Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 5569 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #200: July 27, 2007, 08:47:22 PM »
That doesn't necessarily mean he's been pitching well; more like the hitters are too tempted by his beachballs, and swing early.

It's MEAT balls not beach balls. Get your pitchers straight.

How did that ball get through.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16643
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #201: July 27, 2007, 08:47:23 PM »
Double play here Big Mike...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #202: July 27, 2007, 08:48:57 PM »
LOL It's Latin night and they were just playing "Smoke on the Water" By Deep Purlple  :lol:

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #203: July 27, 2007, 08:49:03 PM »
Redding has been clocked at 94.

It's really odd, but he's the ONLY pitcher I haven't seen this year. All of the games he's pitched are the only games I've missed. I have to see this guy pitch.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #204: July 27, 2007, 08:51:00 PM »
uh oh...Ray Ray's warming up.

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #205: July 27, 2007, 08:51:56 PM »
WOW...wow...

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #206: July 27, 2007, 08:51:56 PM »
OUSTANDING DOUBLE PLAY!!!!! ZIMMERMAN PWNS ALL

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #207: July 27, 2007, 08:52:04 PM »
It's really odd, but he's the ONLY pitcher I haven't seen this year. All of the games he's pitched are the only games I've missed. I have to see this guy pitch.

He's pitching tomorrow's matinée. 

Unbelievable DP!

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9243
  • The regular season is a flat circle
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #208: July 27, 2007, 08:52:19 PM »
WOW WHAT A DP!

Offline eckseid

  • Posts: 854
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #209: July 27, 2007, 08:52:26 PM »
wow.. awesome dp!

Offline Naticus Maximus

  • Posts: 60
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #210: July 27, 2007, 08:52:40 PM »
what a magic double play!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #211: July 27, 2007, 08:53:05 PM »
Lo Duca may have been safe at first so it's nice to be getting the benefit of the doubt for a change. I think the 1B umpire was caught up in admiration of the stellar Nat defense.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16643
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #212: July 27, 2007, 08:53:12 PM »
I so called that double play!

Wow ... the benefit of another close call at first - I must be dreaming ...

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #213: July 27, 2007, 08:53:21 PM »
I'm pretty sure Lo Duca was safe at first, we are getting some calls tonight.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16643
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #214: July 27, 2007, 08:54:44 PM »
I'm pretty sure Lo Duca was safe at first, we are getting some calls tonight.

All I have to say - is about frickin time -

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #215: July 27, 2007, 08:54:45 PM »
I'm pretty sure Lo Duca was safe at first, we are getting some calls tonight.
I thought he was safe too but oh well.. We are way overdue to get some calls in our favor

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #216: July 27, 2007, 08:54:56 PM »
I so called that double play!

Wow ... the benefit of another close call at first - I must be dreaming ...

Doesn't count unless you type it on here (otherwise it's hindsight bias  :lol:)

And the replay showed he was definitely safe.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #217: July 27, 2007, 08:56:40 PM »
Bacsik has to be under or around 70 pitches so there is no reason why he can't squeeze one more frame out of that arm. We have Monday off anyway.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #218: July 27, 2007, 08:57:39 PM »
Bacsik has to be under or around 70 pitches so there is no reason why he can't squeeze one more frame out of that arm. We have Monday off anyway.
69 pitches through 6.  7-8-9 hitters due up but they have hammered him all game

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #219: July 27, 2007, 08:57:54 PM »
Doesn't count unless you type it on here (otherwise it's hindsight bias  :lol:)

And the replay showed he was definitely safe.

Lo Duca must have been watching and admiring, too, because it shouldn't even have been THAT close.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16643
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #220: July 27, 2007, 08:58:36 PM »
Doesn't count unless you type it on here (otherwise it's hindsight bias  :lol:)

And the replay showed he was definitely safe.

Oh yee of little faith -- check back not only did I call it - I typed it ...

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9243
  • The regular season is a flat circle
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #221: July 27, 2007, 09:01:15 PM »
Man, Bacsik's STILL pitching...

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16643
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #222: July 27, 2007, 09:01:29 PM »
Man, Bacsik's STILL pitching...

Very low pitch count ...

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #223: July 27, 2007, 09:01:40 PM »
lead-off infield single.. Bacsik can't get out the guys at the bottom of the order.. Get the pen ready, Manny

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 1
« Reply #224: July 27, 2007, 09:01:51 PM »
How lucky...