales 2
Mutts 3



Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53142
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #237: May 12, 2008, 08:16:33 PM »
We're on pace to lose this game 9-6  with the picket fence the Mets are erecting against Perez :?

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #238: May 12, 2008, 08:16:45 PM »
Now we have to score again.  For this offense to keep scoring, you're asking a lot!
Nelson Figeuroa vs. the Nationals Lineup:  The moveable object vs. the resistable force!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85058
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #239: May 12, 2008, 08:17:12 PM »
Perez has been awful tonight. 
We are finally seeing his true colors.  Did people really expect him to cut his ERA in half in one season?

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23222
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #240: May 12, 2008, 08:17:47 PM »
It's Perez' fault for not pitching to the way the defense is aligned. He can't pitch for crap.  WTF did he give Easley something to hit 0-1?

LOL. sportsfan's rule: Never throw a strike when you have an 0-1 count. :lol:

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13904
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #241: May 12, 2008, 08:17:48 PM »
Look at that cone of ignorance in the Nationals' dugout.  Belliard and WMP are sitting next to each other.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #242: May 12, 2008, 08:18:28 PM »
I was watching a bit of the Sox/Twins games.  Livan caught a liner right back at him to record the 3rd out & he emphatically spiked the ball on the ground.  That would piss me off if someone did that against us.

Offline kimnat

  • Posts: 7023
  • Special Event Co-Chair w/ Erica!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #243: May 12, 2008, 08:18:33 PM »
Consideration of proposed zoning text amendments to City Code Chapter 110, specifically Article I, Section 110-4; Article II, Sections 110-155 and 110-156; Article IX, Section 110-631, 110-632 and 110-635; Article XI, Section 110-701, 110-702 and 110-705; and Article XIV, Sections 110-781 and 110-782; and creating a new Section 110-373 to revise the regulations with respect to hotels and motels and to provide for extended stay hotels.

You'll find that lots of businesses operating as extended stay hotels are blatantly violating land use laws, and could easily be fined millions of dollars.

Meanwhile... Easley singled to right, Alou scored.

Nationales 2
Mutts 3


(Image removed from quote.)


:rofl:  And the big to do is how this will merge with the Fairfax Boulevard Master Plan draft.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #244: May 12, 2008, 08:19:03 PM »
Mack should win the LF job by default

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85058
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #245: May 12, 2008, 08:19:04 PM »
Good AB, Rob. Another lead-off runner.  We MUST score that run.

Offline eagleskins

  • BANNED FOREVER
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #246: May 12, 2008, 08:19:32 PM »
Great, great 8 pitch walk at bat for Mack. 

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23222
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #247: May 12, 2008, 08:19:39 PM »
I'm sure they're playing where the stats say they should, but it seems like I've noticed quite a few games recently where we had AK shaded way over & deep and the guy dumps a blooper down the rf line. 

It's the no doubles defense. Playing scared is what it really is.

Offline LetsGoNats

  • Posts: 1594
  • We're Nat Gonna Take It!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #248: May 12, 2008, 08:19:48 PM »
Figueroa will be back in the Chinese professional league soon

Online PC

  • Posts: 39868
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #249: May 12, 2008, 08:19:51 PM »
We must plate some runs!