Author Topic: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4  (Read 12590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daveb32

  • Posts: 1860
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #150: May 04, 2008, 02:44:39 PM »
Bergmann with another solid outing so far: 6IP 3H 0R 2BB 5Ks

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #151: May 04, 2008, 02:44:58 PM »
Who gives up a Homer to freaking LaRoche?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #152: May 04, 2008, 02:45:02 PM »
lmao.. Dukes got ejected in Columbus today
LOL, wtf happened?

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #153: May 04, 2008, 02:45:06 PM »
Complete game shutout would be nice. :D

I need to stop saying crap like this. :?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #154: May 04, 2008, 02:45:06 PM »
Complete game shutout would be nice. :D

Won't happen.  >:(

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #155: May 04, 2008, 02:45:11 PM »
Bergmann with another solid outing so far: 6IP 3H 0R 2BB 5Ks
Call him up and send down Chico

Offline daveb32

  • Posts: 1860
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #156: May 04, 2008, 02:45:46 PM »
Complete game shutout would be nice. :D
The first rule about complete game shutouts is you don't talk about complete game shutouts.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #157: May 04, 2008, 02:45:46 PM »
How did he use that in a sentence?

He was talking about how "solid" Snell is "through the middle" and then started listing off body segments from the shoulders down, ending at "butt muscles" (guess he's never heard the term "glutes" :lol: )

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9422
  • Through Fick and Zim
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #158: May 04, 2008, 02:45:48 PM »
Arghh.  LaRoche goes deep and gone.

His career has tanked since going to Pittsburgh.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #159: May 04, 2008, 02:45:57 PM »
LOL, wtf happened?
Arguing balls and strikes.  Not sure exactly of the details though.  The Clippers' manager got thrown out too.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #160: May 04, 2008, 02:46:04 PM »
I need to stop saying **** like this. :?
It was either you who jinxed him, or me saying Redding had only made one mistake.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #161: May 04, 2008, 02:46:26 PM »
Who gives up a Homer to ******* LaRoche?

He had 53 combined the past two seasons.

Offline daveb32

  • Posts: 1860
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #162: May 04, 2008, 02:47:16 PM »
It's the like the second time around facing the batters, Redding is a completely different pitcher.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #163: May 04, 2008, 02:47:26 PM »
He had 53 combined the past two seasons.
He's garbage. 

Redding is falling apart. 

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #164: May 04, 2008, 02:47:27 PM »
Arguing balls and strikes.  Not sure exactly of the details though.  The Clippers' manager got thrown out too.
Not too big of a deal then.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #165: May 04, 2008, 02:48:00 PM »
He's garbage. 

Redding is falling apart. 
Yeah, LaRoche really hasn't been the same player since the start of '07.  A lot of those homers were hit back in '06.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #166: May 04, 2008, 02:48:07 PM »
Quote
lmao.. Dukes got ejected in Columbus today

 :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

he needs to be called up not only because we need the offense, but he doesn't have any mentors in Columbus...he needs to be under the watchful eye of Manny and company.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #167: May 04, 2008, 02:48:50 PM »
LMAO at the Hawks down 36 in the third quarter to the Celtics.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19050
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #168: May 04, 2008, 02:48:52 PM »
Double play, please.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #169: May 04, 2008, 02:49:02 PM »
ah, the curse of the 5th inning for redding.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #170: May 04, 2008, 02:49:36 PM »
LMAO at the Hawks down 36 in the third quarter to the Celtics.

i remember someone comparing it to march madness. this is like a 16 seed playing a 1 seed.

Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #171: May 04, 2008, 02:50:50 PM »
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

he needs to be called up not only because we need the offense, but he doesn't have any mentors in Columbus...he needs to be under the watchful eye of Manny and company.

You think these players are such pansies.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #172: May 04, 2008, 02:51:02 PM »
OK, damage minimized. We need to get at least 2 more runs right here. 

Offline daveb32

  • Posts: 1860
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #173: May 04, 2008, 02:51:49 PM »
Bergmann pulled after only 82 pitches and 6 innings without giving up a run.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16259
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Nationals vs Pirates, Game 4
« Reply #174: May 04, 2008, 02:52:33 PM »
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

he needs to be called up not only because we need the offense, but he doesn't have any mentors in Columbus...he needs to be under the watchful eye of Manny and company.
Actually, you're not giving your little mancrush enough credit.  Apparently, the call was so bad that the Clippers' manager felt the need to argue it as well, so it seems like Dukes was somewhat justified in arguing it.  Of course, players shouldn't really get ejected, but if you're going to, it looks less absurd to have it be about something like this.