Author Topic: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2  (Read 15142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #125: September 15, 2007, 09:25:00 PM »
I bet CC is not even available.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #126: September 15, 2007, 09:26:56 PM »
Bob stepped in it with that comment. How does he know it's all natural?

Offline fersaltiel

  • Posts: 1009
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #127: September 15, 2007, 09:27:13 PM »
CC better not be closing tonight.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #128: September 15, 2007, 09:27:24 PM »
WHy not? He is our closer, no matter how horrible he performs. We haven't stopped him pitching so far when opportunies calls for him, why stop now.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #129: September 15, 2007, 09:28:18 PM »
He threw too many pitches last night. I doubt he'll be available.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #130: September 15, 2007, 09:28:34 PM »
They lifted Jiminez. Its not like Lopez hasb been lights out defensively. We might need Jiminez bat again tonite.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #131: September 15, 2007, 09:28:44 PM »
wow, 5 hits, 5 runs for us.

I'm used to 8-11 hits, 2 runs.

Offline fersaltiel

  • Posts: 1009
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #132: September 15, 2007, 09:29:04 PM »
WHy not? He is our closer, no matter how horrible he performs. We haven't stopped him pitching so far when opportunies calls for him, why stop now.

I just don't trust him. 10 blown saves, that is a TERRIBLE number. We should definitely start trying with different options by now.

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #133: September 15, 2007, 09:30:30 PM »
He threw too many pitches last night. I doubt he'll be available.

He throws too many pitches every outing he has. Its not like he can't pitch consecutive games. Thurday was an offday. He should be good to go tonite, and he should want to go tonite to get tha bad taste outta his mouth after last nite.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11023
  • babble on
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #134: September 15, 2007, 09:30:38 PM »
Andruw just got owned...

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #135: September 15, 2007, 09:30:43 PM »
Man, the old Andruw would have clocked the clock out of that ball.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #136: September 15, 2007, 09:31:24 PM »
1 more inning.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40934
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #137: September 15, 2007, 09:31:26 PM »
How can anybody look at the Andruw Jones that just popped out and even consider giving him a long-term deal?  :?

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #138: September 15, 2007, 09:31:40 PM »
I just don't trust him. 10 blown saves, that is a TERRIBLE number. We should definitely start trying with different options by now.

Options like what? We tried Rauch already. That worked out well.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #139: September 15, 2007, 09:31:48 PM »
Alright, one more time by the bp...PLEASE?!!

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #140: September 15, 2007, 09:32:17 PM »
How can anybody look at the Andruw Jones that just popped out and even consider giving him a long-term deal?  :?
BEcasue they  look at his hr and rbi numbers as opposed to that pop out.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40934
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #141: September 15, 2007, 09:33:31 PM »
BEcasue they  look at his hr and rbi numbers as opposed to that pop out.

Well, if they look at his BA, they'll keep the checkbook closed.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #142: September 15, 2007, 09:33:49 PM »
I didn't know Hill's ERA was still that low. Nice.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #143: September 15, 2007, 09:35:00 PM »
I wouldn't give Andruw Jones a penny over 6 million and no more than 3 years! I wouldn't be at all surprised if he turned out to be a product of the juice.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11023
  • babble on
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #144: September 15, 2007, 09:35:08 PM »
CC warming up...

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #145: September 15, 2007, 09:35:16 PM »
Well, if they look at his BA, they'll keep the checkbook closed.

Only the best few in the game have high BA AND high HR/RBI numbers.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40934
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #146: September 15, 2007, 09:35:25 PM »
From 3-0 to a pop out.  :?

Offline metssuck

  • Posts: 5651
  • Werth on a roll!!!!
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #147: September 15, 2007, 09:35:42 PM »
Well, if they look at his BA, they'll keep the checkbook closed.

YOu judge a player by one bad season? His worst season has bettter numbers than anybody on our squad

Online PC

  • Posts: 40934
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #148: September 15, 2007, 09:36:01 PM »
I wouldn't give Andruw Jones a penny over 6 million and no more than 3 years! I wouldn't be at all surprised if he turned out to be a product of the juice.

I've been thinking the same thing and add to that his age.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11023
  • babble on
Re: Nationals vs Braves, Game 2
« Reply #149: September 15, 2007, 09:36:34 PM »
I was just thinking the same thing...

I wouldn't give Andruw Jones a penny over 6 million and no more than 3 years! I wouldn't be at all surprised if he turned out to be a product of the juice.