Author Topic: WP: Nats MASN deal renegotations will have a huge impact  (Read 101265 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2854
  • Too Stressed to care.
https://thefandc.radio.com/articles/news/report-orioles-pitch-settlement-masn-dispute-nats

Look who wants to settle
I'm sure that the Orioles offer was pennies on the dollar compared to the contact adjustments.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19302
Which itself said nothing new

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19302
I'm sure that the Orioles offer was pennies on the dollar compared to the contact adjustments.

Masn literally can not afford what the contract calls for

Offline Traded For Mclain

  • Posts: 151
No reason for the Nats to settle quickly now.  Peter Angelos will be going to hell soon, when he does the MASN mess complicates either the sale or transfer of the blO's.  Nats and MLB have all the leverage now IMO.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 12126
    • Twitter
Manfred confirmed what the Baltimore Sun reported, the MASN dispute is going back to the MLB arbitration. This is what Angelos was fighting against.

Quote
"At the end of the litigation that took place in the New York courts, the most important thing that was determined was that the original agreement of the parties must be upheld and the most important aspect of that is that the Revenue Sharing Definitions Committee is the body that the parties agreed would settle this dispute,” baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred said.

Offline aBaltoNat

  • Posts: 1434
Manfred confirmed what the Baltimore Sun reported, the MASN dispute is going back to the MLB arbitration. This is what Angelos was fighting against.

So, good for us?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 12126
    • Twitter
So, good for us?

Probably, it's what the Lerner's wanted and what Angelos was fighting against, so it seems like a win. Thing is that the previous MLB panel set a fee level that kept MASN solvent, so while the end might be in sight the result is unlikely to be true fair market value.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 22166
Virtually no chance that the Os leave Baltimore, but the MASN deal does give them good reason, if the Os leave Angelos still owns most of the TV rights for DC and Baltimore along with whatever new area they pick up. He owns the only franchise in pro sports that would retain their old market if they move, a two for none deal...

Here's the problem: this was NEVER their market at any period of time under MLB's rules and bylaws. The Orioles' existence was granted by an existing MLB team -- the Senators in the same league, who did get a ONE-TIME fee for not acting to gum up the works but did not have to cede some media rights that MLB had granted it. Thus, when the Senators left in 1971, the Orioles didn't automatically take over rights as have an open ticket to market to the large market to its southwest for as long as it could...


Here's the clincher: The Baltimore Orioles defined marketing area according to MLB bylaws includes Baltimore City and County and the counties touching Baltimore County. That's it. The Baltimore Orioles' cable broadcast area before MLB‘s return to its defined media market in metropolitan Washington had extended from the Pennsylvania border to North Carolina, and from Delaware to West Virginia; however, that broadcasting privilege was not and did not equate to a defined and exclusive broadcasting right for the Baltimore Orioles. During the 18 years of overlap of the Orioles and Senators, the latter's defined market included Montgomery County, Prince Georges County, the District, and Northern Virginia. Nothing transferred that northward, nor was there any precedent for considering it to be officially ceded just because the Senators were gone. Each previous Orioles ownership group before Angelos acting accordingly, stating that the only stipulation they would ask MLB to prioritize was to put a returned team in the NL.

What did that was an owner-turned-commish that ran from any sort of litigation (don't forget how long it took to get a team to move in large because of that) became caretaker of the Nats and of their sale. What that let Angelos do was try to bluff his way into being owed "rights", even though an internal MLB study from the early 2000s confirmed he was owed nothing. Selig didn't care, made a bad deal that any prospective owner had to sign on to in order to get the Nats, and that was that. And now MLB sits around and lets the team not be paid its monies for years on end. Pathetic.

I don't see how it is legally possible for Angelos to move the Orioles and continue to control broadcast rights in Baltimore, DC or anywhere nearby. Why wouldn't the Minnesota Twins and the Texas Rangers continue to own broadcast rights in the DC area, after each of them moved a Senators team? The Rangers could have potentially broadcast their games in the DC area, (even though it would not induce anyone to attend games in Texas.)

When the Senators moved in 1971, cable TV was not a significant factor in watching baseball. Most teams did not have cable TV contracts until the 1980s or 1990s. People watched games based on the strength of antennas.

 

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19302
I don't see how it is legally possible for Angelos to move the Orioles and continue to control broadcast rights in Baltimore, DC or anywhere nearby. Why wouldn't the Minnesota Twins and the Texas Rangers continue to own broadcast rights in the DC area, after each of them moved a Senators team? The Rangers could have potentially broadcast their games in the DC area, (even though it would not induce anyone to attend games in Texas.)

When the Senators moved in 1971, cable TV was not a significant factor in watching baseball. Most teams did not have cable TV contracts until the 1980s or 1990s. People watched games based on the strength of antennas.

(Image removed from quote.)  (Image removed from quote.)

He won’t own the dc market’s rights, however he will own the nationals rights. I think a move would likely require him to relinquish those rights as a condition, some of the reporting speculated that mlb approval of new ownership after he dies may also have that as a stipulation

Offline LoveAngelos

  • Posts: 763
Absent Washington, Baltimore probably isn’t a big enough market





Not true. Angelos said there are no baseball fans in Washington. Just call them the Chapter 11 Birds  :evil: :hysterical:

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 18733
For the sake of everyone in that beleaguered town, I hope the Os outlast their horrible owner. I'll never be a fan, but I don't wish the worst on anyone. (Well, except Snyder and Angelos.)

Offline LoveAngelos

  • Posts: 763
For the sake of everyone in that beleaguered town, I hope the Os outlast their horrible owner. I'll never be a fan, but I don't wish the worst on anyone. (Well, except Snyder and Angelos.)


The problem   dem Bird fans (who do wish the worst on the Nationals) have is that Angelos spawned two sons who are equally skilled in running a baseball team as their toad like looking father

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 18733
That is a problem for them.

Fortunately, Os fans aren't a real problem for us. Except when they infest Nats Park.


The problem   dem Bird fans (who do wish the worst on the Nationals) have is that Angelos spawned two sons who are equally skilled in running a baseball team as their toad like looking father