Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 13914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #25: September 19, 2007, 07:46:15 PM »
Not a good pitch, Matt.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #26: September 19, 2007, 07:47:11 PM »
Does anybody else think that baseball should add two more playoff teams to each conference?

Nah, half the MLB would be in the playoffs if they did that.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #27: September 19, 2007, 07:47:18 PM »
Keep it together, Matt.  Don't give the lead back!

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5629
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #28: September 19, 2007, 07:47:26 PM »
update plz. gameday is stuck on reyes

Offline oakviewnatfan

  • Posts: 328
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #29: September 19, 2007, 07:48:09 PM »
Chico now a respectable .163 w/7 hits and 3 RBI's in 43 AB's compared to Livan's .197 w/14 hits and 4 RBI's in 71 AB's has become our best hitting pitcher!

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #30: September 19, 2007, 07:48:43 PM »
Reyes hit one that got stuck in the outfield fence padding just below the yellow line, Wily Mo couldn't find it, they ruled it a ground-rule double.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5629
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #31: September 19, 2007, 07:49:03 PM »
Nah, half the MLB would be in the playoffs if they did that.
12 teams?? six in each league?? Its always a team or two that gets left out undeservingly.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #32: September 19, 2007, 07:50:00 PM »
update plz. gameday is stuck on reyes

Nothing's happened after the Reyes double.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #33: September 19, 2007, 07:53:00 PM »
12 teams?? six in each conference?? Its always a team or two that gets left out undeservingly.

I was exaggerating slightly but I still think that's too many teams in the playoffs.  I think the current format is pretty good compared the alternatives.  If you just played the top 4 or 5 teams from each league, money teams would dominate the playoffs every year.  If you do it your way, too many mediocre teams get into the playoffs and increase the odds of more deserving teams getting knocked off in short series.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #34: September 19, 2007, 07:53:02 PM »
Mark Lerner is in the booth with Don and Bob, though.  That's ironic considering the rumor that Bob is on his way out.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #35: September 19, 2007, 07:53:33 PM »
Nothing's happened after the Reyes double.

1 out, Reyes on second, 1-1 count to Wright at the moment.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5629
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #36: September 19, 2007, 07:55:31 PM »
I was exaggerating slightly but I still think that's too many teams in the playoffs.  I think the current format is pretty good compared the alternatives.  If you just played the top 4 or 5 teams from each league, money teams would dominate the playoffs every year.  If you do it your way, too many mediocre teams get into the playoffs and increase the odds of more deserving teams getting knocked off in short series.

In tha AL at least 1 90 win team gets left out every season. This season two will be left out. That not fear.


That new resident evil movie looks like shyt

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #37: September 19, 2007, 07:55:51 PM »
How many good breaking ball pitchers do we have?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #38: September 19, 2007, 07:56:07 PM »
Well, there goes the lead.  >:(

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #39: September 19, 2007, 07:59:16 PM »
That was  a brutal inning that luckily we only gave up one run.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #40: September 19, 2007, 08:00:51 PM »
We need runs, offense!

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5629
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #41: September 19, 2007, 08:01:08 PM »
Word around tha city is Daniel Snyder wants to biuild another stadium for tha skins in tha heart of dc. Has anybody heard anything about this. i find it hard to believe since FedexField is relatively new.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48746
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #42: September 19, 2007, 08:03:01 PM »
Mark Lerner is in the booth with Don and Bob, though.  That's ironic considering the rumor that Bob is on his way out.

Yeah but I doubt it's a done deal yet. If it's a done deal then there is nothing that can be done about it because they have their man already chosen. Maybe it's still up in the air and Bob is trying to get some fan support in his favor for negotiations. I would like to see Mel Proctor back but don't really care for the most part. I suspect they may want a younger man for the job.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48746
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #43: September 19, 2007, 08:04:31 PM »
Word around tha city is Daniel Snyder wants to biuild another stadium for tha skins in tha heart of dc. Has anybody heard anything about this. i find it hard to believe since FedexField is relatively new.




That's a rumor that has been bouncing around for a while. I don't believe it. At least not at this point in time. Maybe in a couple years.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #44: September 19, 2007, 08:06:08 PM »
Felipe you IDIOT!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #45: September 19, 2007, 08:06:14 PM »
Ugh...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48746
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #46: September 19, 2007, 08:06:28 PM »
That's embarrassing from Lopez. He got picked off twice in the same at bat.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #47: September 19, 2007, 08:07:28 PM »
Felipe, when #3, #4, and #5 are coming to bat, it's more important that you stay on base than that you get a good jump!

Offline rileyn

  • Posts: 1342
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #48: September 19, 2007, 08:08:11 PM »
I would like to see Guzman come back for the final week, if for no other reason than to see Felipe on the bench.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36925
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #49: September 19, 2007, 08:09:27 PM »
We need a big one here, Austin!