Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 14906 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5635
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #75: September 26, 2007, 07:58:48 PM »
Lopez!!!

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5635
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #76: September 26, 2007, 08:00:16 PM »
So you are a cyborg! Awesome . . .

Can you bend steel?

nah, i just take plays off.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23208
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #77: September 26, 2007, 08:00:35 PM »
I just don't understand how someone who is so serviceable in a long relief role can be so awful at starting.

I think he leaves teams in a state of disbelief at his super slow fastball when he's a reliever. When they expect it from the beginning, he's left w/ nothing.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23208
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #78: September 26, 2007, 08:01:14 PM »
Let's go, Zimmerman!

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9238
  • Are we having fun yet?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #79: September 26, 2007, 08:02:55 PM »
I think he leaves teams in a state of disbelief at his super slow fastball when he's a reliever. When they expect it from the beginning, he's left w/ nothing.

Either way, why the hell is he starting?  He clearly sucks in the role.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11543
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #80: September 26, 2007, 08:03:34 PM »
I turn on the game, saw the score, and figured Bacsik was starting.
So worthless.

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9238
  • Are we having fun yet?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #81: September 26, 2007, 08:03:34 PM »
Good AB by Zimmmmm.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23208
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #82: September 26, 2007, 08:04:44 PM »
Either way, why the hell is he starting?  He clearly sucks in the role.

I'm hoping it's because they don't care about him. I know that sounds mean, but I hope it's true. We need to save all those that will be here next season. No chances on a season that is all but over. It'd suck to lose someone at this point.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11543
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #83: September 26, 2007, 08:06:26 PM »
bacsik is such a tool.
5-0
wasted game

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9238
  • Are we having fun yet?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #84: September 26, 2007, 08:06:35 PM »
You've got to be freaking kidding me.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 38525
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #85: September 26, 2007, 08:06:45 PM »
You're killing us Bacsik!

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #86: September 26, 2007, 08:07:44 PM »
LATE BREAKING NEWS: BACSIK BLOWS

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #87: September 26, 2007, 08:08:30 PM »
Hanrahan warming up in the bullpen...wow...gonna be a great game.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5635
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #88: September 26, 2007, 08:08:37 PM »
IN all seriousness, i'm not shocked at all whats happening to nite. Its almost expected when Bacsik starts. I expect nothin less from him. I conceded this game in tha first inning .

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #89: September 26, 2007, 08:08:56 PM »
Well, this will be my last T.V. game of the yr. Thanks for making it one I will remember Mighty Mike!

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #90: September 26, 2007, 08:09:50 PM »
O ya, does anyone else see the resemblance between Humber and Langerhans?

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17269
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #91: September 26, 2007, 08:10:21 PM »
Either way, why the hell is he starting?  He clearly sucks in the role.


Um... you can't say "hell" or "sucks" "freaking" or "blows" in tonight's Game Thread.  It's the annual Nice Game Thread Night, to attract newbies.

Oh pshaw. Whilst driving home, the Metropolitans scored three runs to take a 4-0 lead.  They will certainly be disappointed when our Nationals take the lead away.  ...TWO home runs to the same player? Oh dear!  Mikey is going to have to work on that little problem, on the Giants payroll next year.

Bacsik 0
Mets 5

At least Frazier is on TV tonight! 

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5635
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #92: September 26, 2007, 08:10:31 PM »
Mike Bacsik is like tha baseball version equivalent of Rex`Grossman.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11543
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #93: September 26, 2007, 08:11:16 PM »
bacsik's done. thank god

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23208
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #94: September 26, 2007, 08:11:29 PM »
I believe that is the official end to Mike Bacsik's ML career.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29995
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #95: September 26, 2007, 08:11:29 PM »
Is this Bacsik's worst start of the season?  It sure feels like it.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 38525
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #96: September 26, 2007, 08:11:55 PM »
You may as well have just started Hanrahan. At least then the game would have been 0-0 when he came in.  :roll:

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11543
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #97: September 26, 2007, 08:13:34 PM »
wow...hanrahan in relief

id rather see like...detwiler...or something

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5635
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #98: September 26, 2007, 08:14:26 PM »
Is this Bacsik's worst start of the season?  It sure feels like it.

You can draw tha answer to this question like tha city draw tha powerball for tha lottery. Its jsut that many possibilities

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23208
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #99: September 26, 2007, 08:14:57 PM »
I'm hoping it's because they don't care about him. I know that sounds mean, but I hope it's true. We need to save all those that will be here next season. No chances on a season that is all but over. It'd suck to lose someone at this point.

I believe the same is true for Hanrahan. I don't mind him as much as Bacsik, though.