Author Topic: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2  (Read 11386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #300: April 19, 2008, 09:07:18 PM »
what is Hill's pitch count at?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #301: April 19, 2008, 09:08:08 PM »
Horrible route by AK. That cost us one base.  His defense is now becoming a liability. 

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #302: April 19, 2008, 09:08:12 PM »
For anyone who cares about hockey, the Bruins just scored to make it 2-2.  I want Boston to win that series just to see the Habs fans go apecrap.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #303: April 19, 2008, 09:08:58 PM »
freaking bull crap broken bat hit.. Thanks again RZ.  He cost us 2 freaking runs tonight.  :roll:

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #304: April 19, 2008, 09:09:08 PM »
Base hit past a diving Felipe to make it 3-2.  I'm sure a certain someone will say that fatass Belliard would've had that grounder.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #305: April 19, 2008, 09:10:41 PM »
Horrible route by AK. That cost us one base.  His defense is now becoming a liability. 

all of the Kearns Defenses are breaking down.

sad, cause I really did hope he would break out this year, and I half-way bought into the RFK Theory.

sadly, it just seems like Kearns is quite possibly a fraud.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #306: April 19, 2008, 09:10:49 PM »
Hill's really coming apart at the seams.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #307: April 19, 2008, 09:11:46 PM »
Wow, he's totally out of gas.  Let's hope our bullpen can come up big here.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12447
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #308: April 19, 2008, 09:11:49 PM »
Dunno who said it, but I heard someone say that the lighting in the outfield sucks.
all of the Kearns Defenses are breaking down.

sad, cause I really did hope he would break out this year, and I half-way bought into the RFK Theory.

sadly, it just seems like Kearns is quite possibly a fraud.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #309: April 19, 2008, 09:11:53 PM »
Ouch. :( G' night Shawn.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #310: April 19, 2008, 09:12:08 PM »
This is what happened with Hill in his last start in Columbus.  Now Colome is coming in.. Oh brother

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #311: April 19, 2008, 09:12:55 PM »
Dunno who said it, but I heard someone say that the lighting in the outfield sucks.
Yeah, I've heard that it's an absolutely impossible place to play outfield.  Still doesn't justify his freaktarded jump earlier on for me, though.

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #312: April 19, 2008, 09:13:23 PM »
Hill pitched well enough to win, but he just made a few bad pitches in the 6th.

I'm pleased thus far.  well rather, I'm not disappointed.   he hasn't been throwing batting practice.

he's done about as well as I expected him to for his first outing.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #313: April 19, 2008, 09:13:37 PM »
This is what happened with Hill in his last start in Columbus.  Now Colome is coming in.. Oh brother
Here goes the lead.  I'd use Rivera here.  He's the stopper in our pen, in my mind.

Online ronnynat

  • Posts: 23221
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #314: April 19, 2008, 09:14:15 PM »
Are you kidding me? He has to be moved down in the order. RZ has to be like 1/15 in terms of scoring a runner at 3rd with less than two outs.

Took me a second to find this one. 1 for 8 (11 PA) with 3 SF and 4 RBI. Not good at all from a #3 hitter. :?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #315: April 19, 2008, 09:14:38 PM »
Here goes the lead.  I'd use Rivera here.  He's the stopper in our pen, in my mind.
I'd use him too. Colome scares the crap out of me.

Online ronnynat

  • Posts: 23221
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #316: April 19, 2008, 09:15:35 PM »
Don't give in here, Colome.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #317: April 19, 2008, 09:15:56 PM »
This dude is freaking lame. His control is awful.   :roll:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #318: April 19, 2008, 09:16:13 PM »
If Manny was going to put Colome in I would have just assumed he leave Hill in the game.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #319: April 19, 2008, 09:16:59 PM »
freaking BP.  What a bum. 

Online ronnynat

  • Posts: 23221
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #320: April 19, 2008, 09:18:03 PM »
That was odd.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84931
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #321: April 19, 2008, 09:18:05 PM »
Felipe you dumb ass.  I hate Colome

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #322: April 19, 2008, 09:18:47 PM »
the real Lopez rearing his ugly head?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #323: April 19, 2008, 09:19:42 PM »
I'm changing my freaking username.  Thanks for using our most baserunner-friendly reliever with runners on in a close game, Manny.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13890
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 2
« Reply #324: April 19, 2008, 09:20:28 PM »
the real Lopez rearing his ugly head?
I don't think he could've done anything differently to get that runner out.