Here's how I make of all this (if anyone cares):
You said that Cordero would be as productive as Zimmerman when placed under his current circumstance. Of course that is untrue, however, you were (I think) trying to make a metaphor that NOBODY could produce under his circumstance, which I completely agree with.
Okay...let's move on...
I'm sorry, but I'm guessing you like ronnynat aren't seeing what I wrote in my initial post. Let's look at what I said, and I quote, "
He showed that with the help of big bats in front of him he can produce, because he saw more fastballs. Hell, Wil Cordero would be just as productive hitting under the same circumstances."
OK, now let me break that down for you.
1)
He showed that with the help of big bats in front of him he can produce (meaning he had Soriano and/or Johnson in front of him most of the year)
2)
because he saw more fastballs. (with the big bats in front of him, he saw more fastballs, and less off-speed stuff)
3)
Hell, Wil Cordero would be just as productive hitting under the same circumstances. (For one, Cordero was used to push my point across, that anyone who's supposed to be a "hitter" would be "as productive", or as successful.
The whole point of my post was to say that, WHO is hitting in front of you (or behind you in some cases) in the batting order has a great deal to do with well you produce. I guess my writing methods are off the board, because neither of you was able to read the meaning behind what I did write. And you should also take note of the non use of the word "current".
Class dismissed...