Author Topic: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2  (Read 6257 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51978
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #200: June 19, 2007, 10:09:49 PM »
17 hits 15 runs. That's efficiency. 6 hits 1 run, not so much.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51978
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #201: June 19, 2007, 10:10:47 PM »
Santana owned the Mets tonight in a complete game.

Offline Jayman77

  • Posts: 243
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #202: June 19, 2007, 10:11:23 PM »
Again, I have to say that I'm not too surprised by this result.  The Tigers are a great team with a potent lineup.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83286
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #203: June 19, 2007, 10:11:58 PM »
The pitching sucked and the offense sucked.  The Tigers scored the game winning run in the first inning, lmao.  Hopefully Bacsik can give us 5 innings tomorrow with allowing 3 runs or less.  Rauch and Chief should be ready to throw at least 2 innings a piece. 

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4095
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #204: June 19, 2007, 10:13:30 PM »
17 hits 15 runs. That's efficiency. 6 hits 1 run, not so much.

Yeah, but at that rate, with only 90 more hits we'd take this game.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83286
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #205: June 19, 2007, 10:13:35 PM »
Again, I have to say that I'm not too surprised by this result.  The Tigers are a great team with a potent lineup.
Just because they are a great team it doesn't mean that they should beat us by 14 runs..  How often does a team lose by 14 runs (at home)?  Almost never.   

Offline Jayman77

  • Posts: 243
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #206: June 19, 2007, 10:16:24 PM »
Just because they are a great team it doesn't mean that they should beat us by 14 runs..  How often does a team lose by 14 runs (at home)?  Almost never.   

Why not?  They have great hitters, and great hitters are supposed to prey upon weak and ineffective pitching, which is what the Nationals have.  They would've probably scored this many against one of the regular starters, too.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17435
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #207: June 19, 2007, 10:16:36 PM »
FINAL:
Tigers 15

Nationals One sorry team



Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83286
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #208: June 19, 2007, 10:20:00 PM »
Why not?  They have great hitters, and great hitters are supposed to prey upon weak and ineffective pitching, which is what the Nationals have.  They would've probably scored this many against one of the regular starters, too.
No chance.  After the first week or two, Hill and Bergmann were just lights out in every single start.  You could count on them every game to give you good chance to win.  They never got knocked out of a game early. 

Offline Jayman77

  • Posts: 243
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #209: June 19, 2007, 10:22:39 PM »
You don't know that for sure.  Like I said, I wonder what's going to happen when Hill, Bergmann, and Patterson come back and have bad starts.  I won't be surprised to see you calling for Bacsik, Speigner, and Simontacchi :)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 51978
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #210: June 19, 2007, 10:28:36 PM »
Nats lowlights made Baseball Tonight.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Tigers, Game 2
« Reply #211: June 20, 2007, 01:41:39 AM »
Nats lowlights made Baseball Tonight.

Of course they did!  It never matters when the Nats win, but if they get crushed 15-1 well ho ho, that is something to report on! :roll:

freak ESPN.