Author Topic: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career  (Read 1393 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 68937
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #75: July 06, 2018, 09:02:42 PM »
Agreed.  Who should be in from the post-Expos Nat though? 



No one needs to be in right now. There's no rush or you end up doing something this stupid. Zimmerman should be the first one inducted.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 22457
  • This is Howie do it...
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #76: July 06, 2018, 09:21:33 PM »


No one needs to be in right now. There's no rush or you end up doing something this stupid. Zimmerman should be the first one inducted.

Maybe they want Werth to pay for another community ball field...

Online bluestreak

  • Posts: 4968
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #77: July 06, 2018, 09:26:47 PM »
Agreed.  Who should be in from the post-Expos Nat though?

 Zimmerman.

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 32940
  • Hell yes!
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #78: July 06, 2018, 09:40:54 PM »
No one needs to be in right now. There's no rush or you end up doing something this stupid. Zimmerman should be the first one inducted.

Zimmerman.

That's probably the right answer. I was trying to think who else - Livan?  Max is laying the groundwork now.   

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 68937
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #79: July 06, 2018, 09:45:59 PM »
Scherzer is on his way but Zimmerman comes first. Hernandez played only 3 full seasons and parts of two others here. I know he has some sort of cult following because of the lean years but the time he was here doesn't merit inclusion into the ring of fame.

Online bluestreak

  • Posts: 4968
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #80: July 06, 2018, 09:46:52 PM »
That's probably the right answer. I was trying to think who else - Livan?  Max is laying the groundwork now.

Max will end up there. You’re in the ring of honor if you go into Cooperstown wearing a Nats Cap.

Online Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 14626
  • babble on
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #81: July 09, 2018, 12:52:17 PM »
As the criteria are 100% subjective - Chief or Livo?
Agreed.  Who should be in from the post-Expos Nat though? 

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 14129
  • 2018 nationals
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #82: July 09, 2018, 01:36:15 PM »
This is dumb. no way he should be in the ring of honor (and neither should Robinson or Rodriguez for that matter).

:clap:

I get the idea of putting him in, I'd have less of a problem with it if we didn't have so many Expos in it.

The first one in should have been Nats great adam dunn

Offline Mathguy

  • Posts: 7510
  • Whoa That Was A Good One ! Poke His Brain Here !
    • Outer Banks Beach House
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #83: July 11, 2018, 02:09:38 PM »
My 1st choice would be Livan

:clap:

I get the idea of putting him in, I'd have less of a problem with it if we didn't have so many Expos in it.

The first one in should have been Nats great adam dunn

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19318
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #84: July 11, 2018, 03:06:33 PM »
:clap:

I get the idea of putting him in, I'd have less of a problem with it if we didn't have so many Expos in it.

The first one in should have been Nats great adam dunn

Cap the numbers and replace the oldest first - once the expos are gone, quietly remove the cap

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 17037
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #85: July 14, 2018, 12:15:52 PM »
Are the signs where F. Robinsson and F. Howard a part of the Ring of Honor? (That's where Werth's name is going, according to Mark Lerner at the VIP FanFest party.)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 68937
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Jayson Werth Calls it a Career
« Reply #86: July 14, 2018, 04:58:37 PM »

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 55881
  • We had 'em all the way.