Author Topic: Nats to Pulaski, VA?  (Read 1029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Topic Start: July 16, 2007, 09:27:20 AM »
(Found this off another site)

http://www.tricities.com/tristate/tri/sports.apx.-content-articles-TRI-2007-07-14-0011.html

APPALACHIAN LEAGUE NOTEBOOK: Pulaski could draw Washington Nationals minor league affiliate

Saturday, Jul 14, 2007 - 12:59 AM

BY BUCKY DENT

BRISTOL HERALD COURIER

With a classic ballpark and a front office which renovated the facilities in every way Major League Baseball asked, Pulaski got sucker-punched by the Toronto Blue Jays.

There’s hope the New River Valley’s dormant Appalachian League franchise could turn on the lights next summer at Calfee Park.

League commissioner Lee Landers confirmed this week that the Washington Nationals are interested in filling the vacancy Toronto left last September.

"Ideally, you’d like to have it done as soon as possible," Landers said Tuesday night. "The people in Pulaski are great to work with ... I feel for the fans there and the gentlemen who ran the club. They did everything they were asked to do."

A Blue Jays affiliate for four years, Pulaski found out its horrible news not from Toronto general manager J.P. Ricciardi or another Blue Jays administrator, but from an assistant of player personnel.

The decision came so late in the even-year affiliate shuffle which the minors experience that Pulaski didn’t have a realistic chance to find a replacement.

Ten months after the fact, it still rankles Landers.

"When Cleveland made the decision to leave Burlington," Landers said, "we mutually agreed to hold off on announcing it so they could help us get a club in there. The Blue Jays ... boom.

"It’s hurt us in some municipalities. They ask you if the same thing can happen there that happened in Pulaski, and you can’t blame them."

Last year, the Blue Jays averaged 902 fans per game – a solid sixth out of 10 teams. The number is even better when one considers Pulaski drew from one of the smallest population bases in pro baseball.

The Nationals were connected with the vacancy last fall, but felt they didn’t have enough time to make a choice between a Gulf Coast League team or the Appy League.

According to Landers, one of the factors in the Nationals’ decision will be economics. The organization’s lowest affiliate resides in the Gulf Coast League, where it has been since the franchise was based in Montreal.

GCL franchises are the least expensive to operate because they normally work out of an organization’s spring training facility, which usually has dorms or a nearby hotel for players to reside.

Without a team in Pulaski this year, the league has been forced to make do with a nine-team loop which forces at least one team to be off in two-day stretches and requires at least four scheduled doubleheaders for each squad.

Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #1: July 16, 2007, 09:32:00 AM »
This could be an interesting move.

My wife interned as a web designer for the Pulaski Blue Jays and I visited the stadium down there several times.  The stadium is beautiful and in a great small town, mountain setting.  Close to Radford University and Virginia Tech.


Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7399
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #2: July 16, 2007, 12:38:03 PM »
GCL franchises are the least expensive to operate because they normally work out of an organization’s spring training facility, which usually has dorms or a nearby hotel for players to reside.

That's a huge factor for consideration, not to mention convenience to major airports, etc. If a scout, trainer, coach, etc. wants to visit the GCL team, they hop on a direct flight to Orlando and they have an hour or less drive to the complex. Also, some of the developmental folks and others in the organization live in or around the Orlando area. I really don't see them dropping a GCL team for a lot of reasons. But that doesn't mean they wouldn't pick up another team.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #3: July 16, 2007, 12:53:02 PM »
I seem to remember someone asking Kasten about this awhile ago and he downplayed the notion of an Appalachian League team. We have two Dominican Summer League teams, a GCL team, and a short-season A team. An Appalachian league team would make room for more prospects out of high school and undrafted free agents. Does anyone know if you can play in the Appalachian League after your GCL eligibility has run out? That would have promise . . .

Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #4: July 16, 2007, 01:50:22 PM »
That's a huge factor for consideration, not to mention convenience to major airports, etc. If a scout, trainer, coach, etc. wants to visit the GCL team, they hop on a direct flight to Orlando and they have an hour or less drive to the complex. Also, some of the developmental folks and others in the organization live in or around the Orlando area. I really don't see them dropping a GCL team for a lot of reasons. But that doesn't mean they wouldn't pick up another team.

Yeah, thats the only thing about Pulaski that might turn them off.  Its a beautiful area with a town that supports any team that plays there, its just there is nothing major there.  Closest airport I think is in Roanoke, VA one hour away.

Like I said, there is VA Tech and Radford University nearby and a lot of DC, VA, and MD students go there so the Nats fanbase is potentially down there.

Offline Kenz aFan

  • Posts: 5433
Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #5: July 17, 2007, 04:34:34 PM »
Some MLB teams has two Rookie league teams, I don't see why the Nats cant be one of those teams that have two rookie league teams. It would make for a great base to work from and as a result give more playing time to the players near the bottom the ladder. More playing time, means more chances to develop.

Having two rookie league teams would go a long way towards improving the Nats farm system.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28085
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nats to Pulaski, VA?
« Reply #6: July 17, 2007, 06:14:58 PM »
Dave B in Md. (from the other board) asked Kasten directly about this issue during the season, and said that Kasten was very negative on the chances. 

1-Cost differential vs. existing Florida location
2-Not enough talent to stock another team
3-Made other criticisms of the area which Dave has chosen to keep confidential.